mthoopsfan
Well-known member
Losing 1/3 of your games, and losing to top teams, shows that you are not as bad as 8-4 looks, but you were are not a great team and not close to being a really good team.
AZGrizFan said:CDAGRIZ said:What’s the handle? I need to see it.
@realungersales…..his handle is “My Name is Jeff”.
Bisonation said:We got MSU fans on our side for this one….
AZGrizFan said:UncleRico said:He was the guy that came on here and on the Furman board as FUDude. He really went bonkers a month or so ago on Twiiter. Like really crazy,
I don’t think so…maybe. He DOES post with his real last name, and I’ve never heard of him…but man, he’s an angry human. :lol: :lol:
mthoopsfan said:Losing 1/3 of your games, and losing to top teams, shows that you are not as bad as 8-4 looks, but you were are not a great team and not close to being a really good team.
Yes and my neighbor took it a step farther.EverettGriz said:I've also had bubs fans saying all weekend the bsc was overrated. Uhh, four playoff teams (should have been five), three seeds, 2 in the quarters, one in the semis.
Nahhhh, I think the bsc was fine. Now, the BUBS were likely overrated. But don't blame that on the conference
AZGrizFan said:mthoopsfan said:Losing 1/3 of your games, and losing to top teams, shows that you are not as bad as 8-4 looks, but you were are not a great team and not close to being a really good team.
We weren’t arguing whether they were a “good” team. He claimed that because the 4 teams they lost to were all in (or in Idaho’s case, playing for a spot in) the semifinals, that the ‘Scats were somehow “just as good” as those four teams.
How does that logic even compute?
Ihatelife said:AZGrizFan said:We weren’t arguing whether they were a “good” team. He claimed that because the 4 teams they lost to were all in (or in Idaho’s case, playing for a spot in) the semifinals, that the ‘Scats were somehow “just as good” as those four teams.
How does that logic even compute?
It doesn’t. What does compute is you were arguing with such a genius.
AZGrizFan said:Ihatelife said:It doesn’t. What does compute is you were arguing with such a genius.
Well, let me clear that up. I was stating facts. HE was arguing. And obsessing about my “identity” because I dare to post anonymously on twitter. :lol:
AZGrizFan said:Ihatelife said:It doesn’t. What does compute is you were arguing with such a genius.
Well, let me clear that up. I was stating facts. HE was arguing. And obsessing about my “identity” because I dare to post anonymously on twitter. :lol:
Well, this time of year can be hard on many people for various reasons. I bet his stomach hurts.AZGrizFan said:UncleRico said:He was the guy that came on here and on the Furman board as FUDude. He really went bonkers a month or so ago on Twiiter. Like really crazy,
I don’t think so…maybe. He DOES post with his real last name, and I’ve never heard of him…but man, he’s an angry human. :lol: :lol:
Alaska Griz said:Alaska Griz said:3 of the 4. Albany didn't get the chance to beat them.
Regardless, they should make t-shirts with this statistic so folks outside of their fanbase realize how good they really were.
AZGrizFan said:We weren’t arguing whether they were a “good” team. He claimed that because the 4 teams they lost to were all in (or in Idaho’s case, playing for a spot in) the semifinals, that the ‘Scats were somehow “just as good” as those four teams.
How does that logic even compute?
Stop_HammerTime69 said:Alaska Griz said:Regardless, they should make t-shirts with this statistic so folks outside of their fanbase realize how good they really were.
They should make a documentary about it. Call it "Close still counts"
Bisonation said:We got MSU fans on our side for this one….
Fahque said:https://twitter.com/realungersales/status/1733613541440270562
Fahque said:https://twitter.com/realungersales/status/1733613541440270562