• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

What Big Sky Conference Teams make the playoffs in 2013?

Playoff bid process. UM sells tickets. (Hey that's us!) if we get in we probably get one home game. At 9-2 we definitely will. $.
 
Eriul said:
Expanded playoffs

The expanded field is not just "at large" teams. It includes additional conference champions which have not been given a slot in the past. An 8-4 Grizzlies can get into the playoffs. Yet to a large extent that will be determined by how many other teams around the country are also sitting with three or four losses. As well as who those teams beat/lost to. .

Havre, I'm not trying to jinx anything. I want our Griz in the playoffs. I've been watching these 1AA/FCS playoffs since the beginning. I know anything is possible when the pairings are announced. I also know that based on the criteria typically used an 8-4 Montana will be in a very weak position to catch a break. When the committee is considering the teams with three/four losses, in part they'll consider the following. None of which favor our Grizzlies:

A) How many of those losses were to FBS teams?
B) Does the team own any wins over an FBS team?
C) Is there a 'quality' win over an FCS high ranking team (ie... No. Iowa pounding McNeese)?
D) Is a team on a roll (won their fianl five games, or lost three of their last five games)?

An 8-4 Montana team may get a playoff shot. Yet it is far less likely than some may think. If there is a large log jam of teams with 8-4 & 8-3 records don't be shocked if the Grizzlies sit at home.

None the less, our 2013 Grizzlies completely control their own fate. This team shouldn't finish at 8-4. If they win out we're earning a bye and second round home game. If they win three of our final four they're in the playoffs with a first round home game. Losing two of these final four may get them in but it is far from certain.
:ugeek:
 
Eriul said:
I dunno why you guys think we won't make the playoffs... our schedule is pretty easy... we only need to win 2 of 4 to pretty much be a lock

Because we are the worst team in the country and the coaches all have mental disabilities.
 
Tokyogriz said:
Expanded brackets...

EWU, NAU, MSU and UM. Sadly I Really Really don't see UM going deep into the playoffs based on this season performance and the game will not be a home game.
Griz are in at 8-4 or better.

I GUARANTEE the first game is a home game. :thumb:
 
big kahuna said:
At 9-3, it's playoffs are a lock and you should start reserving hotel rooms in Missoula.

At 8-4, we are likely in, but a home game would be a tough get.

Edit: I now see this was already pointed out to you. If UM is not seeded in the top 8, and thus has to play a game in round 1, then it will have a home game based on its bid--unless bids no longer used.
 
Grizzlies1982 said:
Eriul said:
Expanded playoffs

The expanded field is not just "at large" teams. It includes additional conference champions which have not been given a slot in the past. An 8-4 Grizzlies can get into the playoffs. Yet to a large extent that will be determined by how many other teams around the country are also sitting with three or four losses. As well as who those teams beat/lost to. .

Havre, I'm not trying to jinx anything. I want our Griz in the playoffs. I've been watching these 1AA/FCS playoffs since the beginning. I know anything is possible when the pairings are announced. I also know that based on the criteria typically used an 8-4 Montana will be in a very weak position to catch a break. When the committee is considering the teams with three/four losses, in part they'll consider the following. None of which favor our Grizzlies:

A) How many of those losses were to FBS teams?
B) Does the team own any wins over an FBS team?
C) Is there a 'quality' win over an FCS high ranking team (ie... No. Iowa pounding McNeese)?
D) Is a team on a roll (won their fianl five games, or lost three of their last five games)?

An 8-4 Montana team may get a playoff shot. Yet it is far less likely than some may think. If there is a large log jam of teams with 8-4 & 8-3 records don't be shocked if the Grizzlies sit at home.

None the less, our 2013 Grizzlies completely control their own fate. This team shouldn't finish at 8-4. If they win out we're earning a bye and second round home game. If they win three of our final four they're in the playoffs with a first round home game. Losing two of these final four may get them in but it is far from certain.
:ugeek:

Great summation


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
havgrizfan said:
As we speak, TSN has the Griz playing Bryant in the first round with the winner going to EWU. I doubt very much TSN is basing that on the Griz winning out either. Interstingly, they also have the Cats hosting in the first round with the winner going to NDSU. I'm sure they're basing it on thinking the Cats last loss will come at EWU and that will drop them. We shall see.

