-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Covid Updates - Not Politics
- Thread starter PlayerRep
- Start date
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
kemajic said:
Curious, why is only one side that continuously resorts to juvenile name calling...libtard, demon rat, and Evil maggots for example?
They have to be able to address the audience to which they are speaking, in terms the audience will understand. Kinda like the difference between a first grade teacher talking to a fresh batch new-to-schoolers and a high school English teacher teaching his honors class of seniors.
Jesse said:
Tell us all what you know about the War College....
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
3-7-77 said:
I assumed it was more about fear and anger than common sense.
poorgriz said:
Once again, YouTube experts save the world!
hunt-ducks
Well-known member
Hilarious reading the "truth" about Covid-19 projected from all of the scientist experts posting on egriz. Most of you couldn't pass a high school biology test. Then we have our esteemed "scientist" argh!, finally ending the conflict by providing the ultimate "truth" about Covid, from Bangladesh no less! ROFL, and from the Washington Post, no less!
I read the article three times, attempting to read the "proof" that wearing double masks really do prevent the spread of the virus. And........ NO CIGAR! This claims to fit the time-and-true parameters of scientific validation, which is a RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLINDED STUDY. But it fails miserably, and will be quickly rejected by the esteemed "Science" periodical. The problem is that there was zero randomization, and no control group.
Even more hilarious is that the supposed "experts" quoted in this article, were members of the corrupt WHO, backed by the CCP, and an emergency doctor from Brown university, possibly the most woke university in the nation! Uh, I think I'll pass on their endorsements!
Just another attempt by the liberal media to keep everyone frightened and sequestered. But, thanks again, Dan, for sharing this "proof" with us!
I read the article three times, attempting to read the "proof" that wearing double masks really do prevent the spread of the virus. And........ NO CIGAR! This claims to fit the time-and-true parameters of scientific validation, which is a RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE DOUBLE-BLINDED STUDY. But it fails miserably, and will be quickly rejected by the esteemed "Science" periodical. The problem is that there was zero randomization, and no control group.
Even more hilarious is that the supposed "experts" quoted in this article, were members of the corrupt WHO, backed by the CCP, and an emergency doctor from Brown university, possibly the most woke university in the nation! Uh, I think I'll pass on their endorsements!
Just another attempt by the liberal media to keep everyone frightened and sequestered. But, thanks again, Dan, for sharing this "proof" with us!
hunt-ducks said:
all i did was post an article, from a newspaper, not a scientific journal, sunny. you were supposed to click on the actual paper, which i didn't say provided is proof or not. i will say that the proof is obvious, any idiot can figure out that if you have the virus and breath it into a mask instead of the air, you are less likely to spread the virus. duh. anyway. also, i will add that i have posted many times about the corruption in the science world, nepotism, cronyism, old boyism, etc... your rant against "science", though, is just blathering and complaining about your perceived 'enemies'. here's the paper preprint, you lazy snowbird: https://www.poverty-action.org/sites/default/files/publications/Mask_RCT____Symptomatic_Seropositivity_083121.pdf
hunt-ducks
Well-known member
argh! said:
You're right, I did not read the actual study, but the synopsis from the newspaper article was a typical spin-job from the liberal media, jumping the gun on this topic to support an agenda. You'll have to admit however that you insinuated that this article was proof that masks work. I am friends with the head virologist at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale (he lives in my neighborhood). He maintains that the only masks which have entry pores that prevent Covid from insulting the masks are the N95 masks, which are worn by less than 5% of the population. Here's a thought........ if the virus is able to breech a single mask, why wouldn't it also be able to breech two masks made of the same type material???
About 15 years ago, I had to be FITTED, and tested for effectiveness, for a N-95 mask(as I recall)at my workplace. In short, it had to be worn properly, not haphazardly like 99% of the world bonehead population has been doing.
How many times have you seen the average lemming wearing a 'mask' while driving his goddamned Prius, windows rolled tight? I have been wearing a 'mask' to get into places I absolutely needed to go, grocery store, liquor store(oops, being redundant there), Dr.s office(annual visit, no smartassed twist intended), but my mask(s) were all T-shirt sleeves. All the protection of a dust mask, if that. I was technically compliant with 'the law' but actually in contempt of it.
I did have a few of the light blue hospital issued ear hinged masks, but only to express my contempt and disgust for the stupidity of having to wear it. I'd write something like 'F**k Fauci' on it, which elicited plenty of thumbs up and hoots. Masks, other than N-95s, are a joke and are useful only for the gullible, providing a false sense of security.
How many times have you seen the average lemming wearing a 'mask' while driving his goddamned Prius, windows rolled tight? I have been wearing a 'mask' to get into places I absolutely needed to go, grocery store, liquor store(oops, being redundant there), Dr.s office(annual visit, no smartassed twist intended), but my mask(s) were all T-shirt sleeves. All the protection of a dust mask, if that. I was technically compliant with 'the law' but actually in contempt of it.
I did have a few of the light blue hospital issued ear hinged masks, but only to express my contempt and disgust for the stupidity of having to wear it. I'd write something like 'F**k Fauci' on it, which elicited plenty of thumbs up and hoots. Masks, other than N-95s, are a joke and are useful only for the gullible, providing a false sense of security.
horribilisfan8184
Well-known member
3-7-77 said:
Fauci knows this well, he said so in his first comments that non-N-95 masking was essential useless. The science hasn't changed, just the political pressure.
horribilisfan8184 said:
non-n95 masks are valuable to stop you from spreading the disease, you can still get it while wearing them. but that point has only been made, like, a trillion times. but whatever, get your information from those geniuses on youtube, who tell you to get the virus, which will make you stronger. i assume from your posts that you need that extra strength.
horribilisfan8184
Well-known member
horribilisfan8184 said:
horribilisfan8184 said:
bringing up something that was debated two years ago. go ahead, ignore that it is the unvaccinated that make up the vast majority of the hospitalizations that we're paying for, and worse. be as dumb as you want, it is your "right". we don't need to go over the basics again on egriz.
