• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Future Schedule

Paytonlives said:
Every couple of years this type of thread comes up.

And there are three main complains no matter how the schedule is.

If the schedule has an FBS Oregon on it people complain because of the butt kicking and injury posiblities.

If its all FCS then people complain about the choice of teams

If there is a NIAI or Div 2 team then all hell breaks loose.

I for one want the Grizzlies in the playoffs every year and a FBS ass kicking or Div 2 win hurts way too much

This schedule though maybe not the most glitzy schedule it makes for a great chance for the Griz to be in the playoffs. So I say Keep playing a FCS only schedule EVERY FRICKIN YEAR

Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that.
 
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
Every couple of years this type of thread comes up.

And there are three main complains no matter how the schedule is.

If the schedule has an FBS Oregon on it people complain because of the butt kicking and injury posiblities.

If its all FCS then people complain about the choice of teams

If there is a NIAI or Div 2 team then all hell breaks loose.

I for one want the Grizzlies in the playoffs every year and a FBS ass kicking or Div 2 win hurts way too much

This schedule though maybe not the most glitzy schedule it makes for a great chance for the Griz to be in the playoffs. So I say Keep playing a FCS only schedule EVERY FRICKIN YEAR

Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that.

Read much? Said nothing about 2019. Playoffs should be THE GOAL EVERY YEAR. If not you are just a a red headed step child basing your season on one game. Sound familiar?


But if you want to talk 2019, then...
Griz lead in the Late 3rd/4th quarter 9 of 11 games in 2018.
Could have won 10 of the 11 games
Get EWU,Weber and Idaho at Home...

Worry about your own fing team... They could easily be 0-3 to start the season

If you take FBS Oregon off the schedule this year it is much like the 2018 schedule and UM will be markedly better. So you do the math
 
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
Every couple of years this type of thread comes up.

And there are three main complains no matter how the schedule is.

If the schedule has an FBS Oregon on it people complain because of the butt kicking and injury posiblities.

If its all FCS then people complain about the choice of teams

If there is a NIAI or Div 2 team then all hell breaks loose.

I for one want the Grizzlies in the playoffs every year and a FBS ass kicking or Div 2 win hurts way too much

This schedule though maybe not the most glitzy schedule it makes for a great chance for the Griz to be in the playoffs. So I say Keep playing a FCS only schedule EVERY FRICKIN YEAR

Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that.

So you judge playoff potential by the schedule, and not the quality of the team. Apparently never played the game.
 
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
Every couple of years this type of thread comes up.

And there are three main complains no matter how the schedule is.

If the schedule has an FBS Oregon on it people complain because of the butt kicking and injury posiblities.

If its all FCS then people complain about the choice of teams

If there is a NIAI or Div 2 team then all hell breaks loose.

I for one want the Grizzlies in the playoffs every year and a FBS ass kicking or Div 2 win hurts way too much

This schedule though maybe not the most glitzy schedule it makes for a great chance for the Griz to be in the playoffs. So I say Keep playing a FCS only schedule EVERY FRICKIN YEAR

Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that.

So you judge playoff potential by the schedule, and not the quality of the team. Apparently never played the game.

Uh... ya, because those two go hand in hand silly. So the quality of your team is relative to all the teams you play throughout the season. In your case, that means you will probably play at least five teams that are better than you. So assuming things even out in terms of maybe winning one or two you shouldn't - and losing one or two you shouldn't, you'll end up right around 7-5? Yes it could end up better, or worse, you just have to play the season.

Every year a bunch of egrizzers get their panties in a bunch about my predictions for overall season records for Cats and griz and I'm almost always right within one game either way.
 
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
Every couple of years this type of thread comes up.

And there are three main complains no matter how the schedule is.

If the schedule has an FBS Oregon on it people complain because of the butt kicking and injury posiblities.

If its all FCS then people complain about the choice of teams

If there is a NIAI or Div 2 team then all hell breaks loose.

I for one want the Grizzlies in the playoffs every year and a FBS ass kicking or Div 2 win hurts way too much

This schedule though maybe not the most glitzy schedule it makes for a great chance for the Griz to be in the playoffs. So I say Keep playing a FCS only schedule EVERY FRICKIN YEAR

Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that.

So you judge playoff potential by the schedule, and not the quality of the team. Apparently never played the game.

