bigsky33 said:EverettGriz said:So should msu's leadership be asked why that did not occur? Is it out of line for them no to address that question? Do you still have faith in them to make good decisions and do what needs to be done? Do you believe if the coaches plea to a lesser charge that no action will be taken and the WAAC program happily rolls along?
The leadership already has stated that they do not comment on employee personnel matters. I take it that is why the media is not asking. I am sure the leadership feels they are handling this the right way based on the information and facts that they have. Time will tell. I don't think we can determine if they made good decisions or not until due process is completed and what actions are taken and we hear their explanation as to why they did what they did especially not suspending them until trial. I do believe that will all come out. I don't believe that they are doing anything nefarious. I know these people pretty well and I find them to be good honest people. That is my opinion. I don't know how you can determine what they should do if they plead to a lesser charge until you see the facts around it. I should still think there would be some penalty. If found innocent then life goes on. If found guilty, in my opinion they should be fired. You may not like or agree with my answers but that is my opinion.
I know what they've said. I'm asking if you feel that is appropriate. And I'm asking you if you feel they should have been suspended?
But it sounds to me as if you're saying the WAAC program is just praying for a not-guilty verdict (or, more likely, a lesser plea) so everything can be all hunky dory again (I mean, one of them DID serve a one-game suspension so....) and we can all get back to full WAAC. But do let me know if I've misconstrued.