Do any of you geniuses realize the Griz have made the playoffs NUMEROUS TIMES, when they went 8-3 and 8-4 even. Or 9-3 in other 12 game seasons? And twice they were 8-3 with a share of the Big Sky, but did not receive the auto bid, and STILL PLAYED AT HOME in the first round and that was when it was a 16-team playoff!!! Or are all the people saying the Griz might not make it only fans from 2011 on?

Those whole "sadly" stuff is pretty transparent. Some of you think if the Griz don't make it Mick will be gone. NEITHER IS GONNA HAPPEN. Mick won't be gone even if the Griz stumble, and if the Griz beat Sacto and USD they are A LOCK AND could lose to Weebs and the Cats and STILL BE IN. PERIOD. Sorry to tell ya, but those of you hoping for the worst better really start crossing your fingers and doing what you need to do to jinx the Griz.

The Sactown game will tell the tale. I only worry about that game because they Griz always struggle there. Most of their wins there have been hideous. I don't care of they win by one this week, if they get out of Sactown with a W, it's smooth sailing baby.
Who the he!! is Bryant??
 
Robsnotes4u said:
Grizzlies1982 said:
The expanded field is not just "at large" teams. It includes additional conference champions which have not been given a slot in the past. An 8-4 Grizzlies can get into the playoffs. Yet to a large extent that will be determined by how many other teams around the country are also sitting with three or four losses. As well as who those teams beat/lost to. .

Havre, I'm not trying to jinx anything. I want our Griz in the playoffs. I've been watching these 1AA/FCS playoffs since the beginning. I know anything is possible when the pairings are announced. I also know that based on the criteria typically used an 8-4 Montana will be in a very weak position to catch a break. When the committee is considering the teams with three/four losses, in part they'll consider the following. None of which favor our Grizzlies:

A) How many of those losses were to FBS teams?
B) Does the team own any wins over an FBS team?
C) Is there a 'quality' win over an FCS high ranking team (ie... No. Iowa pounding McNeese)?
D) Is a team on a roll (won their final five games, or lost three of their last five games)?

An 8-4 Montana team may get a playoff shot. Yet it is far less likely than some may think. If there is a large log jam of teams with 8-4 & 8-3 records don't be shocked if the Grizzlies sit at home.

None the less, our 2013 Grizzlies completely control their own fate. This team shouldn't finish at 8-4. If they win out we're earning a bye and second round home game. If they win three of our final four they're in the playoffs with a first round home game. Losing two of these final four may get them in but it is far from certain.
:ugeek:

Great summation

Thank you. I am here to help. It is just what I do. ;)
 
'68griz said:
havgrizfan said:
As we speak, TSN has the Griz playing Bryant in the first round with the winner going to EWU. I doubt very much TSN is basing that on the Griz winning out either. Interstingly, they also have the Cats hosting in the first round with the winner going to NDSU. I'm sure they're basing it on thinking the Cats last loss will come at EWU and that will drop them. We shall see.

Do any of you geniuses realize the Griz have made the playoffs NUMEROUS TIMES, when they went 8-3 and 8-4 even. Or 9-3 in other 12 game seasons? And twice they were 8-3 with a share of the Big Sky, but did not receive the auto bid, and STILL PLAYED AT HOME in the first round and that was when it was a 16-team playoff!!! Or are all the people saying the Griz might not make it only fans from 2011 on?

Those whole "sadly" stuff is pretty transparent. Some of you think if the Griz don't make it Mick will be gone. NEITHER IS GONNA HAPPEN. Mick won't be gone even if the Griz stumble, and if the Griz beat Sacto and USD they are A LOCK AND could lose to Weebs and the Cats and STILL BE IN. PERIOD. Sorry to tell ya, but those of you hoping for the worst better really start crossing your fingers and doing what you need to do to jinx the Griz.

The Sactown game will tell the tale. I only worry about that game because they Griz always struggle there. Most of their wins there have been hideous. I don't care of they win by one this week, if they get out of Sactown with a W, it's smooth sailing baby.
Who the he!! is Bryant??

