PTGrizzly said:
So they have to be committed to the team, and the coaches, but if they aren’t good enough (aka if the coach was wrong about offering them a scholarship), the coach doesn’t need to be committed to the player?
Interesting.
Hauck was committed to Toure. Toure didn’t lose his scholarship. Your post makes no sense.
I take it that you don’t care much about playing for your team and teammates and trying to win a national championship, in from of your friends and supporters. Playing for oneself is more important to or okay with you?
In my experience, not being a team player and not being a good team member isn’t a recipe for success in work or life.
Old school views for me. Toure can do what he wants and I hope he is successful in doing what he wants. It’s his choice and his life.
But in work and in life, I wouldn’t hire or be friends with someone who was mostly out for himself.