That's great for them but the 3-35 is a dinosaur defense. look at the teams that have won the NC lately. quick answer? None of them. Not a single national Championship team.
MSU- 4 man base/multiple
NDSU 4-2-5/hybrid
SDSU 4-3 base/multiple
Sam Houston 4-2-5
JMU 4-2-5
EWU 4-3 base/hybrid
Idk... it might be me, but I think I'd rather see the Griz establish a defense scheme that has proved it's dominance being run by multiple national championship teams. I'm not a football genius though. I just look at what has produced winning teams and non winning teams.
Okay you can argue that Illinois State almost won the Natty running a 3-3-5, but... they didn't.
It can be argued that it was the kickers fault, which it was, and not the defensive scheme.
I would argue had EIU been running a 4-2-5 they would have rolled MSU. We will never know.
It can be argued that the 3-3-5 is a great defense to run at the FCS level because we don't get the "elite" athletes necessary to run a successful 4-2-5. I would argue while that was true PRIOR to the establishment of the portal, it's not true now.
What I know is that the last fourteen national championship teams ran some type of 4-2/3 hybrid defense.
If the players we have now don't like it, there are other teams that run the 3-3-5 and they would probably more than welcome to play on those teams, like idk... Stoneybrook, North Dakota, Bill & Mary, EIU, Villanova, Northern Arizona, Richmond... You know, teams good enough to make deep runs but not actually good enough to take the hardware home.