So how many years is the postseason ban again?
EverettGriz said:So how many years is the postseason ban again?
BadlandsGrizFan said:EverettGriz said:So how many years is the postseason ban again?
6 vacated seasons.
tourist said:Sounds like wishful thinking on the part of a couple posters, but what the hell......17! You'll note that 2011/CDA/PR have been AWOL from this thread for 32 hours now. You may want to send the MPs out looking for them.
tourist said:Discussion on this topic by the main three seems to have disappeared like a fart in the wind about noon yesterday. What happened? That is not how to get to 17 pages. Second string, next UP!
SoldierGriz said:Well, here's the typical investigation timeline for our undsu visitors. Let me know if you guys need someone to read it to you.
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/2/16/17011812/ncaa-violation-timeline-investigation
CDAGRIZ said:SoldierGriz said:Well, here's the typical investigation timeline for our undsu visitors. Let me know if you guys need someone to read it to you.
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/2/16/17011812/ncaa-violation-timeline-investigation
Scary accurate. I know from personal experience #3 is often a step the cleaner programs take for potential minor (secondary) violations. I briefly worked in compliance for a fairly prominent Pac-12 school nearly ten years ago. Several instances of marginally improper recruiting contact was self-reported and nothing really came of it.
That said, nothing approximating this situation ever came through the office. No failed drug tests; no questions of improper benefits (though we did have one SA ask if she could eat Thanksgiving dinner with a teammate's family. She could). If something like the situation in Fargo came to light, I can George Foreman Guarantee it would have been internally investigated, but I can't say for sure it would have been self-reported given the potential penalties. Put another way, I bet the T-Buff compliance department is already investigating this, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they don't self-report in advance of any NCAA investigation.
2011BisonAlumni said:CDAGRIZ said:SoldierGriz said:Well, here's the typical investigation timeline for our undsu visitors. Let me know if you guys need someone to read it to you.
https://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2018/2/16/17011812/ncaa-violation-timeline-investigation
Scary accurate. I know from personal experience #3 is often a step the cleaner programs take for potential minor (secondary) violations. I briefly worked in compliance for a fairly prominent Pac-12 school nearly ten years ago. Several instances of marginally improper recruiting contact was self-reported and nothing really came of it.
That said, nothing approximating this situation ever came through the office. No failed drug tests; no questions of improper benefits (though we did have one SA ask if she could eat Thanksgiving dinner with a teammate's family. She could). If something like the situation in Fargo came to light, I can George Foreman Guarantee it would have been internally investigated, but I can't say for sure it would have been self-reported given the potential penalties. Put another way, I bet the T-Buff compliance department is already investigating this, but it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they don't self-report in advance of any NCAA investigation.
What is the lastest Sherlock?
You rang?AllWeatherFan said:Band?