BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
:thumb:
BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
47-14. UM D played well. Oregon scored 3 offensive TDs against our 2. UO had 6 FGs, a safety and a kickoff return. We had a new, poor QB (Jason Washington); 3 and outs and 3 TOs killed our D. BH finally put in frosh Cole Bergquist in Q4, who marched them down the field to score against the UO subs.ORGUNGRIZ said:I seem to recall out last Duck game was a blow out at well like 42 to 7.
grizindabox said:If people want the Griz to schedule FBS games...maybe the Griz should move to FBS.
BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
dbackjon said:AllWeatherFan said:HookedonGriz said:dbackjon said:Would CWU be an issue if they followed Dixie State's lead into the WAC/FCS Independence?
Not in my opinion, no . we need to be scheduling all FCS with a sprinkle of FBS, but we should never schedule a division 2 team ever. There’s literally no upside to scheduling a game like that. It can only hurt you for playoffs and a blowout win does nothing
The rub is that, consistent with your logic, no FBS program should schedule us...ever...for the exact same reasons.
One difference - FBS is allowed to count an FCS win (provided they give 90%-100% of allowed schollies) as a win for Bowl purposes. The Equivalent would be for FCS to "count" 1 DII win provided they met a minimum Schollie requirement
PlayerRep said:BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
How does playing a P5 help the UM brand, particularly when we get our butts kicked?
dbackjon said:AllWeatherFan said:HookedonGriz said:dbackjon said:Would CWU be an issue if they followed Dixie State's lead into the WAC/FCS Independence?
Not in my opinion, no . we need to be scheduling all FCS with a sprinkle of FBS, but we should never schedule a division 2 team ever. There’s literally no upside to scheduling a game like that. It can only hurt you for playoffs and a blowout win does nothing
The rub is that, consistent with your logic, no FBS program should schedule us...ever...for the exact same reasons.
One difference - FBS is allowed to count an FCS win (provided they give 90%-100% of allowed schollies) as a win for Bowl purposes. The Equivalent would be for FCS to "count" 1 DII win provided they met a minimum Schollie requirement
MikeyGriz said:I am against these games. We can make as much money scheduling an additional home game. The problem is getting a quality FCS team to agree to come to Missoula.
behappp said:PlayerRep said:BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
How does playing a P5 help the UM brand, particularly when we get our butts kicked?
You are assuming that we will always get our butts kicked. Is that the attitude that your friends on the team have?
Or do they like the challenge?
HookedonGriz said:RayWill said:HookedonGriz said:I’m all for it as I love going to these types of games. I would take this type of game over the shitty division 2 central Washington team we just schedule for 2020. I can’t believe Haslam got away with that
They will be FCS in 2020. Were the whole purpose for the stadium renovation and the boosters and athletic director want to either find an FCS conference or move as an independent by 2020
100%? Do you have a source? I know they’d like to be. I’d like to be a millionaire.
kemajic said:47-14. UM D played well. Oregon scored 3 offensive TDs against our 2. UO had 6 FGs, a safety and a kickoff return. We had a new, poor QB (Jason Washington); 3 and outs and 3 TOs killed our D. BH finally put in frosh Cole Bergquist in Q4, who marched them down the field to score against the UO subs.ORGUNGRIZ said:I seem to recall out last Duck game was a blow out at well like 42 to 7.
We'll be there again.
get'em_griz said:dbackjon said:AllWeatherFan said:HookedonGriz said:Not in my opinion, no . we need to be scheduling all FCS with a sprinkle of FBS, but we should never schedule a division 2 team ever. There’s literally no upside to scheduling a game like that. It can only hurt you for playoffs and a blowout win does nothing
The rub is that, consistent with your logic, no FBS program should schedule us...ever...for the exact same reasons.
One difference - FBS is allowed to count an FCS win (provided they give 90%-100% of allowed schollies) as a win for Bowl purposes. The Equivalent would be for FCS to "count" 1 DII win provided they met a minimum Schollie requirement
I'm pretty sure that DII games now count towards FCS playoff eligibility.
HookedonGriz said:RayWill said:HookedonGriz said:I’m all for it as I love going to these types of games. I would take this type of game over the shitty division 2 central Washington team we just schedule for 2020. I can’t believe Haslam got away with that
They will be FCS in 2020. Were the whole purpose for the stadium renovation and the boosters and athletic director want to either find an FCS conference or move as an independent by 2020
100%? Do you have a source? I know they’d like to be. I’d like to be a millionaire.
PlayerRep said:BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
How does playing a P5 help the UM brand, particularly when we get our butts kicked?
behappp said:PlayerRep said:BadlandsGrizFan said:Its good for the BRAND...especially in the Pacific Northwest for us.
How does playing a P5 help the UM brand, particularly when we get our butts kicked?
You are assuming that we will always get our butts kicked. Is that the attitude that your friends on the team have?
Or do they like the challenge?