PlayerRep said:EverettGriz said:Obviously moregooder is crocked to call Robin (see what I did there??! :thumb: ) the worst coach in UM's history.
That said, I will admit that I do not understand the interest by many on this board to suddenly consider him a veritable deity. Yes, he took a team to the semis. But his two year record wasn't particularly sparkling by UM standards. And like it or not, agree with it or not, he presided over a program that incurred NCAA violations. And while I agree that many players who played for him loved him, I know of more than a handful who did not. Now, I don't think that's at all unsual; players don't (and perhaps shouldn't) always get along with their head coach.
But all things considered, I just don't understand why his firing suddenly turned him into a guy whose bust should be placed in the Hall of Champions in the eyes of many on this board.
Pflu was the haed coach during the ncaa "violations". He did not "preside" over the program. He was not head of compliance. Jean Gee was the compliance director. Engstrom was the president. I hope you don't think that the head football coach should have been overseeing "boosters" whom he had never met, for in-home meals? Do you think the head coach should monitor how players pay for legal representation or get bailed out? If anyone should, isn't that the athletic department's job?
OFFS.
I can't believe I'm even wading into an argument this ridiculously stupid (but then what argument with you isn't?). But if you've never heard the term "presiding over a program" in reference to a head coach, then you truly have never played the game. Or watched it. Or spoken to anyone who has.
Yes, it was Pflu's program. It's Engstrom's university. It was O'Day's athletic department. It was Pflu's football program. Did he cause the violations? No. Did he know about them? Evidence would suggest yes. But none of that matters because at the time he presided over the program.