IdaGriz01 said:
...
Got to wondering about this key statement. Turns out, there's some accuracy, and a whole lot of blowing smoke here. From reports I found, there facilities are supposedly pretty good. So, fair enough.
But as for “football tradition” … not so much. According to NCAA stats, Dixie State is 44-97 in D-II football since the 2006 season (as far back as the table goes). There best finish was 4th in the RMAC last year. Most years have been much worse than that.
The end of Haslam’s statement sums up the whole thing: By the time the Griz play Dixie, they will be a full-fledged Division I program. As such, they will be one of only a handful of FCS football programs in the region that are not already part of the Big Sky.
...
As this post suggests, I'm not all that happy about Dixie State -- whose only football tradition is as a loser (two barely winning seasons
in D-II since 2006). But they will be D-I when the Griz play them, so I'm okay with that. I just wish we could, once and for all, get the damn D-II opponents off the schedule. Hopefully, none of that will show up to fill the remaining TBD slots.
With that being said ...at the end of the day, it's still
all about the money. In a home-and-home OOC deal, the Griz can promise some good $$$, but even that gets hammered by travel costs if you bring in a team from (say) Virginia or even Texas. And how many opponents can boast a big enough home attendance to guarantee a good payday for the Griz? Damn few. And those that do have good crowds -- say a James Madison or a top HBCU -- have plenty of
much closer choices for their OOC schedules. It all comes down to the fact that UM simply does not have enough reasonably close FCS opponents to choose from for its OOC schedule. In the end, Dixie is a "cheap date" that we're stuck with.