GrizRanger said:
Is there any point in debating who should head the Griz football program when such decisions are in the hand of a University president who could care less about football, and worse yet, likely does not want a dominant football program at UM.
I don't know Engstrom could care less, or if he just doesn't get it. Jim O'Day used to talk about this disconnect between the administration and the realities of the athletic department. There was this presumption that somehow athletics could always churn up more ticket revenue, always shake the booster money tree to cover its costs. I always thought the disconnect included more things than just the revenue picture.
I'm not sure anyone in Main Hall realizes what it takes to build and maintain a successful football program, not a team, a program. What Montana did, and I do mean did, for 20 years was remarkable, both in the thought UM put behind selecting its coaches, and also the way it boosted sponsorship, expanded facilities without going into debt, grew its fanbase in a state so big it really is asking something of people to travel hundreds of miles to see your team every home game. Even the televised games egrizzers criticize are a remarkable accomplishment. There are PAC 12 teams that still don't get live coverage of their games in their home state. Montana has pretty much had that for 14 years.
Now UM is nearly two years out from firing hits AD and head coach in the middle of spring practice. UM went from semi finalist to its first losing record in damn near 30 years. It didn't make a purposeful hire in 2012, but rather scrambled to find a coach who could be on the job ready to go by the time the team returned from spring break to finish its spring practice minus an innocent young man the administration was doing all it could to drum out of school.
The facilities upgrades that used to progress fairly easily have become much more difficult. Somwehere, I still have the email Engstrom issued to GSA members in the spring of 2012 that the study center was on track and construction was going to begin later that year. Guess it wasn't as easy as shaking the booster money tree after all.
We're due for an increase in ticket prices in 2014. Sounds like the sideline sections without chair backs will be getting them next year and the buy in to sit there will increase significantly. Are fans ready for that, or is this an example of the administration assuming Griz fans will pony up and show up no matter what?
The administration, it seems gets kind of caught up in this notion that Griz football is unsinkable. It's kind of like fans who believe that somehow crowd noise is responsible for Griz victories at home, rather than Griz home victories being responsible for the crowd noise. In fact, in the biggest games this year, UM was very much urging fans days in advance to show up and bring the noise. Turns out it was just that, noise. Coastal Carolina could have cared less. Eastern didn't give a rip and John Blanchette pretty much ridiculed UM for becoming a parody of itself with all its crowd nonsense and all the other smoke and mirrors that now come with Griz football, but do nothing to improve the actual performance.
Will the next Griz football hire be a nepotism hire? Probably. That's not all that unusual in college athletics. You turn to the people you know or the people who know people and they tend to draw a pretty tight circle. So if the next head coach is a Scott Gragg or some coordinator from another FCS school who also happens to have ties to UM and the new AD, don't be surprised. It's always safer to go with what you know, especially when the people advising your are also comfortable with the choice. Before that happens,
the administration and its new AD may have to retrace some steps to get pack to program building instead of assuming Griz football is unsinkable.