Uh... ya, because those two go hand in hand silly. So the quality of your team is relative to all the teams you play throughout the season. In your case, that means you will probably play at least five teams that are better than you. So assuming things even out in terms of maybe winning one or two you shouldn't - and losing one or two you shouldn't, you'll end up right around 7-5? Yes it could end up better, or worse, you just have to play the season.

Every year a bunch of egrizzers get their panties in a bunch about my predictions for overall season records for Cats and griz and I'm almost always right within one game either way.

So if you say 7-5 that gives you a cushion of 8-4 to 6-6 You are really going out on a limb big fella.
 
The UM football schedule is entering a time of de-emphasis, probably necessary resulting from decreases in enrollment. Scheduling Central Washington, Butler and Dixie State is less than impressive and a four year Dixie State schedule is very puzzling. The AD, attempting to justify his decision commented that Dixie State has a great football tradition!
 
Paytonlives said:
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that.

So you judge playoff potential by the schedule, and not the quality of the team. Apparently never played the game.

Uh... ya, because those two go hand in hand silly. So the quality of your team is relative to all the teams you play throughout the season. In your case, that means you will probably play at least five teams that are better than you. So assuming things even out in terms of maybe winning one or two you shouldn't - and losing one or two you shouldn't, you'll end up right around 7-5? Yes it could end up better, or worse, you just have to play the season.

Every year a bunch of egrizzers get their panties in a bunch about my predictions for overall season records for Cats and griz and I'm almost always right within one game either way.

So if you say 7-5 that gives you a cushion of 8-4 to 6-6 You are really going out on a limb big fella.

SHow me anybody that can predict a team's exact record every year. I just look at the facts and put my best estimate out there and I'm usually right on or miss by one game. Beats the FUHK out of the idiots that predict 1o-2, 11-1 with your schedule.
 
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
So you judge playoff potential by the schedule, and not the quality of the team. Apparently never played the game.

Uh... ya, because those two go hand in hand silly. So the quality of your team is relative to all the teams you play throughout the season. In your case, that means you will probably play at least five teams that are better than you. So assuming things even out in terms of maybe winning one or two you shouldn't - and losing one or two you shouldn't, you'll end up right around 7-5? Yes it could end up better, or worse, you just have to play the season.

Every year a bunch of egrizzers get their panties in a bunch about my predictions for overall season records for Cats and griz and I'm almost always right within one game either way.

So if you say 7-5 that gives you a cushion of 8-4 to 6-6 You are really going out on a limb big fella.

SHow me anybody that can predict a team's exact record every year. I just look at the facts and put my best estimate out there and I'm usually right on or miss by one game. Beats the FUHK out of the idiots that predict 1o-2, 11-1 with your schedule.

Show me anyone who can predict a team record, by looking at who they play but ignoring the quality of their team.

Do you think you can predict profitability of a company by looking at only revenues and ignoring expenses, or vice versa?
 
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
So you judge playoff potential by the schedule, and not the quality of the team. Apparently never played the game.

Uh... ya, because those two go hand in hand silly. So the quality of your team is relative to all the teams you play throughout the season. In your case, that means you will probably play at least five teams that are better than you. So assuming things even out in terms of maybe winning one or two you shouldn't - and losing one or two you shouldn't, you'll end up right around 7-5? Yes it could end up better, or worse, you just have to play the season.

Every year a bunch of egrizzers get their panties in a bunch about my predictions for overall season records for Cats and griz and I'm almost always right within one game either way.

So if you say 7-5 that gives you a cushion of 8-4 to 6-6 You are really going out on a limb big fella.

SHow me anybody that can predict a team's exact record every year. I just look at the facts and put my best estimate out there and I'm usually right on or miss by one game. Beats the FUHK out of the idiots that predict 1o-2, 11-1 with your schedule.

Show us where, before the season, you predicted the Cat and Griz records. Wold like to see what you said.
 
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
poorgriz said:
Uh... ya, because those two go hand in hand silly. So the quality of your team is relative to all the teams you play throughout the season. In your case, that means you will probably play at least five teams that are better than you. So assuming things even out in terms of maybe winning one or two you shouldn't - and losing one or two you shouldn't, you'll end up right around 7-5? Yes it could end up better, or worse, you just have to play the season.

Every year a bunch of egrizzers get their panties in a bunch about my predictions for overall season records for Cats and griz and I'm almost always right within one game either way.

So if you say 7-5 that gives you a cushion of 8-4 to 6-6 You are really going out on a limb big fella.

