• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Let's see your preseason polls

You mean when both guys engaged off the line and the offensive guy went down when he disengaged? That would never get called and isn't PI.
I am no referee as I’m sure the rest of us aren’t but that sure seems like a defensive holding call.


ARTICLE 6. DEFENSIVE HOLDING

It is a foul for defensive holding if:

  1. a defensive player tackles or holds any opponent other than a runner, except as permitted in Article 5.
  2. during a punt, field goal attempt, or Try-kick attempt, B1 grabs and pulls an offensive player out of the way, allowing B2 to shoot the gap (pull-and-shoot) in an attempt to block the kick, except if B1 is advancing toward the kicker.”
 
I am no referee as I’m sure the rest of us aren’t but that sure seems like a defensive holding call.


ARTICLE 6. DEFENSIVE HOLDING

It is a foul for defensive holding if:

  1. a defensive player tackles or holds any opponent other than a runner, except as permitted in Article 5.
  2. during a punt, field goal attempt, or Try-kick attempt, B1 grabs and pulls an offensive player out of the way, allowing B2 to shoot the gap (pull-and-shoot) in an attempt to block the kick, except if B1 is advancing toward the kicker.”
Which isn't what happened. There are several videos that show it better. I actually know a few people associated with the NDSU program, and on that play, the kid is literally coached to play for a penalty flag if the corner doesn't bite on the end around. Heck, the NDSU kid didn't even try to sell it until the play was over.
 
2:15:24 dude gets grabbed and falls down… ruined the whole play. With that being said what the hell was that play anyways.

I've seen that argument made. Was it a hold or was it a good block? I don't see him holding on to anything. I see a DB keeping his position and a TE losing his footing, but I don't see the DB holding on to anything illegally there.

You've mentioned to me before that you know an offensive lineman that is an FCS level player. Ask him if that was holding. I'm not being snippy, I'd love to hear his thoughts.

Also, if we are all honest, refs could call holding on at least half the plays in a game if they wanted. (this wasn't one of them, though). They try to only do it if it actually effected the play. Go look at Gubner's jersey against SDSU in the national championship. He was obviously being held a LOT or a jersey doesn't tear like that. We aren't out here complaining.
 
This is my take…
1. UM
Going to be ranked high off of last season but they lost the qb who changed their season, their best OL players, Gubner, and other significant defensive talent. They replaced big time through portal but those players also have question marks. If the gris can use their talented wr core and solid rbs they could be a phenomenal offense but they will need a good qb and a solid OL which have questions.
2. MSU
Didn’t graduate many but lost some of their top talent on OL and DL. I think the portal losses have been replaced but those players can have question marks. Possibly the best OL and best RB core in the FCS should result in a strong run offense but they will need to pass to become the best team. The defense has some question marks but the cats return lots of top defensive players.
3. Davis
4. Idaho
5. Sac
6. NAU
7. Weber
8. Idaho St
9. EW
10. PSU
11. Cal Poly
12. Northern Colorado
 
I've seen that argument made. Was it a hold or was it a good block? I don't see him holding on to anything. I see a DB keeping his position and a TE losing his footing, but I don't see the DB holding on to anything illegally there.

You've mentioned to me before that you know an offensive lineman that is an FCS level player. Ask him if that was holding. I'm not being snippy, I'd love to hear his thoughts.

Also, if we are all honest, refs could call holding on at least half the plays in a game if they wanted. (this wasn't one of them, though). They try to only do it if it actually effected the play. Go look at Gubner's jersey against SDSU in the national championship. He was obviously being held a LOT or a jersey doesn't tear like that. We aren't out here complaining.
Yeah I’m no referee but as a biased fan that looked like hold but who knows. I also think if they called this then WaGris might’ve killed the guy. Gub gets held all the time and we all know tons of offensive holding never gets called… but in that case it wouldn’t have changed the game like the NDSU UM holding call would’ve.
 
