Ursus1 said:ilovethecats said:yep, this happens all of the time. love the mentality of the thread however. if a coach leaves a school and tries to get kids he recruited to follow him he's classless without ethics. but if a coach comes to a new school, and tries to get kids who committed to other schools already (not the school he was at) then that is fair game. :?PlayerRep said:I found this article about Chris Peterson's poaching Boise St recruits last year. At the time of the article, he had taken 4 of them, and had just won another one over Boise St. Look at what this author said (no big deal) and what the poll said (no big deal). Again, I don't know the ethics. I've seen what some of you have said, but would rather have more definitive information.
http://www.obnug.com/boise-state-football-recruiting/2014/1/23/5338250/making-sense-of-our-chris-petersen-recruiting-feelings
here's what i know. verbals mean very little to coaches. if there is a player that they want and they fill a need, that coach will continue to try to land the kid until he signs on the dotted line.
and to go another step farther, if and when kane moves on he'll likely pursue kids he was recruiting, whether they committed to msu or another school or not. and i'll have no problem with it whatsoever.
but it's cat griz stuff. this is egriz. so i'd expect nothing less. i'll remain unimpressed unless he actually gets one of your verbals to join him here.![]()
Actually I think it is fair game to go after ones, HE didn't have serious contact with while representing, being paid, by the other school.
Peterson went after the verbals he'd gotten when he was at Boise, including the Bozeman kid.