• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

Players That Will NOT Return Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
 
BWahlberg said:
grzz said:
The biggest rumble I heard has now been officially retracted, so I am more at peace with things than previously. Hahaha

:thumb: :thumb: some fans overheard an upset parent and turned that into reasoning their kid wasn't returning. Sounds like it's been smoothed out.

Yeah, his Tweet would indicate he was laughing his ass of at the "rumor"
 
OU812! said:
Not being critical of you personally...just asking the question...Hey 75 what changed your tune? A few weeks ago you were on me pretty good for making some of the statements you are now repeating? If what I heard this weekend is true about how he & Haslem handled Henderson's tragic episode...they should both be out of work immediately. UM completely failed that young man & his family.
I think you may have me confused with a different poster.
 
UMGriz75 said:
OU812! said:
Not being critical of you personally...just asking the question...Hey 75 what changed your tune? A few weeks ago you were on me pretty good for making some of the statements you are now repeating? If what I heard this weekend is true about how he & Haslem handled Henderson's tragic episode...they should both be out of work immediately. UM completely failed that young man & his family.
I think you may have me confused with a different poster.

My Apologies Good Sir
 
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.
 
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.


Lots of denial by many....but maybe someday they will listen, but awfully hard to with heads in the sand.
 
Allezchat said:
How was Henderson handled?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Very poorly...If half of what I was told is true! His illness and medical issues were never taken seriously by the University.

What I heard really disturbed me because he gave his heart to this program, community and fans. When the time came for them to give the compassion he needed in return from UM Athletic Department, they completely failed to do so.

I was also told that Stitt never reached out to the family in any capacity and that Kent essentially told his father that he needed to allow his son to grow up because "he was an adult now...he doesn't need you to be as involved!"

I know he wasn't a "montana kid" but if true, this is completely unacceptable in my mind.
 
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.

So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions.

I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.
 
HookedonGriz said:
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.

So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions.

I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.

I can add a story I heard of two kids red shirting both talking about being excited to help contribute next year. One even silenced a fan at the game who was complaining about Stitt (nothing intimidating - just reinforced his trust in Stitt to the bitching fan).
 
BWahlberg said:
HookedonGriz said:
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.

So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions.

I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.

I can add a story I heard of two kids red shirting both talking about being excited to help contribute next year. One even silenced a fan at the game who was complaining about Stitt (nothing intimidating - just reinforced his trust in Stitt to the bitching fan).

Whatever Brint. Sounds like message board fan stuff to me.

Signed ~ Message Board Fan
 
Guess some may come down to who they trust to actually tell how they really feel. Wouldn't expect a player to outwardly criticize a coach, but what is said in a safe environment is an entire different thing. We can just agree to disagree on the Stitt love factor. I don't think kids will start a coup, but that doesn't mean they will run through walls either. Maybe (hopefully) Stitt will see the issue and take steps to bring the team together.
 
signedbewildered said:
BWahlberg said:
HookedonGriz said:
UMGriz75 said:
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.

So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions.

I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.

I can add a story I heard of two kids red shirting both talking about being excited to help contribute next year. One even silenced a fan at the game who was complaining about Stitt (nothing intimidating - just reinforced his trust in Stitt to the bitching fan).

Whatever Brint. Sounds like message board fan stuff to me.

Signed ~ Message Board Fan

Yeah? Well where did you log into this message board? The jerk store?

Signed ~ twitter and message board antagonist
 
OU812! said:
Allezchat said:
How was Henderson handled?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Very poorly...If half of what I was told is true! His illness and medical issues were never taken seriously by the University.

What I heard really disturbed me because he gave his heart to this program, community and fans. When the time came for them to give the compassion he needed in return from UM Athletic Department, they completely failed to do so.

I was also told that Stitt never reached out to the family in any capacity and that Kent essentially told his father that he needed to allow his son to grow up because "he was an adult now...he doesn't need you to be as involved!"

I know he wasn't a "montana kid" but if true, this is completely unacceptable in my mind.
The program supported him through the year he had to withdraw. They welcomed him back. Kent was the AD through all of that. The school helped him get his waiver to gain a six year of eligibility. I find what you are implying hard to believe.

Do you think Stitt wouldn't have wanted a Senior Ellis Henderson with all these freshman? The NCAA has rules and the waiver likely came with conditions. There are only so many things either Haslam or Stitt could even have done in those situations. For example, if you don't go to class, you may fail, and you may lose your eligibility. If that is due to medical issues, Haslam and Stitt couldn't make that call even if they wanted to.

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
 
HookedonGriz said:
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.
So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions. I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.
"Nothing but good to say?"

Are you out of your GD mind? Are they? Did you see what happened Saturday? You have no credibility if you think anyone can look at three team players that saw what has happened the last four games, including that one, and "have nothing but good to say." That's beyond delusional.

Experienced observers, players, coaches, etc. can see tangible evidence when a coach "loses" a team. If you review the comments over the past four games, in particular the comments from Stitt himself ("no fire," "been that way for a while"), but from any knowledgeable observer (and many have posted), the Griz have been "going through the motions."