Nice! Almost 7700 posts and you finally made me laugh out loud!
 
stubbins said:
'68griz said:
havgrizfan said:
As we speak, TSN has the Griz playing Bryant in the first round with the winner going to EWU. I doubt very much TSN is basing that on the Griz winning out either. Interstingly, they also have the Cats hosting in the first round with the winner going to NDSU. I'm sure they're basing it on thinking the Cats last loss will come at EWU and that will drop them. We shall see.

Do any of you geniuses realize the Griz have made the playoffs NUMEROUS TIMES, when they went 8-3 and 8-4 even. Or 9-3 in other 12 game seasons? And twice they were 8-3 with a share of the Big Sky, but did not receive the auto bid, and STILL PLAYED AT HOME in the first round and that was when it was a 16-team playoff!!! Or are all the people saying the Griz might not make it only fans from 2011 on?

Those whole "sadly" stuff is pretty transparent. Some of you think if the Griz don't make it Mick will be gone. NEITHER IS GONNA HAPPEN. Mick won't be gone even if the Griz stumble, and if the Griz beat Sacto and USD they are A LOCK AND could lose to Weebs and the Cats and STILL BE IN. PERIOD. Sorry to tell ya, but those of you hoping for the worst better really start crossing your fingers and doing what you need to do to jinx the Griz.

The Sactown game will tell the tale. I only worry about that game because they Griz always struggle there. Most of their wins there have been hideous. I don't care of they win by one this week, if they get out of Sactown with a W, it's smooth sailing baby.
Who the he!! is Bryant??

Nice! Almost 7700 posts and you finally made me laugh out loud!

Bryant... as in...

kobe_bryant_con_competencia.jpg
 
'68griz said:
havgrizfan said:
As we speak, TSN has the Griz playing Bryant in the first round with the winner going to EWU. I doubt very much TSN is basing that on the Griz winning out either. Interstingly, they also have the Cats hosting in the first round with the winner going to NDSU. I'm sure they're basing it on thinking the Cats last loss will come at EWU and that will drop them. We shall see.

Do any of you geniuses realize the Griz have made the playoffs NUMEROUS TIMES, when they went 8-3 and 8-4 even. Or 9-3 in other 12 game seasons? And twice they were 8-3 with a share of the Big Sky, but did not receive the auto bid, and STILL PLAYED AT HOME in the first round and that was when it was a 16-team playoff!!! Or are all the people saying the Griz might not make it only fans from 2011 on?

Those whole "sadly" stuff is pretty transparent. Some of you think if the Griz don't make it Mick will be gone. NEITHER IS GONNA HAPPEN. Mick won't be gone even if the Griz stumble, and if the Griz beat Sacto and USD they are A LOCK AND could lose to Weebs and the Cats and STILL BE IN. PERIOD. Sorry to tell ya, but those of you hoping for the worst better really start crossing your fingers and doing what you need to do to jinx the Griz.

The Sactown game will tell the tale. I only worry about that game because they Griz always struggle there. Most of their wins there have been hideous. I don't care of they win by one this week, if they get out of Sactown with a W, it's smooth sailing baby.
Who the he!! is Bryant??

:lol: is that Dallas Cowboys crybaby Bryant they're predicting us to play? :lol:

3a8u5aty.jpg
 
The Big Sky will get 3 teams for certain.

Because the Conference GPI is down (5th as of last week), that could shape the committee's opinion on whether they think the Big Sky deserves 4 teams.

EWU has proven they deserve a playoff spot. They have 2 gimmes on the schedule (ISU/PSU) and you would expect them to beat Cal Poly too. Worst case, they are 8-4 with a win over a Top 25 FBS team.

Then it gets murky for UM, MSU, and NAU.

Scenarios:
All three win out, UM over MSU: I think all 3 get in. NAU has a win over UM, UM has a win over MSU, and MSU has a win over EWU. All three will be top 15 GPI.

All three win out, MSU over UM: MSU and NAU would get the nods with wins over UM. UM would be in if the committee thinks the Big Sky was strong enough to earn 4 playoff bids (they'd still have a top 20 GPI). They could very well say that UM didn't beat anyone noteworthy and leave them out at 9-3, also citing a weak Big Sky GPI. This would cause a huge backlash from Griz Nation that I'm sure the committee doesn't really want to deal with. Griz probably in.

