After reading the Denver Post article linked at the beginning of this thread, apparently the plan for D1 colleges/universities around the country is to recruit increasing numbers of students from other states so those students have to pay much higher tuition than in-state students, thus increasing revenues for all universities around the country and allowing them to thrive in the face of legislative budget cuts in their own states. That concept in and of itself is ludicrous so therefore I’ll play it out to its equally ludicrous conclusion. :lol:
In order to accomplish this plan, the athletic departments of these universities will have to continually raise much more money so they can upgrade athletic facilities in order to attract better coaches who will recruit better players who will win more games and thereby make their universities more attractive to out-of-state students than the universities in other states and in the students’ home state.
Here’s the paradox (it would seem obvious but evidently it isn’t) – in each game, there is a winning team and a losing team so everyone cannot win. Yet, the universities act as though everyone can win if only they raise and spend enough money to do so. That money supposedly translates to more positive exposure for the university in the form of athletic success and therefore attracts more out-of-state students and therefore more revenue for the university as a whole, allowing it to continue to grow.
That plan works right up to the point where the university loses too many football/basketball games and doesn’t get enough out-of-state students anymore and loses money and is forced to close down because they are broke. Ultimately, then, the only colleges/universities that will survive are those who win the most football/basketball games (basketball gets mentioned in this discussion but football is king and that’s what this is really all about).
The problem with that is then the closed universities and their bad football teams will no longer be around for the universities with the good football teams to beat up on. That means the good teams will all have to play each other and once again, there will be winners and losers and once again the losers will be forced to close their universities because their football team failed to win enough games to attract those highly valued out-of-state students.
Playing this whole scenario out to the end, there will only be one university left in this country that is worth paying out-of-state tuition to attend and that will be the university that wins the ‘Ultimate National Championship Game’. It will be a very large university with a very large football stadium and very large amounts of students, fans and money. Right now that Ultimate National Champion would be the University of Alabama, given their back-to-back national championships (and winners of 3 out of the last 4 titles) and their number one ranking as this season begins.
Is that what everyone wants, to become a student/alum/fan of a university that doesn’t even have a real mascot (Crimson Tide is not a mascot and they have somebody running around in an elephant costume for some reason) and whose students/alums/fans walk around holding up sticks that have an empty box of Tide laundry detergent on the end of them with a roll of toilet paper attached to the top of the Tide box while babbling the words “Roll Tide”? Is that the ultimate goal here, because that is where this is all headed … :roll:
This whole financial arms race approach to running colleges and universities across this country is ludicrous yet it’s what’s being done by the so-called ‘intellectually elite’ on college campuses across the country. With 37 million people already owing a total of $1 trillion in student loan debt, one would think they would be looking for ways to make college more affordable for students but instead, they have decided the answer is to get students to pay more by going out-of-state because a university has a winning football team. Genius!
As far as the whole ‘move up’ issue here in Montana, if there was ever a sliver of a chance that UM and MSU would move up, it is now gone. Both universities’ athletic departments have proven conclusively over the past several years that they cannot handle the administrative responsibilities of FCS football programs so why would the decision makers in this state agree to allow them to run larger FBS programs? If a program with 63 scholarships is too much for them to handle, how could they possibly deal with a bigger program with 85 scholarships? If anything, UM and MSU should be worried about being forced to move down to DII where both of the athletic departments would have a better chance of being able to handle things without the NCAA being on their backs.
