mthoopsfan
Well-known member
AZGrizFan said:Griziron said:I think NDSU also started offering full cost of attendance scholarships a few years ago. UM does not provide full cost of attendance.
North Dakota also produces fewer D1 football players on average than Montana, at least in part due to a smaller population. I recall that was one of the reasons that the Montana-North Dakota all-star game, which Montana dominated, was cancelled.
Well sure. When the two Montana schools have a combined 100+ Montana kids on their rosters (whether they belong there or not), then it will ALWAYS appear that Montana produces more D1 players. It’s due largely to the Montana schools’ misguided belief that more Montana players is better.
We looked slow and unathletic on Saturday. There’s really only one way to fix that, and it’s not by recruiting more kids from Montana that should be playing Frontier ball (even if they DO come on as walkons).
UM has more speed than NDSU, by the way. UM likes MT kids because they set good examples and lead the team in work ethic, meaning lead as leaders. Also, UM, and MSU, can't afford to pay for out-of-state tuition of lots of out of state scholarship players.