If UM/MSU/NAU have a bad loss: UM could still get a win against MSU salvaging a playoff spot. MSU could still get a win against EWU salvaging a playoff spot. NAU would likely be out as their GPI would suffer.


NAU: Pretty simple for them. Win out and playoff-bound. Lose one and probably out.

UM: 9-3 with win over MSU gets them in. 9-3 with loss to MSU may not be enough (but probably in). 8-4 with loss to MSU will probably leave them out, as their GPI would tank. 8-4 with win over MSU probably still gets them in.

MSU: 9-3 would get them in (would have a win over EWU or UM). 8-4 with win over EWU probably is enough for them. 8-4 with loss to EWU and they are out.

DARK HORSE: Southern Utah! If SUU wins out, they would have wins over MSU and NAU - taking NAU's playoff spot, and potentially knocking MSU out of the playoffs too.

Cal Poly and Sacramento State are long shots. They play each other, so one will be eliminated next weekend. Sac St has UM and CP has EWU. Hard to see either one winning out (which is what they would need to even get playoff consideration).
 
Montana Gym Rat said:
The Big Sky will get 3 teams for certain.

Because the Conference GPI is down (5th as of last week), that could shape the committee's opinion on whether they think the Big Sky deserves 4 teams.

EWU has proven they deserve a playoff spot. They have 2 gimmes on the schedule (ISU/PSU) and you would expect them to beat Cal Poly too. Worst case, they are 8-4 with a win over a Top 25 FBS team.

Then it gets murky for UM, MSU, and NAU.

Scenarios:
All three win out, UM over MSU: I think all 3 get in. NAU has a win over UM, UM has a win over MSU, and MSU has a win over EWU. All three will be top 15 GPI.

All three win out, MSU over UM: MSU and NAU would get the nods with wins over UM. UM would be in if the committee thinks the Big Sky was strong enough to earn 4 playoff bids (they'd still have a top 20 GPI). They could very well say that UM didn't beat anyone noteworthy and leave them out at 9-3, also citing a weak Big Sky GPI. This would cause a huge backlash from Griz Nation that I'm sure the committee doesn't really want to deal with. Griz probably in.

If UM/MSU/NAU have a bad loss: UM could still get a win against MSU salvaging a playoff spot. MSU could still get a win against EWU salvaging a playoff spot. NAU would likely be out as their GPI would suffer.


NAU: Pretty simple for them. Win out and playoff-bound. Lose one and probably out.

UM: 9-3 with win over MSU gets them in. 9-3 with loss to MSU may not be enough (but probably in). 8-4 with loss to MSU will probably leave them out, as their GPI would tank. 8-4 with win over MSU probably still gets them in.

MSU: 9-3 would get them in (would have a win over EWU or UM). 8-4 with win over EWU probably is enough for them. 8-4 with loss to EWU and they are out.

DARK HORSE: Southern Utah! If SUU wins out, they would have wins over MSU and NAU - taking NAU's playoff spot, and potentially knocking MSU out of the playoffs too.

Cal Poly and Sacramento State are long shots. They play each other, so one will be eliminated next weekend. Sac St has UM and CP has EWU. Hard to see either one winning out (which is what they would need to even get playoff consideration).

Very good assessment.
Though I still think getting in at 8-4 (even with a win over MSU) is a crap shoot. :ugeek:
 
Eriul said:
jodcon said:
Eriul said:
All I have to say is 20 teams... I think that has been lost on most of you
You mean 24.
Right...lol 8-4 gets us in. Math hard

OK here is a math problem. Yes, there will be a test later;
Take 24 teams and subtract 11 for the auto bid conference winners.
Take remaining 13, subtract one for currently undefeated Fordham (9-0).
Of remaining 12, subtract another for either Maine or Towson (whichever isn't auto).
Of remaining 11, subtract another for either McNeese or Sam Houston (whichever isn't...).
Of remaining 10, subtract another (or two) for EWU, NAU, or MSU (whichever isn't auto).
Continue removing the other likely suspects and suddenly those 24 slots are starting to look much less plentiful.

So unless multiple teams begin to implode an 8-4 Montana (which would have to lose 3 of its final 5 games) is looking less likely to get an invite to the playoffs. That said, I believe our Grizzlies finish strong and we don't have to find out if 8-4 was good enough. :ugeek:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top