getgrizzy said:My main reason for backing Ash isn't because I like his idea, but it's to try to curtail all the posts about the cats that invade nearly every thread.KoolMoeDee said:“I want to get on my soap box for a minute since I have the stage and talk about the word commitment,” Ash said. “The recruiting process is brutal. It’s excruciating and very challenging for the recruits and the coaches alike. The decisions are very difficult and life-changing for both parties, but in the end, when scholarships are involved, once we get to Signing Day, we have to have a scholarship for each player we’ve promised one to. The only way we can do that is we have to make a commitment to them. We will have money for them on signing day. This can’t just be a one-way street. We can’t have a system in place where recruits can commit to schools in order to save themselves a scholarship an then continue to shop themselves around to other schools looking for a better offer. As coaches and educators of the youth of America, we need to teach these young men that a commitment is a commitment. They need to stick to their commitment if they make one or they need to be honest and declare that they are still open for recruitment. On our side of the deal, we need to honor commitments as coaches when they are made by recruits to other schools so that we can move on to other players and let them be committed. Without honor, our profession and our sport will become tarnished. We are passing on the wrong lessons to the men we are about to bring under our guidance. I intend to pursue this message in all my future professional gatherings, business meetings, national meetings, conventions and so forth. I am going to ask for the support of my coaching colleagues from around the country that we are sending the wrong message and that error needs to be corrected. That commitment is a commitment.”
I fully back Ash also, but for different reasons.