SHow me anybody that can predict a team's exact record every year. I just look at the facts and put my best estimate out there and I'm usually right on or miss by one game. Beats the FUHK out of the idiots that predict 1o-2, 11-1 with your schedule.

Show me anyone who can predict a team record, by looking at who they play but ignoring the quality of their team.

Do you think you can predict profitability of a company by looking at only revenues and ignoring expenses, or vice versa?

For your first line, no. Impossible. That's why I look at both. Quality of the team and quality of who they play.

2nd line, no. I look at both.
 
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
Paytonlives said:
So if you say 7-5 that gives you a cushion of 8-4 to 6-6 You are really going out on a limb big fella.

SHow me anybody that can predict a team's exact record every year. I just look at the facts and put my best estimate out there and I'm usually right on or miss by one game. Beats the FUHK out of the idiots that predict 1o-2, 11-1 with your schedule.

Show me anyone who can predict a team record, by looking at who they play but ignoring the quality of their team.

Do you think you can predict profitability of a company by looking at only revenues and ignoring expenses, or vice versa?

For your first line, no. Impossible. That's why I look at both. Quality of the team and quality of who they play.

2nd line, no. I look at both.

Then why did you say this, above? You said nothing about the quality of the team. You said only the schedule.

"Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that."
 
granitegriz said:
Spanky2, where are the supporting facts that Dixie State will be a total push over???

Well, I believe Rocky Mountain College would beat them 4 out of 5 games, but who can say as they have a great football tradition.
 
Spanky2 said:
granitegriz said:
Spanky2, where are the supporting facts that Dixie State will be a total push over???
Well, I believe Rocky Mountain College would beat them 4 out of 5 games, but who can say as they have a great football tradition.
A point I emphasized earlier in this thread.

If I were a buddy of Kent's (never met the man), I, frankly, would never let him live that down. :lol: :lol: :lol:

But the reality is ... they are (will be) a D-I opponent in our region and "beggars can't be choosers."
 
This thread still has a heartbeat. :(
What is the argument? The BSC puts out the schedule and our Griz does its part by playing the games, right? Whether a relatively easy schedule, like last year, or a tough schedule like this year, our Griz still have to do their part. If they play like they did last year, they will get their ass handed to them damn fast. Just fact. A second year under Hauck, I would expect a great deal of improvement by them. Can't have any Portland State fiasco's. I think they played down to the competition last year. They will, or should, play up to the level provided this year. A 8-4 record should be the baseline for this team. How much better, or worse :roll: , depends on them. :thumb:
 
tourist said:
This thread still has a heartbeat. :(
What is the argument? The BSC puts out the schedule and our Griz does its part by playing the games, right? Whether a relatively easy schedule, like last year, or a tough schedule like this year, our Griz still have to do their part. If they play like they did last year, they will get their ass handed to them damn fast. Just fact. A second year under Hauck, I would expect a great deal of improvement by them. Can't have any Portland State fiasco's. I think they played down to the competition last year. They will, or should, play up to the level provided this year. A 8-4 record should be the baseline for this team. How much better, or worse :roll: , depends on them. :thumb:
Not sure where you've been, but it's about OOC scheduling for which there is control. It's 3 or 4 games a year. I don't think anyone misunderstands the unbalanced conference schedule one gets in a 13 team conference.
 
Allow me to restate my point. If our Griz don't play as well as they are capable of playing, then it really doesn't matter who they play. An 'L' is an 'L.' Strength of schedule only matters AFTER they win. Sorry for the confusion.
 
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
PlayerRep said:
poorgriz said:
SHow me anybody that can predict a team's exact record every year. I just look at the facts and put my best estimate out there and I'm usually right on or miss by one game. Beats the FUHK out of the idiots that predict 1o-2, 11-1 with your schedule.

Show me anyone who can predict a team record, by looking at who they play but ignoring the quality of their team.

Do you think you can predict profitability of a company by looking at only revenues and ignoring expenses, or vice versa?

For your first line, no. Impossible. That's why I look at both. Quality of the team and quality of who they play.

2nd line, no. I look at both.

Then why did you say this, above? You said nothing about the quality of the team. You said only the schedule.

"Playoffs in 2019? Your schedule looks to be too much for that."

Ya, it's all relative - everybody knows that. Your record will be a result of the quality of your team, and who you play. You might have the best team you've ever had... but if you play an all FBS schedule you're probably not going to win a game.
 
Back
Top