Something to consider - it is not illegal to drink alcohol and drive a car. I know it seems like it is, but it isn't. It is illegal to operate a vehicle while impaired (alcohol or drugs). The state decided that .08 bac is intoxicated. The state can also contend that the driver was intoxicated by other evidence, such as erratic driving. However simply smelling alcohol by itself is not proof the driver was impaired, nor is speeding. The field sobriety tests can be used as evidence, but alone are not proof either. In other words, even if Mr. Montana was drinking and then drove, it doesn't necessarily mean he was intoxicated enough to be legally impaired. Therefore the DA will look at the evidence the police gathered, decided if there is enough evidence to prosecute, and if so a judge or jury will decide, or Mr. Montana and the DA will come to an agreement about what is provable and fair in this case. That is why we have a justice system, and why the U will hold back and let the justice system run its course. It doesn't mean Mr. Montana will not face some punishment from the team regardless of the final outcome of the case.jcu27 said:The only problem I have about this whole thing is that this guy sells some brownies and everyone freaks out and thinks he shouldn't play anymore, with Nate Montana people didn't even really seem to care that much. I haven't seen or heard anyone saying Nate shouldn't be able to play or anything....It's really quite ridiculous and hypocritical.
WILD_CAT said:jcu27 said:The only problem I have about this whole thing is that this guy sells some brownies and everyone freaks out and thinks he shouldn't play anymore, with Nate Montana people didn't even really seem to care that much. I haven't seen or heard anyone saying Nate shouldn't be able to play or anything....It's really quite ridiculous and hypocritical.
Exactly. Pretty much night and day discipline between FLU and ASH. Thomas booted from Cats w/o even waiting for his day in court. That will carry over to each others team. There was a reason the Griz teams were so sloppy and undisciplined last year.
WILD_CAT said:Exactly. Pretty much night and day discipline between FLU and ASH. Thomas booted from Cats w/o even waiting for his day in court. That will carry over to each others team. There was a reason the Griz teams were so sloppy and undisciplined last year.
reed rothchild said:WILD_CAT said:Exactly. Pretty much night and day discipline between FLU and ASH. Thomas booted from Cats w/o even waiting for his day in court. That will carry over to each others team. There was a reason the Griz teams were so sloppy and undisciplined last year.
Easy there, Glasshouse. It's pretty hard to see any D1 football coach keeping an admitted drug dealer on the team, particularly one who blew his second chance after nine months.
Coach Phlugrad has not yet had a player or recruit accused of a felony, so it's difficult to compare his disciplinary philosophy to Ash. What we do know from the Ash tenure is this: if you get drunk and break into a stranger's home, you are welcome to play bobcat football.
jcu27 said:The only problem I have about this whole thing is that this guy sells some brownies and everyone freaks out and thinks he shouldn't play anymore, with Nate Montana people didn't even really seem to care that much. I haven't seen or heard anyone saying Nate shouldn't be able to play or anything....It's really quite ridiculous and hypocritical.
grizrgood said:jcu27 said:The only problem I have about this whole thing is that this guy sells some brownies and everyone freaks out and thinks he shouldn't play anymore, with Nate Montana people didn't even really seem to care that much. I haven't seen or heard anyone saying Nate shouldn't be able to play or anything....It's really quite ridiculous and hypocritical.
I understand what you are saying but come on man, the biggest problem is that this kid signed a code of conduct when he committed to play college football which among other things, clearly states that that you can't use illegal drugs. Like it or not at least 70% (not sure of the percentage, just a guess)of the population doesn't smoke or approve of weed! He may have pissed away at least a descent financial future because he couldn't obey the laws of the land and behave long enough to get through school and get his degree!
Alcohol is legal but the other kid made an extremely poor decision as well! He chose to drive his vehicle after drinking too much and got caught, he clearly screwed up!! Not sure about you but I've made the same mistake a time or two in my life and I believe most most of us have. Was it wrong and dangerous?..... Absolutely!! Does it mean we were purposely trying to break the law and endanger someones life? ......Probably not! The other kid got caught selling an illegal drug for profit, he's a drug dealer! You may think weed should be legal but it's just NOT!
hlnagriz said:grizrgood said:jcu27 said:The only problem I have about this whole thing is that this guy sells some brownies and everyone freaks out and thinks he shouldn't play anymore, with Nate Montana people didn't even really seem to care that much. I haven't seen or heard anyone saying Nate shouldn't be able to play or anything....It's really quite ridiculous and hypocritical.
I understand what you are saying but come on man, the biggest problem is that this kid signed a code of conduct when he committed to play college football which among other things, clearly states that that you can't use illegal drugs. Like it or not at least 70% (not sure of the percentage, just a guess)of the population doesn't smoke or approve of weed! He may have pissed away at least a descent financial future because he couldn't obey the laws of the land and behave long enough to get through school and get his degree!
