2012 Wide Receiver logjam

[Growler1]

What does each one of them run then?

If I have to explain things like this to you, you shouldn't be posting on a football site.

 

[HighLineGRIZ]

"Research"????? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: What, he carried a pad and pen around at practice? :thumb:

Thanks for proving that you'll more than likely not contribute anything of value to this thread.

It's much much easier putting down others' opinions than putting the effort into stating your own. Or lying...

My post criticizing Brint's flowery evaluation is the most valid and accurate post in this thread. I notice that I have already been misquoted by AZgrizfan. Re-read my post, it should be quite clear to anyone with half a brain, that I never stated that we did not have some great young receivers, nor did I say that we did not have any with speed. I merely said that to label this group of UNTESTED receivers as wonderful is a stretch at best. How can anyone evaluate kids that have taken few, if any game-time snaps? These kids could be the next Mariani, or a total bust. But, Brint has no clue about that, nor does anybody else on this board.

By the way, I totally agree that anyone could see that Jefferson Heidlberger was fast as hell as a true freshman.

The real football minds on this board know that my points are valid. Way to much hype by certain posters. Makes one question whether they could be objective about anything in life!

All I see is you dissing Brint and then calling everybody that agrees with him "lemmings". Your response to me that I'm quoting, is the only post from you in this thread that has substance in it. Much of it I actually agree with you on. I do disagree with you having to resort to name calling without providing any sort of constructive arguments with points and reason. Guess that might be too difficult for you. Hell, one poster tried to engage you in conversation about speed and you repond with nothing but "you're not worthy of my answer". The fact that you can't engage in football conversation without name calling makes you a very unpleasant poster, even if I do agree with you on alot of points.

 

[moose/squirrel]

Thanks for proving that you'll more than likely not contribute anything of value to this thread.

It's much much easier putting down others' opinions than putting the effort into stating your own. Or lying...

My post criticizing Brint's flowery evaluation is the most valid and accurate post in this thread. I notice that I have already been misquoted by AZgrizfan. Re-read my post, it should be quite clear to anyone with half a brain, that I never stated that we did not have some great young receivers, nor did I say that we did not have any with speed. I merely said that to label this group of UNTESTED receivers as wonderful is a stretch at best. How can anyone evaluate kids that have taken few, if any game-time snaps? These kids could be the next Mariani, or a total bust. But, Brint has no clue about that, nor does anybody else on this board.

By the way, I totally agree that anyone could see that Jefferson Heidlberger was fast as hell as a true freshman.

The real football minds on this board know that my points are valid. Way to much hype by certain posters. Makes one question whether they could be objective about anything in life!

All I see is you dissing Brint and then calling everybody that agrees with him "lemmings". Your response to me that I'm quoting, is the only post from you in this thread that has substance in it. Much of it I actually agree with you on. I do disagree with you having to resort to name calling without providing any sort of constructive arguments with points and reason. Guess that might be too difficult for you. Hell, one poster tried to engage you in conversation about speed and you repond with nothing but "you're not worthy of my answer". The fact that you can't engage in football conversation without name calling makes you a very unpleasant poster, even if I do agree with you on alot of points.

Kind of par for the course when dealing with "the human quaalude".

 

[AZGrizFan]

#81 Mitch Saylor - 6-5 and 210 pounds and good speed off the line of scrimmage.

#80 Sean Haynes - 6-3 and 190 pounds brings a mix you don't see at the FCS level much, size and speed. He has relied on his overall speed/athletcism

#23 Cam Warren - 5-7, 160 that can easily beat coverage by LBs or safeties because of his speed and shifty route running.

#84 Kevin Berland - 5-9, 175. In the fall I was impressed with his speed
Ryan Burke, 6-4 195. Another tall/fast WR,
Chase Naccarato, 5-8 160. FAST and dominant in Spokane football, could play as a frosh
Taylor Walcott, 6-0 175. Good blend of size/speed/potential

Yep. No speed here. :lol: :lol: :lol: You Chicken Littles slay me. :? :?

Wow, lemming-up and think that because Brint writes the word "speed" into his descriptions of these receivers, that they are actually fast! You are way too easily duped, my friend. None of those receivers runs faster than a 4.5 forty. None are as fast as Mariani or Sambrano.

Here's a hint for you: any 6'3", 190 pound receiver that runs a 4.4 40 is playing for Tennessee, Florida, USC, etc. Sambrano didn't run a 4.4 40. Mariani didn't run a 4.4 40. And honestly, there's "fast", and then there's "football fast". I'd rather have somebody that's fast with pads on than some guy that can run a 4.4 40 but can't outrun coverage when he pads up.

What EXACTLY is your point, except to insist that you disagree with everything BW writes?

 

[jcu27]

He likes sniffing BW's jock.

 

[jcu27]

He likes sniffing BW's jock.