Yeah I’m no referee but as a biased fan that looked like hold but who knows. I also think if they called this then WaGris might’ve killed the guy. Gub gets held all the time and we all know tons of offensive holding never gets called… but in that case it wouldn’t have changed the game like the NDSU UM holding call would’ve.
Yea, I just don't see the hold. I see good coverage. The DB/LB still has a right to his position, and they were keeping their position without grabbing at all, in my view. They don't just have to move out of the way, the TE needed to make a move and he just didn't even attempt to actually make a move and get open, he just kind of ran into the coverage and fell down.

You're right that we are both biased, though, and that's all good. I definitely am, so no judgement. But I don't think my eyes are lying to me.

Also, WaGriz wouldn't have killed the guy. Just a light beating. Very few weapons. We aren't monsters.
 
My wild assed guess is that UM and MSU are clearly the class of the league. After that the water gets a bit murky. After those two, I would say it's a crap shoot between Davis, Weber, Sac and UI. The rest will be scrambling to not finish in the cellar. Clearly ISU and NOCO are teams that showed improvement on the field. Maybe not in the win column, but were much more competitive. Some of the others are just train wrecks.
 
Well for starters your WR (bergen threw a ball that was tipped into the hands of a receiver.

Dude the te got held so hard that he fell down… I don’t care who you root for, that was an obvious call.
That's some classic loser bub whining right there. Lil brother strikes again!
 
I am no referee as I’m sure the rest of us aren’t but that sure seems like a defensive holding call.


ARTICLE 6. DEFENSIVE HOLDING

It is a foul for defensive holding if:

  1. a defensive player tackles or holds any opponent other than a runner, except as permitted in Article 5.
  2. during a punt, field goal attempt, or Try-kick attempt, B1 grabs and pulls an offensive player out of the way, allowing B2 to shoot the gap (pull-and-shoot) in an attempt to block the kick, except if B1 is advancing toward the kicker.”
It wasn’t holding. The TE was blocking.
 
After reading some incredibly weak barbs and some piss poor rationale from the bub faithful, the only conclusion I can make is it takes about 7-8 months for the kittens to either lick their wounds or forget what happened in November. All seem to be feeling themselves a little bit too much after last years failures.
 
Maybe I misunderstood your point. I thought you said the Cats weren't good last season, and they're going to be worse in 2024? If that's the case, they should lose at least four regular season games, correct?
I said, at 8-4, the Cats weren't very good last season. Are you saying that 8-4 and loss of the first playoff game at home, is what you consider a good season? However, I had first asked why the Cats would be better this year. You and others have not been able to say why the Cats would be better this season. Someone said new OC/DC's might make them better. I'm not looking for "might" stuff. Explain why the Cats will be better this season, and provide specific support. Otherwise, quit wasting our time.
 
You should check out the MSU OL in 22. They had just lost Kidd, Tuiasosopo, Redd, and Session. Guess what… they broke almost all rushing records the next year. Goes to show how talented the 2s are. This year the line should be Moore (6’5” 306), Wehr (6’4” 292), Sain (6’4” 292), Perkins (6’ 282), Reed (6’3” 277), then transfers- Samora Ezekiel (North Texas so. 6’2” 270) and Dylan Rollins (6’6” 295 4 years of eligibility)… and I didnt name two other redshirt sophomores who are 6’4” 290+.

Yes the 3 transfers hurt but this should be the best OL MSU has had since I can remember. So many starts for this squad and most aren’t seniors. I would love to go through all positions and explain the depth… I will say the only position where I sense a slight lack of depth is at LB.
Your o-line is small. Do any top FCS teams have o-lines that small?

Why don't you list the number of starts for this o-line group. Figure it out for us, and post it.

I call BS on your statement that this will be the Cats' best o-line for as long as you can remember. Please, don't say dumb stuff like that in this forum.
 
I do. But I also think the Griz were better than NAU so I might be nuts.
You should look at the final FCS poll. That will help you. UM was better than Idaho or MSU. Idaho was better than MSU. All of them, including UM, were better than NAU.

Please don't say dumb things like MSU was better than Idaho. MSU wasn't better. Idaho beat MSU. Idaho was seeded higher than MSU. Idaho ended the season ranked higher than MSU.

What possible argument can you make that MSU was better than Idaho?
 
Back
Top