argh! said:
CFallsGriz said:
So it's you, but with an understanding of language, including a shift button that isn't broken?
Nobody pointed out a misspelling that I saw, other than a "beloved" coach's name. And if you bothered to read my prior post, you'd have read that I didn't "necessarily disagree" with the larger point (though I do on some specifics).
Is it then that you figure in your overarching sensibilities, that some of us don't "like" him because he redshirted for Read, and then played for Dennehy? Or was it the two combined?
Joke of a post.
you are reading more into my post than what is there. my points were that 1) not spelling 'read' doesn't mean the guy didn't know or play for him, and 2) "some" people won't like him just because of his reasoning, which seem to be the basis for saying he's lying about being a player, etc, not the misspelling. i just happened to hit the quote on your post because you said he was "cold-ass busted", which he isn't. and no, i didn't read your earlier post. sorry, guess i didn't know that was a requirement for using this board.
argh, read my latest above post. Kevin Van V. lied about playing for Coach Read, and also lied about being a Kaimin apologist. Do you have the honestly and integrity to admit that he did that? He misspelled Read's name because he never played for Read.
He is completely biased about Hauck and the Kaimin reporter/Hauck matter. He also appears to have lied about the Kaimin having multiple witness accounts, on the record, about the Johnson/Swink matter. I recall the article. They had one witness, who I was told was completely drunk, who said one of the players kicked the kid.
I assume you are still a professor. Do you condone ad junct professors and journalists lying like this poster just did? I can't imagine that you do.