• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Possible QB Transfer

Ursus1 said:
PlayerRep said:
AZGrizFan said:
PlayerRep said:
the Bison D was so good and dominant, that UM couldn't handle it. Saying that UM would have had a better run game if Bready had run, is almost silly, in my view. The key factor was the dominant Bison defense, not whether Brady ran or could run.

I guess the question is: was the Bison defense dominant because Brady didn't/wouldn't run, or did Brady not run because of the dominant Bison defense?

Nope. The Bison D was just plain dominant and it had nothing to do with Brady running or not in my view. Brady hadn't run hardly at all during the season, and he was still coming back from the leg injury, so no surprise he didn't run.

If anyone else things that the Bison D was dominant because Brady didn't run, please speak up. I'm curious as to whether there are a number of you who believe that.


Still waiting for you to answers my question. ..why were they dominant the second time around? I realize this answer might force you to be critical of some coaches or players, maybe you can't sugar coat everything



Player.....still no response?
 
GrizMaker said:
The need for 300 lb Dline guys, Tight Ends, increased overall speed and Zone read QB's have led to some minor changes in the previous system. Rumors are that we have 2-300lb guys to act as run stoppers on the way, DT standout is moving to DE, the Tight End is being reinstated and Zone Read QB's are coming as well as competition for the drop back QB position too. apparently exit interviews had some people a little shocked. If anyone can verify any of this it will start the New Year off in a positive manner. Happy New Year to Griz Nation.

There is a lot of "stuff" in this post. Besides the return of the tight end position, has ANY of the other info here been validated or confirmed?
 
Ursus1 said:
Ursus1 said:
PlayerRep said:
AZGrizFan said:
I guess the question is: was the Bison defense dominant because Brady didn't/wouldn't run, or did Brady not run because of the dominant Bison defense?

Nope. The Bison D was just plain dominant and it had nothing to do with Brady running or not in my view. Brady hadn't run hardly at all during the season, and he was still coming back from the leg injury, so no surprise he didn't run.

If anyone else things that the Bison D was dominant because Brady didn't run, please speak up. I'm curious as to whether there are a number of you who believe that.


Still waiting for you to answers my question. ..why were they dominant the second time around? I realize this answer might force you to be critical of some coaches or players, maybe you can't sugar coat everything



Player.....still no response?

Don't know. Haven't talked to any coaches, like I often do. But here's my guess. NDSU had seen the year's tapes, as opposed to no tape the first time. NDSU made multiple adjustments, had a great scheme, and was much better prepared. NDSU had huge motivation and had a chip on its shoulder. Their star corner, no. 5, was back. Their d-line and 1 linebacker scheme was very effective, and UM didn't or couldn't adjust to it. Stitt said they surprised UM with various things. Their d-line completely handled our o-line, totally shut down our rush game, and put huge pressure on Brady. Their secondary pretty much shut down our receivers, except in the 3d quarter. UM's offense has been inconsistent all season, and was never great (except at times in several games). NDSU was very motivated. NDSU was playing at home. NDSU is playing very well late in the season. They appear to be unbeatable.
 
GrizMusician said:
Has Reese Phillips visited campus yet?


Reese Phillips ‏@ReesePhillips11 5m5 minutes ago
I can't wait to visit Montana on Tuesday!! Blessed to have the opportunity #Burr
 
Back
Top