Alcohol is legal but the other kid made an extremely poor decision as well! He chose to drive his vehicle after drinking too much and got caught, he clearly screwed up!! Not sure about you but I've made the same mistake a time or two in my life and I believe most most of us have. Was it wrong and dangerous?..... Absolutely!! Does it mean we were purposely trying to break the law and endanger someones life? ......Probably not! The other kid got caught selling an illegal drug for profit, he's a drug dealer! You may think weed should be legal but it's just NOT!
Drunk driving is just as illegal, if not more illegal than selling a little pot. I am a Griz fan, but selling pot brownies doesn't put other peoples lives at risk like drunk driving does. Drunk driving, even though as Montanan's we have perhaps done before, is incredibly irresponsible and dangerous. Look at those teenage girls that got killed between Missoula and East Missoula, they were what, 15? I am sorry, but selling some pot compared to actively participating in an activity that can harm so many is not even comparable.
hlnagriz said:It doesn't matter if the player was drinking, or selling pot laced brownies, especially if you believe in the harm factor (Drunk driving is way, way, way, more dangerous than eating or selling pot brownies.). Both should be punished accordingly, but I think in think in this case it has more to do with the Thomas history.
reed rothchild said:WILD_CAT said:Exactly. Pretty much night and day discipline between FLU and ASH. Thomas booted from Cats w/o even waiting for his day in court. That will carry over to each others team. There was a reason the Griz teams were so sloppy and undisciplined last year.
Easy there, Glasshouse. It's pretty hard to see any D1 football coach keeping an admitted drug dealer on the team, particularly one who blew his second chance after nine months.
Coach Phlugrad has not yet had a player or recruit accused of a felony, so it's difficult to compare his disciplinary philosophy to Ash. What we do know from the Ash tenure is this: if you get drunk and break into a stranger's home, you are welcome to play bobcat football.
PlayerRep said:hlnagriz said:grizrgood said:jcu27 said:The only problem I have about this whole thing is that this guy sells some brownies and everyone freaks out and thinks he shouldn't play anymore, with Nate Montana people didn't even really seem to care that much. I haven't seen or heard anyone saying Nate shouldn't be able to play or anything....It's really quite ridiculous and hypocritical.
I understand what you are saying but come on man, the biggest problem is that this kid signed a code of conduct when he committed to play college football which among other things, clearly states that that you can't use illegal drugs. Like it or not at least 70% (not sure of the percentage, just a guess)of the population doesn't smoke or approve of weed! He may have pissed away at least a descent financial future because he couldn't obey the laws of the land and behave long enough to get through school and get his degree!
Alcohol is legal but the other kid made an extremely poor decision as well! He chose to drive his vehicle after drinking too much and got caught, he clearly screwed up!! Not sure about you but I've made the same mistake a time or two in my life and I believe most most of us have. Was it wrong and dangerous?..... Absolutely!! Does it mean we were purposely trying to break the law and endanger someones life? ......Probably not! The other kid got caught selling an illegal drug for profit, he's a drug dealer! You may think weed should be legal but it's just NOT!
Drunk driving is just as illegal, if not more illegal than selling a little pot. I am a Griz fan, but selling pot brownies doesn't put other peoples lives at risk like drunk driving does. Drunk driving, even though as Montanan's we have perhaps done before, is incredibly irresponsible and dangerous. Look at those teenage girls that got killed between Missoula and East Missoula, they were what, 15? I am sorry, but selling some pot compared to actively participating in an activity that can harm so many is not even comparable.
Nope, under US laws, distributing drugs is (or can be charged as) a felony, and being stopped for suspicion of a DUI (and nothing else) is a misdemeanor. Conviction of or pleading to felonies results in prison sentences, with some of the sentence sometimes being suspended or served concurrently. Conviction or resolution of a DUI usually results in payment of a fine and some classes. Huge difference. It's really quite amusing to see some of you try to equate a felony with a a minor misdemeanor.
MooUBaby said:What are you dense in the head? Do yo not remember Jimmy Wilson or did you accidently forget about that. Pretty sure killing a guy and fleeing the state is a felony. Phlugrad has certainly dealt with the same things Ash has. So yeah you can compare his disciplinary philosophies or lack there of, it goes both ways bud.
hlnagriz said:Sale of Marijuana on "can" be charged as a felony, and rarely is. What he will be charged with is possession of under 60 grams (which is a misdemeanor) And if you really think that selling marijuana is more harmful and dangerous than drinking and driving, which had in 2007 alone 123 deaths, most of which were people that had nothing to do with drunk driving, they just got killed by a drunk driver. You are an idiot, this isn't a MSU vs. UM thing, drunk driving is deplorable, kills innocent people, and is easy to avoid. The only people selling pot would conceivably harm are people who entered into it willingly. Just because Nate Montana didn't hurt anyone doesn't mean the potential for incredible damage was there. Drunk driving is stupid and irresponsible, selling weed is just a bad idea.