By the way humility is a two way street. I could have expected jackarse fans from UNC to parade in here and behave like they have never been there before. I expect it. I see it all the time. Doesn't reflect poorly on anyone, but if there is enough stink there must be something rotten in Denmark.
First and foremost I don't expect UNC fans to come in here and admit their win was aided by some questionable fouls and calls in the second half. Who wants to admit that in the first place.
I guess being a former official myself, there are three truths to officiating basketball games at any level.
1. There is no such thing as a perfectly officiated basketball game. Officiating is a human endeavor, conducted by well trained individuals. If players make mistakes, so will officials. All an official can do is be in the best possible place at all times to make the calls the way you see them.
2. Emotion should never be apart of officiating a basketball game, much like a pitcher, an official should never show anger, frustration and unsettledness on the floor.
3. Every effort must be given to ensure that games are called the same way in the first minute through the last minute of the game.
I watched a bit of the second half again last night, I can't attest that #3 was true. But I could see at certain points in the second half that a couple of the officials were clearly flustered by the environment. That isn't uncommon, but as a former official (who albeit wasn't very good) I can say that it is pretty easy to become emotionally connected to the environment. These are for the most part professional and highly skilled officials, and in part I am not going to throw them under the bus. I don't think it was personal, but at a few points in the second half it 'seemed' the environment got to them. Not an evaluator of any type, just an observation.
I guess from a griz fan's perspective there was a lot of that second half that would suggest #3, and that is what is frustrating. What everett griz hit on, there might be a few calls that aren't that don't go our way or UNC's way, but if there is a perception from impartial observers that #3 existed, then as an official evaluating your game you have a problem. You won't get a #3 admission from an official, but deep down most of them know if that occurred.
So thusly UNC enjoy your trip to the dance, savor it because they don't come along very often. But don't come in here after your announcers remarks last year and say we are delusional or biased or whatever because it is a two way street. Enjoy the trip.
First and foremost I don't expect UNC fans to come in here and admit their win was aided by some questionable fouls and calls in the second half. Who wants to admit that in the first place.
I guess being a former official myself, there are three truths to officiating basketball games at any level.
1. There is no such thing as a perfectly officiated basketball game. Officiating is a human endeavor, conducted by well trained individuals. If players make mistakes, so will officials. All an official can do is be in the best possible place at all times to make the calls the way you see them.
2. Emotion should never be apart of officiating a basketball game, much like a pitcher, an official should never show anger, frustration and unsettledness on the floor.
3. Every effort must be given to ensure that games are called the same way in the first minute through the last minute of the game.
I watched a bit of the second half again last night, I can't attest that #3 was true. But I could see at certain points in the second half that a couple of the officials were clearly flustered by the environment. That isn't uncommon, but as a former official (who albeit wasn't very good) I can say that it is pretty easy to become emotionally connected to the environment. These are for the most part professional and highly skilled officials, and in part I am not going to throw them under the bus. I don't think it was personal, but at a few points in the second half it 'seemed' the environment got to them. Not an evaluator of any type, just an observation.
I guess from a griz fan's perspective there was a lot of that second half that would suggest #3, and that is what is frustrating. What everett griz hit on, there might be a few calls that aren't that don't go our way or UNC's way, but if there is a perception from impartial observers that #3 existed, then as an official evaluating your game you have a problem. You won't get a #3 admission from an official, but deep down most of them know if that occurred.
So thusly UNC enjoy your trip to the dance, savor it because they don't come along very often. But don't come in here after your announcers remarks last year and say we are delusional or biased or whatever because it is a two way street. Enjoy the trip.