garizzalies said:
:lol: Holy shit. Does this d-bag seriously think Simis running zone read against NDSU would have saved us in that game? HA! He needs to go back to coaching "mathletes." Too funny
That post singlehandedly proved to me that 75 knows nothing about football, is related to Simis, or just loves to argue. He probably thinks Simis' OT fumbles were someone else's fault.
Both fumbles were forced by Hayden Stout, if you actually watched the game. So yes, it actually was "someone else's fault." Stitt admitted he went "conservative" in the second half to "preserve the lead." For those who have the feeling that "we've done this before with the same result" they are likely somewhat more astute than the poster. Stitt also noted he tried to shift more to a passing game in the second half, while running up the play numbers (99 at ISU) because, as he astutely noted "you have to pass sometime."
I do like the logic. "Trying something that we didn't try wouldn't have produced anything different than what we did try and were failing miserably at and we know that just because!"
It continues to be of psychological interest that "game films on Makena Simis" exposed our whole strategy but that "game films on Brady Gustafson" didn't, even though that is clearly what happened at NDSU. And of course, the lesson learned long ago, that even d-bags might have picked up along the way, when something isn't working over and over, try something else. Yet, perhaps because this was on national TV, something needed to be proven about the Stitt Air Raid, results be damned.
UM has a very good passing quarterback. He set a record. And he can run better than any other QB on the team. Aiming at his qualities, Stitt had six of the best quarters UM played during the year. But, at each point where different strategies produced very positive results, Stitt would return to his preferred strategy, which produced negative results with Cal Poly and Liberty, at PSU where he clung to it much like he did later at NDSU, a near loss in the second half of ISU, and a blowout to NDSU.
If you want to have some fun with statistics now that we have a full season of them, the following are of interest if the performances of the individual QBs are homogenized, that is, their performances across the quarters they played in are adjusted to a "seasonal" format (as though they each played the entire season, every quarter).
Rushing (yds)
Brady 60
Chad 312
Makena 904
[Our actual leading season rusher was JN at 855. Statistically, Makena was our leading rusher. As it actually was, he was our third leading rusher playing just 13 quarters. His yds during the brief play at EWU are not included in Makena's totals].
Passing (yds)
Brady 1984
Chad 908
Makena 740
Total, passing + rushing (yds)
Brady 4126
Chad 3372
Makena 2960
Percentage of rushing yds to passing yds
Brady 1%
Chad 8%
Makena 23%
Touchdown Passes
Brady 25
Chad 22
Makena 28
Passing Efficiency
Brady 122.5
Chad 126.3
Makena 122.0
Interceptions (adjusted season total)
Brady 19
Chad 7
Makena 16
Aggregate team points/game
Brady 32
Chad 24
Makena 30
Aggregate team points/season
Brady 412
Chad 316
Makena 392
However, if the MSU/EWU games are seen as extreme outliers and removed from the data pool, but PSU remains in the data pool, the results are as follows:
Aggregate team points/game
Brady 20
Chad 24
Makena 30
Aggregate team points/season
Brady 266
Chad 316
Makena 392
Merry Christmas!
I am going shopping. Just starting.