The lack of intensity is exactly what happens when a team loses confidence in its coach. As one poster noted, Stitt hollering and screaming at players finally reached the ultimate destination: it didn't do any good. The kids are tired of it and don't care. There is no other way to explain how the UM Grizzlies can lose to a bunch of teenagers and a first year coach at WaGriz. The UM Football team stopped playing to win four games ago. Stop pretending.

Stitt took full responsibility. He described much of the criticism I have directed to him, and acknowledged it. You continuing to deny it simply looks idiotic. He and I agree, although he was pretty much in a corner of self-creation. What was his alternative? Odd that you continue to disagree with the coach you so admire. Kind of like Ferguson last December, right? Anybody that said that Stitt was not behind Gregorak 1000% was a Stitt-hater. Indeed, they might even have an agenda!! Gregorak was gone six days later.

Genius stuff.
 
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.
So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions. I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.
"Nothing but good to say?"

Are you out of your GD mind? Are they? Did you see what happened Saturday? You have no credibility if you think anyone can look at three team players that saw what has happened the last four games, including that one, and "have nothing but good to say." That's beyond delusional.

Experienced observers, players, coaches, etc. can see tangible evidence when a coach "loses" a team. If you review the comments over the past four games, in particular the comments from Stitt himself ("no fire," "been that way for a while"), but from any knowledgeable observer (and many have posted), the Griz have been "going through the motions."

The lack of intensity is exactly what happens when a team loses confidence in its coach. As one poster noted, Stitt hollering and screaming at players finally reached the ultimate destination: it didn't do any good. The kids are tired of it and don't care. There is no other way to explain how the UM Grizzlies can lose to a bunch of teenagers and a first year coach at WaGriz. The UM Football team stopped playing to win four games ago. Stop pretending.

Stitt took full responsibility. He described much of the criticism I have directed to him, and acknowledged it. You continuing to deny it simply looks idiotic. He and I agree, although he was pretty much in a corner of self-creation. What was his alternative? Odd that you continue to disagree with the coach you so admire. Kind of like Ferguson last December, right? Anybody that said that Stitt was not behind Gregorak 1000% was a Stitt-hater. Indeed, they might even have an agenda!! Gregorak was gone six days later.

Genius stuff.

So it seems the answer is no, 75 has not talked with all members of the team.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
So it seems the answer is no, 75 has not talked with all members of the team.
Not the three that thought everything was going great, obviously somehow I missed those. Good point though. Asking who they might be. And why they are excited about an historic Griz loss to a team of teenagers. Although, since Stitt now admits he agrees with what I have been saying, who do you think Stitt did not talk to? Did he miss the gleeful threesome that Hookedongriz talked to through third party communications? Do you think he would have changed his opinion of his performance? Seriously? Because "Hookedongriz" found three hearsay opinions from excited teenagers who really enjoyed watching the UM Griz get shellacked by "the worst team in the Big Sky Conference" in WaGriz, where the coach once sadly announced "we don't get beat in our house," leaving out the "worst team in the BSC exception."
 
UMGriz75 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
So it seems the answer is no, 75 has not talked with all members of the team.
Not the three that thought everything was going great, obviously somehow I missed those. Good point though. Asking who they might be. And why they are excited about an historic Griz loss to a team of teenagers. Although, since Stitt now admits he agrees with what I have been saying, who do you think Stitt did not talk to? Did he miss the gleeful threesome that Hookedongriz talked to through third party communications? Do you think he would have changed his opinion of his performance? Seriously? Because "Hookedongriz" found three hearsay opinions from excited teenagers who really enjoyed watching the UM Griz get shellacked by "the worst team in the Big Sky Conference" in WaGriz, where the coach once sadly announced "we don't get beat in our house," leaving out the "worst team in the BSC exception."

I must have missed when he stated that he talked to all the players and was told by all that they are not excited and can't stand to play for him.
 
HelenaHandBasket said:
I must have missed when he stated that he talked to all the players and was told by all that they are not excited and can't stand to play for him.
That's scary when you are suggesting that a coach was not watching the games. It's also interesting that you missed his press conference when he admitted, he really, really wanted to be liked. Apparently he got the "impression" from the team that he wasn't. Write him letter. Ask him what he thinks you missed that everyone, including him, could finally see.

Let us know what his response is.
 
UMGriz75 said:
HelenaHandBasket said:
I must have missed when he stated that he talked to all the players and was told by all that they are not excited and can't stand to play for him.
That's scary when you are suggesting that a coach was not watching the games. It's also interesting that you missed his press conference when he admitted, he really, really wanted to be liked. Apparently he got the "impression" from the team that he wasn't. Write him letter. Ask him what he thinks you missed that everyone, including him, could finally see.

Let us know what his response is.

How many players have you talked to, 75? It appears that you have passing off your assumptions of the team's views of the coach as fact. That, or you have talked first hand to the players and are relaying their beliefs to the public. It is scary that someone whose is not a member of the program, would be loudly and repeatedly voice their biased assumptions to the readership of the board (which includes potential recruits, parents, and valued boosters) on a team's collective views as fact based on observations made from just watching the games or the tweets of a few selected former players.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top