HookedonGriz said:
UMGriz75 said:
HookedonGriz said:
I'd be willing to bet that 8-10 don't like him and 8-10 think he's great and everyone else is in the middle and indifferent....and All will continue to work hard and leave their best on the field for the love of the game, to earn their schollie, and to earn respect for the name on the back of their jersey as well as the front. I played college sports and this describes my team to a T.
You're not describing the current UM Grizzly Football team.
So you either know 90 players on the team who feel negativity toward Stitt to say that, or you know 2 and are drawing some major conclusions. I'll bite. I know 3 kids (through various connections) who have nothing but good to say and are excited for the future. So I could technically apply the same rule and say the whole team loves him. That's why I said it's a mix of both.
"Nothing but good to say?"
Are you out of your GD mind? Are they? Did you see what happened Saturday? You have no credibility if you think anyone can look at three team players that saw what has happened the last four games, including that one, and "have nothing but good to say." That's beyond delusional.
Experienced observers, players, coaches, etc. can see tangible evidence when a coach "loses" a team. If you review the comments over the past four games, in particular the comments from Stitt himself ("no fire," "been that way for a while"), but from any knowledgeable observer (and many have posted), the Griz have been "going through the motions."
The lack of intensity is exactly what happens when a team loses confidence in its coach. As one poster noted, Stitt hollering and screaming at players finally reached the ultimate destination: it didn't do any good. The kids are tired of it and don't care. There is no other way to explain how the UM Grizzlies can lose to a bunch of teenagers and a first year coach at WaGriz. The UM Football team stopped playing to win four games ago. Stop pretending.
Stitt took full responsibility. He described much of the criticism I have directed to him, and acknowledged it. You continuing to deny it simply looks idiotic. He and I agree, although he was pretty much in a corner of self-creation. What was his alternative? Odd that you continue to disagree with the coach you so admire. Kind of like Ferguson last December, right? Anybody that said that Stitt was not behind Gregorak 1000% was a Stitt-hater. Indeed, they might even have an
agenda!! Gregorak was gone six days later.
Genius stuff.