GRZFTBL said:Emily Adamson NBC MT @EmilyNBCMT
Anderson says Assistant Dean of Pharmacy School, emailed and asked her to come see her. Says they talked about testimony. #JohnsonTrial
:roll:
GrizMusician said:Holly Anderson's testimony is going to really hurt the prosecution's case.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
mcg said:mtgrizfankb said:that's a trap question for JJ. Cause if he answers I usually do....it looks like he raped her.wbtfg said:Pardon me while I try to play legal pundit for the moment.....
One lingering question for me about this trial is the idea of not using a condom. I've heard that disucussing past sexual partners is not admissible, but I'm kind of surprised neither Jane Doe, nor JJ were asked about whether it's common for them to have unprotected sex, as I assume neither were virgins before that night. It would seem the answer to that question (assuming judge would allow) potentially could have opened a pandora's box one way or the other (maybe that's why no one asked the question?).
Do any of the legal minds have thoughts on this?
if he says no I don't.....he looks like a sleez ball.
jj wanted to avoid that question.
that is why they made it obvious that she asked him and he said he didn't have one. Meaning he did not intend the sex before, and she said "its OK" which leads him to believe consent.
That worked in his favor. The prosecution, maybe should have asked that question. but I guess must have had reason not to.
Is "It's OK" in the testimony somewhere? Might not "It's OK" be interpreted as consent?
GrizMusician said:GRZFTBL said:Emily Adamson NBC MT @EmilyNBCMT
Anderson says Assistant Dean of Pharmacy School, emailed and asked her to come see her. Says they talked about testimony. #JohnsonTrial
:roll:
Definitely doesn't look good for the dean's testimony.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
trying to say, accuser does not seem to be upset. someone with all the same classes has never seen her cryEverettGriz said:Any guesses why this witness was called by Defense? It seems there must be something big coming.
mtgrizfankb said:trying to say, accuser does not seem to be upset. someone with all the same classes has never seen her cryEverettGriz said:Any guesses why this witness was called by Defense? It seems there must be something big coming.
EverettGriz said:Any guesses why this witness was called by Defense? It seems there must be something big coming.
wbtfg said:EverettGriz said:Any guesses why this witness was called by Defense? It seems there must be something big coming.
I was thinking the same thing, but kind of fell flat of what I was expecting. I'm not sure this witness helped the defense.
GRZFTBL said:mtgrizfankb said:trying to say, accuser does not seem to be upset. someone with all the same classes has never seen her cryEverettGriz said:Any guesses why this witness was called by Defense? It seems there must be something big coming.
Which makes you wonder if there are 65 students in their pharmacy class why isn't there more saying they didn't see her cry?
fencer24 said:Usual rule is one hour each, with the prosecution splitting time before and after the defense. Exceptions can be made for longer closings, and my guess is that they will happen tomorrow.