Hammer said:
Well, please. It's 25.06. The bar's not real high. Shit, this guy could do both of those things:
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
NCAA Sanctions
- Thread starter GrizPony
- Start date
Well, please. It's 25.06. The bar's not real high. Shit, this guy could do both of those things:
NorthwestFresh
Well-known member
getgrizzy said:
When will UM's athletic department learn that even talking about the NCAA case in public is foolish? Who is advising them at this point. I assume there is some law firm specializing in NCAA bylaws who UM is paying for at this point, right?
George Ferguson
Well-known member
Nw, can I ask you an honest question, no smack, no BS. Why do you care so deeply? And please come up with something more original than "I'm a Montanan and the Griz have embarrased the entire state". BY FAR the lamest thing ever posted. I know there are thousands and thousands of Montanan's who couldn't give two dumps about the Griz or Cats.
NorthwestFresh
Well-known member
havgrizfan said:
Because I went to UM, and have a lot of people I know still at UM. I'm guessing I've been to more Griz games over the years than many posters on this board. :shock:
I never posted "I'm a Montanan and the Griz have embarrassed the entire state", by the way. Not sure where that is coming from, but it wasn't me.
George Ferguson
Well-known member
OK. thanks for the honest answer and no stupid smack reply. I didn't say you said the line, i was generalizing, and BTW, it's been posted on BN many, many times. I'll take you at your word on the amount of Griz games you attend each year, though I'm guessin if you attend more than MOST posters on here, you don't attend many Cat games per year then.
NorthwestFresh said:
When will you learn that no one in the athletic dept is talking? When will you learn who UM hired as it's ncaa legal counsel?
It looks like you've finally realized, after 2 months, that some people actually know, generally, what the ncaa matter is about, even if you don't.
It never ceases to amaze me how make people think that no one knows what's going about anything, if they don't know what's going on. Why don't people understand and admit that lots of people may know what's going on, even if they don't know what's going on?
It seems that the NCAA has not issued its final results so UM is waiting for the report. All indications are it should be soon. When the report becomes final and issued, from what I understand it WILL be made public for everyone to read. There seems to be issues that are 'unique' to all involved and with NCAA having its own problems the process bogged down. What we do know is the football team is working hard and has as good a chance as any to win the conference and the athletic dept is healthy and has not engaged in serious wrong doing. I believe Haslam said we will be the better for it all. I have no reason not to believe him. So until then..............Go Griz!!!!!!!
Brock Landers
Well-known member
The important thing. Short term, I don't care what we give up, I'm patient and can wait out any recovery.nzone said:
UMGriz75
Well-known member
I don't know the time frame here, but ordinarily, the NCAA will issue a preliminary, confidential, report for the institution to respond to. It has nothing about sanctions, just getting an agreement on the facts and making sure that the facts are the facts. Then the NCAA will issue its "final" report based on whatever comes out of that preliminary review which contains no sanctions, but asks the institution to propose them instead: it is an interesting approach of asking the condemned whether he would enjoy a hanging or a firing squad instead, "your choice!" Except that the NCAA may or may not accept the suggestion and impose drowning instead. The NCAA's approach to penalties and its manner of imposing them in college football would likely offend the Geneva Convention.
So, the "institution" gets a couple of looks at the "report," in progress, without knowing really where the NCAA might be headed, since the NCAA isn't at that point in the process itself. I "understand" without any insider knowledge whatsoever, that the "process" is being finalized, and so there has been some readings of the investigation report, but no knowledge of what the final outcome may be.
So, the "institution" gets a couple of looks at the "report," in progress, without knowing really where the NCAA might be headed, since the NCAA isn't at that point in the process itself. I "understand" without any insider knowledge whatsoever, that the "process" is being finalized, and so there has been some readings of the investigation report, but no knowledge of what the final outcome may be.
EWURanger29
Well-known member
From an outsiders perspective, I think it's kind of ridiculous that this investigation has been going on for over a year and a half with no resolution yet. For that reason alone I think whatever sanctions, if any, the NCAA doles out isn't going to be near as damaging as the second and third order effects that the invetigation itself has caused. If they cite lack of institutional control, my guess is loss of a couple scholarships and maybe a post-season ban. Probably not a whole lot more than that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Catsrback76
Well-known member
'68griz said:
Hey, we could throw a wiener roast and offer free.........
! Sorry, I'll be here all week! :clap: