-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
Could Montana's Brady Gustafson Be the Next Carson Wentz?
- Thread starter oGriz
- Start date
- Status
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
reinell30 said:
Are you suggesting that Bob Stitt had a better option at QB last season?
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
Gaeilge1 said:
I don't think he makes a CFL team.
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
I am not sure that would have been the case. Wishful thinking on your part.
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
BG being the starter against UNC would guarantee nothing. It would seem to be wishful thinking by whomever you spoke. And it seems that BG did play against MSU, and played poorly in a loss.
HelenaHandBasket said:
BG was the best QB on the team. He has sufficiently healed to start against UNC. He was apparently told he would start, and then didn't. Irked some players. His backup didn't play well, resulting in a loss. The UNC would have helped get the mini rust out for BG. Would have beaten the Cats.
I will take my sources over your unknowledgeable, uninformed and uneducated guesses anytime. You don't have to agree with me, but my statement was based on considerably more than wishful thinking.
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
PR, for being a self proclaimed smart person, it is pure speculation on both you and your sources part in assuming a victory if BG started against UNC. You are making it sound like it would have been a slam dunk, and I am afraid to tell you it was far from that. It is also nothing but speculation that they would have beaten the cats based on the ol' "he wouldn't have been rusty" excuse. Could they have won at UNC if BG played...maybe....maybe not.
HelenaHandBasket said:
When I get info from players, in fact starters, on the team, I feel confident in my info. No, I didn't say it was a slam dunk. However, it is far from speculation.
I find it interesting how often that people who have no information and haven't talked to anyone in the know, and who often don't have much knowledge of the game, can declare that people who have good information are wrong. You are one of the worst offenders. Just because you don't know what's going on with the program doesn't mean that some of the rest of us don't know. You don't have to agree; in fact, you can disagree. But don't me my info is wrong or speculation. It isn't.
I suppose you are going to tell PlayerDad that he doesn't know what he's talking about with the o-line. Ha. I used to love the posters who told me I was wrong about what O'Day had done or said, when I had just talked to him or texted him (and verified that my info was correct).
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
PlayerRep said:
Actually, it is nothing but speculation.
sdk.catfish
Well-known member
Speculation and Bullshit. Normally I respect PR's take on things and recognize that he has connections to the inner workings of this team that many of us do not. However, I don't believe that if any of the three QB's last year were have to started every game the record would have came out different. In 2016 the Montana Grizzly's were a 6-5 football team - that is what they were and that is what we all deserved. This is totally my opinion, and while I have stated it before I know few listen. It isn't the QB. It is Stitt's offensive scheme which, unless modified this year, will result in another 6-5 season. He has talent on this team - he should quit being so f.........ing locked into the past that he - can't (or won't get a chance to see) the future.
Okay.sdk.catfish said:
What offense specifically should he run?
And why would him running an offense he isn't familiar with be a better option? Won't we have the same problem we had with the Delaney Pflu-Hybrid/Power Football/Sort of Spread offenses before?
sdk.catfish
Well-known member
Well I don't think that Delaney running a Pflu-Hybrid power football sort of spread offense was ever a viable option given his predication to a run first type scheme. I acknowledge that Stitt might be just as uncomfortable adopting a power football mentality. But the offensive line seems confused and really doesn't seem to know when to fire and when to protect.
Sometimes a little more radical change becomes a more comfortable option as the status quo continues without success. Maybe success will come with the present system. We shall all see come next November.
PlayerRep said:
I don't have any idea if we would have won the last two games,,,however, I attended the unc game and the word that morning and before the game was that gus was healthy and starting......I do think p.r. is correct in that gus could have played..... it could not have been any worse and maybe a whole lot better if he had....imo.
So not even picked up as a free agent. Might eventually get picked up as a camp arm... His performance in the NFLPA Bowl really hurt his stock. If the question is whether Brady made Stitt's offense work OR Stitt's offense helped showcase some of Brady's strengths, I'm leaning towards the latter. I really appreciate Brady's work and some of the great moments he provided, but I do think that at least one of the current QB's will open up new, much-needed wrinkles in Stitt's offense. Because they all need seasoning on the field it might take a few games, but if we don't see the offense opening up by the end of the year then I'll be as ready as anyone to pin the blame on Stitt.
HelenaHandBasket
Well-known member
Ursus1 said:
FIFY
- Status