 

[Brock Landers]

What does each one of them run then?

If I have to explain things like this to you, you shouldn't be posting on a football site.

Yeah... see that's the overwhelming consensus on you here, on AGS, probably on CS with whatever handle you got yourself ran off with at some point, the old Griz board you got shut down, etc.

If you were my dad, I'd tell him to quick publicly embarrassing himself on a constant basis You're the lowest common denominator, which in eGriz is a massive f#$king achievement

 

[Brock Landers]

Man I can't believe I actually felt sorry for your gnomer ass when Alpha posted that video :lol: Love the short shorts

 

[AZGrizFan]

What does each one of them run then?

If I have to explain things like this to you, you shouldn't be posting on a football site.

Yeah... see that's the overwhelming consensus on you here, on AGS, probably on CS with whatever handle you got yourself ran off with at some point, the old Griz board you got shut down, etc.

If you were my dad, I'd tell him to quick publicly embarrassing himself on a constant basis You're the lowest common denominator, which in eGriz is a massive f#$king achievement

All he's telling you with the statement "if I have to explain things like this to you" is that he has no fucking clue what they run. But if Brint posted it, it MUST be wrong. :lol: :lol:

 

[WyomingGrizFan]

What does each one of them run then?

If I have to explain things like this to you, you shouldn't be posting on a football site.

Yeah... see that's the overwhelming consensus on you here, on AGS, probably on CS with whatever handle you got yourself ran off with at some point, the old Griz board you got shut down, etc.

If you were my dad, I'd tell him to quick publicly embarrassing himself on a constant basis You're the lowest common denominator, which in eGriz is a massive f#$king achievement

All he's telling you with the statement "if I have to explain things like this to you" is that he has no f***[*] clue what they run. But if Brint posted it, it MUST be wrong. :lol: :lol:

Damn. Now go and see what you've done. You've let the cat out of the bag. Now everybody knows. When will they ever learn. Oh well.

 

[AZGrizFan]

If I have to explain things like this to you, you shouldn't be posting on a football site.

Yeah... see that's the overwhelming consensus on you here, on AGS, probably on CS with whatever handle you got yourself ran off with at some point, the old Griz board you got shut down, etc.

If you were my dad, I'd tell him to quick publicly embarrassing himself on a constant basis You're the lowest common denominator, which in eGriz is a massive f#$king achievement

All he's telling you with the statement "if I have to explain things like this to you" is that he has no f***[*] clue what they run. But if Brint posted it, it MUST be wrong. :lol: :lol:

Damn. Now go and see what you've done. You've let the cat out of the bag. Now everybody knows. When will they ever learn. Oh well.

My apologies.

 

[Growler1]

Yeah... see that's the overwhelming consensus on you here, on AGS, probably on CS with whatever handle you got yourself ran off with at some point, the old Griz board you got shut down, etc.

If you were my dad, I'd tell him to quick publicly embarrassing himself on a constant basis You're the lowest common denominator, which in eGriz is a massive f#$king achievement

All he's telling you with the statement "if I have to explain things like this to you" is that he has no f***[*] clue what they run. But if Brint posted it, it MUST be wrong. :lol: :lol:

Damn. Now go and see what you've done. You've let the cat out of the bag. Now everybody knows. When will they ever learn. Oh well.

My apologies.

Lemmings, to the person. I do not waste keystrokes educating sugar-coating pedestrian fans about the game of football. I discuss it only with the few knowledgeable posters on this board. None of you who responded to Cock Slanders' post are in that category.

 

[Growler1]

#81 Mitch Saylor - 6-5 and 210 pounds and good speed off the line of scrimmage.

#80 Sean Haynes - 6-3 and 190 pounds brings a mix you don't see at the FCS level much, size and speed. He has relied on his overall speed/athletcism

#23 Cam Warren - 5-7, 160 that can easily beat coverage by LBs or safeties because of his speed and shifty route running.

#84 Kevin Berland - 5-9, 175. In the fall I was impressed with his speed
Ryan Burke, 6-4 195. Another tall/fast WR,
Chase Naccarato, 5-8 160. FAST and dominant in Spokane football, could play as a frosh
Taylor Walcott, 6-0 175. Good blend of size/speed/potential

Yep. No speed here. :lol: :lol: :lol: You Chicken Littles slay me. :? :?

Wow, lemming-up and think that because Brint writes the word "speed" into his descriptions of these receivers, that they are actually fast! You are way too easily duped, my friend. None of those receivers runs faster than a 4.5 forty. None are as fast as Mariani or Sambrano.

Here's a hint for you: any 6'3", 190 pound receiver that runs a 4.4 40 is playing for Tennessee, Florida, USC, etc. Sambrano didn't run a 4.4 40. Mariani didn't run a 4.4 40. And honestly, there's "fast", and then there's "football fast". I'd rather have somebody that's fast with pads on than some guy that can run a 4.4 40 but can't outrun coverage when he pads up.

