UMGriz75 said:I don't either, but I am trying to get opinions from those who say they do or think they do know.Ursa Major said:I have no idea if any of the reports of the defensive strategy being taken away from TG are true or not. I would think that you would have to control for the quality of the offenses the Griz faced in the final 5 games. Other than ISU, they faced two very proficient offenses in msu and ewu; and two playoff teams. One would think they are going to be statistically better teams than the other group of teams the Griz played.
If Stitt took over the defense at some point, the overall recent average of points is statistically significantly higher as scored by opponents.
If TG was still in charge, it is impressive that the "two very proficient offenses," EWU and MSU were held to 16 points for EWU, and for MSU to 14 points in the first half, just another 8 points in the third quarter, and then 13 points after Montana began substituting in the 4th Q, as well as SDSU at 17 points.
Stitt claimed unhappiness with the defense immediately after the Cal Poly game despite the defense holding Cal Poly to just 20. At the time is struck me as an odd criticism, considering it was the offense that had failed so miserably, in a home game, against a genius offense with his first string QB in place. I can recall only three other home games at Wash-Griz where the Griz scored less than 24 points, against genuinely good teams in those years, which Cal Poly was definitely "not."
"If" Stitt exerted more control of defense after mid-season, then PSU (35) and ISU (27) add to a relatively unfavorable second half season defensive effort precisely because of less proficient offenses achieving above-average results, even compared to late season and post-season opponents.
It was such a variable season, unrelated in many ways to who was QB, it's almost puzzling; and that extends to whether or not Ty was or was not the main DC in the second half of the season.
Stitt never took over the defense....