-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Sulser: What's your take?
- Thread starter Griz2k
- Start date
Hawkeyebowhunter
Well-known member
Sam A. Blitz said:
One circumstance is what you are judging him on? I'm sorry, but I just don't see it. Routes have been marginally better this year.
Hawkeyebowhunter
Well-known member
grizindabox said:
Because I haven't been able to watch every snap of every game? Nice one man-really astute observation on your end
Hawkeyebowhunter said:
Thanks. You still have never answered why you think Flowers should be on the field over the guys that have been.
Hawkeyebowhunter said:
I think he is good route runner, but he sometimes does round off the route, which can lead to a pick 6. There were 2 instances last week that I saw where he was a bit rounded in the route that were jumped and almost taken to the house. A great route gets into the defender a bit and cuts off of him to create that separation. He also can run excellent routes that shake people out of their shoes. Some receivers also are better at running certain routes than other routes. Just part of the game. I'd grade him a solid B+ in his overall route running ability.
Klucewich hasn't run the 110 hurdles yet. However, comparing their fastest 100m times, he may be ahead of Sulser.kemajic said:
100m
Klucewich: 11.08 (Freshman) - 12th best 100m time in MT (2018)
Sulser: 11.00 (Sophomore) - 4th best 100m time in MT (2016)
200m
Klucewich: 22.9 (Freshman)
Sulser: 22.4 (Sophomore)
Sulser didn't run the 100m his Junior year, and was hampered by a hamstring injury during track season this year (best time was 11.31).
Hawkeyebowhunter
Well-known member
grizindabox said:
I did though, if you read back just a little bit. We know what we have with Curran-drops.
Flowers is a better athlete and faster. I don't subscribe to the "devil you know" theory with receivers. Curran has shown us what he is-I believe Flowers has more potential plus is much younger and very well could develop into one of those "great" receivers people have been talking about.
griznative24
Well-known member
Well, after watching that end around TD he had, my take on Gabe Sulser is that he is, uh, fast.
Hawkeyebowhunter said:
So it is the "anyone but Curran" line of thinking. By the way, I am not trying to lobby for Curran, I just was curious how you got to Flowers....my first thought would have been Akem.
Sam A. Blitz
Well-known member
Hawkeyebowhunter said:
It's not a circumstance, it's an example. Watch him the next couple games. His routes have been crisp and sharp. His ability to get out of his breaks while maintaining speed is a key reason he's been getting open on the intermediate routes as a smaller target.
VictorG said:
Like John Nguyen and fumbles. In his last 3 years at UM, as a running back and a year or two as a punt returner, he lost 3 fumbles in total, or something like that. To hear, the chirpers, one would think he had a fumble every other time he touched the ball.
my take is that sulser is very fast, as evidenced by the play in which he scored a touchdown. it was just one play though, and while he clearly properly executed the play, there isn't a whole lot for someone like me, who has never seen him otherwise, make a good call on this. i guess i just hope that whatever decisions are made regarding his playing (and/or redshirting) work out well for him, and the griz.