What EXACTLY is your point, except to insist that you disagree with everything BW writes?

As usual, you are full of sh*t, and just proved itonce again. ZZZZZZZZZ . Both Mariani and Zambrano ran 4.4 forties. Pedestrian. NEXT!

 

[Growler1]

It's much much easier putting down others' opinions than putting the effort into stating your own. Or lying...

My post criticizing Brint's flowery evaluation is the most valid and accurate post in this thread. I notice that I have already been misquoted by AZgrizfan. Re-read my post, it should be quite clear to anyone with half a brain, that I never stated that we did not have some great young receivers, nor did I say that we did not have any with speed. I merely said that to label this group of UNTESTED receivers as wonderful is a stretch at best. How can anyone evaluate kids that have taken few, if any game-time snaps? These kids could be the next Mariani, or a total bust. But, Brint has no clue about that, nor does anybody else on this board.

By the way, I totally agree that anyone could see that Jefferson Heidlberger was fast as hell as a true freshman.

The real football minds on this board know that my points are valid. Way to much hype by certain posters. Makes one question whether they could be objective about anything in life!

All I see is you dissing Brint and then calling everybody that agrees with him "lemmings". Your response to me that I'm quoting, is the only post from you in this thread that has substance in it. Much of it I actually agree with you on. I do disagree with you having to resort to name calling without providing any sort of constructive arguments with points and reason. Guess that might be too difficult for you. Hell, one poster tried to engage you in conversation about speed and you repond with nothing but "you're not worthy of my answer". The fact that you can't engage in football conversation without name calling makes you a very unpleasant poster, even if I do agree with you on alot of points.

Kind of par for the course when dealing with "the human quaalude".

Do have to plagiarize all of your smack, or just this one?

 

[Growler1]

He likes sniffing BW's jock.

Better than sniffing glue, which is one of your pastimes.

 

[Brock Landers]

I can't tell who's defense mechanisms amuse me more; lakesbison or Dill :lol:

We need a thread with those two


Anyways, whatever happened to the Bozeman kid that left Auburn. Wisner?

 

[griz4life]

Wisner went back to Auburn.

 

[AZGrizFan]

Yep. No speed here. :lol: :lol: :lol: You Chicken Littles slay me. :? :?

Wow, lemming-up and think that because Brint writes the word "speed" into his descriptions of these receivers, that they are actually fast! You are way too easily duped, my friend. None of those receivers runs faster than a 4.5 forty. None are as fast as Mariani or Sambrano.

Here's a hint for you: any 6'3", 190 pound receiver that runs a 4.4 40 is playing for Tennessee, Florida, USC, etc. Sambrano didn't run a 4.4 40. Mariani didn't run a 4.4 40. And honestly, there's "fast", and then there's "football fast". I'd rather have somebody that's fast with pads on than some guy that can run a 4.4 40 but can't outrun coverage when he pads up.

What EXACTLY is your point, except to insist that you disagree with everything BW writes?

As usual, you are full of sh*t, and just proved itonce again. ZZZZZZZZZ . Both Mariani and Zambrano ran 4.4 forties. Pedestrian. NEXT!

Really? Sambrano's best 40 time at his pro day was 4.47. That's a hell of a lot closer to 4.5 than it is to 4.4.

Try again, Myron.

 

[Growler1]

Wow, lemming-up and think that because Brint writes the word "speed" into his descriptions of these receivers, that they are actually fast! You are way too easily duped, my friend. None of those receivers runs faster than a 4.5 forty. None are as fast as Mariani or Sambrano.

Here's a hint for you: any 6'3", 190 pound receiver that runs a 4.4 40 is playing for Tennessee, Florida, USC, etc. Sambrano didn't run a 4.4 40. Mariani didn't run a 4.4 40. And honestly, there's "fast", and then there's "football fast". I'd rather have somebody that's fast with pads on than some guy that can run a 4.4 40 but can't outrun coverage when he pads up.

What EXACTLY is your point, except to insist that you disagree with everything BW writes?

As usual, you are full of sh*t, and just proved itonce again. ZZZZZZZZZ . Both Mariani and Zambrano ran 4.4 forties. Pedestrian. NEXT!

Really? Sambrano's best 40 time at his pro day was 4.47. That's a hell of a lot closer to 4.5 than it is to 4.4.

Try again, Myron.

Really? The conditions on pro day were awful, and everyone ran much slower times that day than the were timed previously. Nice try, but WRONG AGAIN! Next!

 

[BWahlberg]

Wait... G1 - the pro day conditions were awful?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFaSchAbjBc[/youtube]

Sunshine and guys in shorts and t-shirts... looks pretty terrible.