• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

whoops

Status
Not open for further replies.
WaGriz4life said:
jcu27 said:
Oh and on the brain cell comment. It's been proven marijuana doesn't burn brain cells or anything. They are thinking it might produce more if anything. Do some studying, when you don't know shit.


Earlier you stated "Uhm too bad it's illegal to do studies on marijuana."...But now "It's been proven marijuana doesn't burn brain cells or anything" Hmmm...I bet you just changed the definition of illegal so you could do a study on the effects of marijuana on your fried little brain...good job!
Actually JCU is right, heavy marijuana use has been shown not to kill brain cells. In fact, even the most basic "side effects" that people associate with marijauna like slow reation time are being proven to be false.
Here is one article

http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/news/20030701/heavy-marijuana-use-doesnt-damage-brain" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I just laugh at all the people who have a hard time reading and just want to argue...my point was in one post JCU said studies were illegal...then he states that it has been proven, I presume, in a study, which he states is illegal, that marijuana does not effect your brain....just curious if this was a legal or illegal study. Never did argue his "facts". So WaGriz...was your "reation" time a little slow while typing?
 
rgrizfan said:
WaGriz4life said:
jcu27 said:
Oh and on the brain cell comment. It's been proven marijuana doesn't burn brain cells or anything. They are thinking it might produce more if anything. Do some studying, when you don't know shit.


Earlier you stated "Uhm too bad it's illegal to do studies on marijuana."...But now "It's been proven marijuana doesn't burn brain cells or anything" Hmmm...I bet you just changed the definition of illegal so you could do a study on the effects of marijuana on your fried little brain...good job!
Actually JCU is right, heavy marijuana use has been shown not to kill brain cells. In fact, even the most basic "side effects" that people associate with marijauna like slow reation time are being proven to be false.
Here is one article

http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/news/20030701/heavy-marijuana-use-doesnt-damage-brain" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

I just laugh at all the people who have a hard time reading and just want to argue...my point was in one post JCU said studies were illegal...then he states that it has been proven, I presume, in a study, which he states is illegal, that marijuana does not effect your brain....just curious if this was a legal or illegal study. Never did argue his "facts". So WaGriz...was your "reation" time a little slow while typing?
They can test on mice. But here is a link to explain some stuff to you.
http://blog.norml.org/2010/01/27/why-isn%E2%80%99t-there-more-medical-marijuana-research-because-the-feds-won%E2%80%99t-allow-it-that%E2%80%99s-why/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
 
All I know is that this would not have been possible without weed.

tumblr_m16d283rfu1qhs82ho1_250.gif
 
Let's get this thread back on track. A big Happy Birthday to William Shatner. The Shat just weighed in at 81 years young. Here's to another 81 years of brilliant acting and kick-ass spoken word albums.
 
The awesomeness of this thread cannot be described. It's better than UNI Panther Basketball.
 
poorgriz said:
jcu27 said:
wbtfg said:
how many pots have you smoken?
How many pots? lol..

WOW. I think this little exchange says a lot. :clap: I'm hoping jcu was just kidding here but probably not. Also classic that PlayRape is backing jcu as a "good"poster...
How many pots doesn't even make sense. No one says pots. Pot, yes. The way he said it was just retarded. I don't know how much weed I've smoked total. I don't count it up.
 
Why do you suppose that JJ had a lawyer before the temporary restraining order was served? Must have known it was forthcoming, huh? Either that or he was trying to be pre-emptive with the bigger issue.
 
Griz 'n said:
Why do you suppose that JJ had a lawyer before the temporary restraining order was served? Must have known it was forthcoming, huh? Either that or he was trying to be pre-emptive with the bigger issue.

Interesting, how do you or any of us know that he had a lawyer prior to the tro?
 
What I want to know is, why does Fred Flintstone keep driving past that same rock, and that same cloud, and that same tree, over and over again? I'm starting to think there's some funny business going on.

1127.jpg
 
jcu27 said:
poorgriz said:
jcu27 said:
wbtfg said:
how many pots have you smoken?
How many pots? lol..

WOW. I think this little exchange says a lot. :clap: I'm hoping jcu was just kidding here but probably not. Also classic that PlayRape is backing jcu as a "good"poster...
How many pots doesn't even make sense. No one says pots. Pot, yes. The way he said it was just retarded. I don't know how much weed I've smoked total. I don't count it up.

Are you for real? Do you honestly think wbtfg was being serious with the sentence structure in that question? The fact that you didn't catch the humor in that post... tells me that you are either not very bright... or too stoned to figure that out. (Pssst... "Smoken" isn't a word either, in case you're just getting to that part of the question.)
 
AllWeatherFan said:
What I want to know is, why does Fred Flintstone keep driving past that same rock, and that same cloud, and that same tree, over and over again? I'm starting to think there's some funny business going on.

1127.jpg

I think your onto something 8-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top