bobcatOninetails
Well-known member
Plainsman said:Thank you. It may prove to be an insurmountable and eventually fruitless task, but my long term goal is to raise the quality of discourse on the board to the level of, say, Mad Magazine of old or possibly even to the heights of a respected publication like The Onion. I think the site has already surpassed Fox News with the rapier like insights expressed by posters and the often clear and balanced, and one might even say the sophisticated and cleverly nuanced sixth grade level debating and the thinly veiled and subtle insults members so delicately present. It is a challenging and , at times, an unsavory job but someone has to do it, as the saying goes.bobcatOninetails said:Plainsman said:Ursus1 said:Weren't they hired to bring in better players....3rd year not first
At the risk of going against the tide, I'll post the same thing I did on the game thread. I would like to see what this team could do with a different defensive coordinator. As ugly as the D was in the second half, there was a lot of young talent out there on the offensive side and Stitt recruited most of that talent, didn't he? His recruiting has appeared to fairly high quality. The one exception I would say is the concentration on WR talent and the paucity of defensive backfield talent.
Nice work of using "paucity". Word of the day.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
To quote Mad Magazine "who loves you baby?" I'm sure you get it.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD