Ursus1 said:PlayerRep said:AZGrizFan said:PlayerRep said:the Bison D was so good and dominant, that UM couldn't handle it. Saying that UM would have had a better run game if Bready had run, is almost silly, in my view. The key factor was the dominant Bison defense, not whether Brady ran or could run.
I guess the question is: was the Bison defense dominant because Brady didn't/wouldn't run, or did Brady not run because of the dominant Bison defense?
Nope. The Bison D was just plain dominant and it had nothing to do with Brady running or not in my view. Brady hadn't run hardly at all during the season, and he was still coming back from the leg injury, so no surprise he didn't run.
If anyone else things that the Bison D was dominant because Brady didn't run, please speak up. I'm curious as to whether there are a number of you who believe that.
Still waiting for you to answers my question. ..why were they dominant the second time around? I realize this answer might force you to be critical of some coaches or players, maybe you can't sugar coat everything
Player.....still no response?