Good point Colter. Another good contributor to the show is Marty. Dude is an encyclopedia! A lot of negative posters on Egriz just like to bitch. If they stopped and listened to some content from people like Marty, Sammy, and tons of other guests including coaches maybe they would learn something other than recreational outrage.
Did Schmidt's law school teach coherent sentences? Yours obviously didn't....
My school taught us how to think, be successful, and, if we wanted, to make a lot money. And it taught us to be in the game, not on the bench like you and your family.
If you put a spy on Lamson, that's either one less blitzer or one less man in coverage, and that's not going to go well. I just don't think the way your coaches run your defense is set up super well to spy against a QB that can throw and run. Best bet is that the confusion gets to the QB after a while, imo.
When I did this, I got: "This person is very smart and knowledgeable about the game of football. Is a strong supporter of the Montana team. Has been successful in life. Provides considerable information and research and supports his opinions. Has a significant amount of confidence. Shows that he grew up being tough on the reservation and worked and fought his way through good schools and a successful career in law. Doesn't suffer fools. Has great kids and a great wife. Knows how to travel and have fun. Is one of the best posters on the Montana football message board. Has made a huge number of friends in life. Can tell whether other posters ever played the game of football at any decent level. Well-liked by all his friends."
Mine said this.
Not true, because we have the best corner in the conference and can play more and better defenses and leave corners and secondary players on islands. Also, will have a new scheme designed by Tim Hauck and Kent Baer which will shut down Lamson. And the front 6/7 now has the confidence to come harder at Lamson and the Cat OL, who are not that great this year.
Just listened to it. Tough look to ‘dunk’ on an entire fan board for being juvenile and unserious by using fart noises. Lots of look at me energy. I’m remiss to even respond to it.I watched the video and was smiling the whole time. It was fun to see the hosts seemingly understand what eGriz is for the first time. I found myself thinking, "Uh, yeah, fellas. That's kinda what this is. Thought that was known." People have been threatening to fight dissenters at the Mo Club on here since '02.
I suppose I'd just say to anyone running a bit, it might be useful to know that you didn't invent doing so. That way, you might not be as shocked when you encounter one.
That is an interesting point about being negative about his former coach publicly. He is in what I would assume is a fairly unique position for most people in that his former coach is still coaching the team he is a fan of almost 20 years after he played and he is critiquing as a fan.
17 years later.
Quite a bit of work to find out what we already know.
Didn’t you say you were friends with JD Quinn in a previous post? Why don’t you ask him his opinion on this? He has always been unfiltered whenever I have heard him speak and might have some funny stories.
I do and might, but I am not out to get Schmidt and wouldn’t spill beans. I have already talked to some of my Bozeman family. I like Andrew. I know Russum, Bergquist, Horn, Chase, Ferrier, Mariani, Schulte, Burton, Dow, a number of the d-backs, and more too. My son was at the age he loved to talk to those guys on the field after games. We went to Chattanooga both years and stayed at the team hotel.
This new post reads as a highly idealized self portrait rather than an independent assessment, emphasizing intelligence, toughness, success, popularity, and authority. Psychologically, it reinforces a strong self enhancing bias and a need to control the narrative by asserting superiority across many domains at once. The language suggests identity fusion with football knowledge and the message board, with credibility framed as earned through hardship and achievement. The absence of ambiguity or self critique points to rigid self concept maintenance rather than balanced self awareness. Taken together with prior posts, it strengthens the impression of high confidence paired with sensitivity to challenge and a strong drive to be seen as dominant, respected, and unquestioned.
Feel free to point any stated thing or achievement in my life that isn’t true. You are just jealous. You are just hiding behind a keyboard. A coward. You feel threatened by people with confidence. There isn’t an insecure bone in my body. That seems to offend youThis new post reads as a highly idealized self portrait rather than an independent assessment, emphasizing intelligence, toughness, success, popularity, and authority. Psychologically, it reinforces a strong self enhancing bias and a need to control the narrative by asserting superiority across many domains at once. The language suggests identity fusion with football knowledge and the message board, with credibility framed as earned through hardship and achievement. The absence of ambiguity or self critique points to rigid self concept maintenance rather than balanced self awareness. Taken together with prior posts, it strengthens the impression of high confidence paired with sensitivity to challenge and a strong drive to be seen as dominant, respected, and unquestioned.
In essence, the post is less about describing reality and more about protecting and reinforcing the writer’s self image. The person is asserting authority, virtue, intelligence, and social success all at once because they feel that status is under threat. When someone presents themselves as universally competent and admired, it usually signals insecurity rather than confidence. The lack of nuance or self criticism suggests they struggle to tolerate disagreement or loss of standing. In plain terms, the post is a defensive self validation exercise, not an objective evaluation.
