Montana QB's excelling

[mtgrizrule]

I don't know anything about the kids but my nephew has played basketball and football against the youngest cook. Once again not saying anything about the kids but the dad is not U of Montana material. He is everything we are trying to get away from now. Talented as they may be let them go else where.

Don't know the family, but do know college coaches deal with problematic parents much better than lower level coaches do. I really would not be concerned about a father that likes to have his say now and then. That passes with time. Best of luck to the Cook boys.

 

[George Ferguson]

Grizfan95.....We are all aware of what Dalls' dad has said on EGRIZ. Including that he doesn't want his son to play in-state. BUT...two things. First, to say UM and MSU don't want him is absolutely absurd. He has had a full-ride offer from both schools since the beginning of the 2012 high school season. Secondly, from what I've seen, and from youths who have interacted with him, Dallas is a very nice kid, extremely intelligent, well-spoken and very mature. He also is VERY PROUD to be a Butte Bulldog and I've seen no evidence to suggest he thinks he is too good for Butte High or anywhere else. If he has said, he wants to play college football out-of-state, it's because he is BEING SHOWN that he is indeed GOOD ENOUGH to play beyond the FCS (UM, MSU) level. His father aside, the kid has shown me nothing to suggest he's a prima anything. And believe me, both Delaney and Ash want him BADLY, no matter what you or his dad says.

 

[GrizMusician]

Grizfan95.....We are all aware of what Dalls' dad has said on EGRIZ. Including that he doesn't want his son to play in-state. BUT...two things. First, to say UM and MSU don't want him is absolutely absurd. He has had a full-ride offer from both schools since the beginning of the 2012 high school season. Secondly, from what I've seen, and from youths who have interacted with him, Dallas is a very nice kid, extremely intelligent, well-spoken and very mature. He also is VERY PROUD to be a Butte Bulldog and I've seen no evidence to suggest he thinks he is too good for Butte High or anywhere else. If he has said, he wants to play college football out-of-state, it's because he is BEING SHOWN that he is indeed GOOD ENOUGH to play beyond the FCS (UM, MSU) level. His father aside, the kid has shown me nothing to suggest he's a prima anything. And believe me, both Delaney and Ash want him BADLY, no matter what you or his dad says.

This.

I have met both Dallas & his father. They were both polite to me & seemed like good people. I do not think that the poster claiming to be Mr. Cook was actually him... I think someone was jerking your chains & a few of you ate it up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

 

[Copper Griz]

Grizfan95.....We are all aware of what Dalls' dad has said on EGRIZ. Including that he doesn't want his son to play in-state. BUT...two things. First, to say UM and MSU don't want him is absolutely absurd. He has had a full-ride offer from both schools since the beginning of the 2012 high school season. Secondly, from what I've seen, and from youths who have interacted with him, Dallas is a very nice kid, extremely intelligent, well-spoken and very mature. He also is VERY PROUD to be a Butte Bulldog and I've seen no evidence to suggest he thinks he is too good for Butte High or anywhere else. If he has said, he wants to play college football out-of-state, it's because he is BEING SHOWN that he is indeed GOOD ENOUGH to play beyond the FCS (UM, MSU) level. His father aside, the kid has shown me nothing to suggest he's a prima anything. And believe me, both Delaney and Ash want him BADLY, no matter what you or his dad says.

This.

I have met both Dallas & his father. They were both polite to me & seemed like good people. I do not think that the poster claiming to be Mr. Cook was actually him... I think someone was jerking your chains & a few of you ate it up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I think you are on to something here and maybe someone had a grand old time trolling. Having said that I will reference an interaction I had with an offensive coordinator for one of the BSC schools who has intimate knowledge of this kid's talent level (for the record I NEVER have inside knowledge because I live to damn far away from any activity related to BSC football and I never reference inside information on this board). Having spoken with this coach - both schools want him and believe he is a talent. Neither believes they will get him and
his father is the #1 reason. He has made no bones about telling anyone who will listen that he wants his son to play out of state for a D1 school. There is a definite belief his son can and will play at a level above FCS. I got the impression this coach felt the Dad was a pain in the ass and a impediment for recruiting. (Probably fits description of most parents with a talented son or daughter who are being recruited when they are juniors). Granted - the Dad should be touting his kids talent and should be his #1 fan. Unfortunately, there seems to be a little bit of "living vicariously through his son" that is occurring. I do not think he has a very high probability of being a Griz or a Can't - unless he totally whiffs during his senior year and fails to impress the few D1 schools who may be interested. For his sake I hope he kicks rump this year and fulfills his dreams. Big emphasis on HIS.

 

[Cats2506]

Grizfan95.....We are all aware of what Dalls' dad has said on EGRIZ. Including that he doesn't want his son to play in-state. BUT...two things. First, to say UM and MSU don't want him is absolutely absurd. He has had a full-ride offer from both schools since the beginning of the 2012 high school season. Secondly, from what I've seen, and from youths who have interacted with him, Dallas is a very nice kid, extremely intelligent, well-spoken and very mature. He also is VERY PROUD to be a Butte Bulldog and I've seen no evidence to suggest he thinks he is too good for Butte High or anywhere else. If he has said, he wants to play college football out-of-state, it's because he is BEING SHOWN that he is indeed GOOD ENOUGH to play beyond the FCS (UM, MSU) level. His father aside, the kid has shown me nothing to suggest he's a prima anything. And believe me, both Delaney and Ash want him BADLY, no matter what you or his dad says.

This.

I have met both Dallas & his father. They were both polite to me & seemed like good people. I do not think that the poster claiming to be Mr. Cook was actually him... I think someone was jerking your chains & a few of you ate it up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I think you are on to something here and maybe someone had a grand old time trolling. Having said that I will reference an interaction I had with an offensive coordinator for one of the BSC schools who has intimate knowledge of this kid's talent level (for the record I NEVER have inside knowledge because I live to damn far away from any activity related to BSC football and I never reference inside information on this board). Having spoken with this coach - both schools want him and believe he is a talent. Neither believes they will get him and
his father is the #1 reason. He has made no bones about telling anyone who will listen that he wants his son to play out of state for a D1 school. There is a definite belief his son can and will play at a level above FCS. I got the impression this coach felt the Dad was a pain in the ass and a impediment for recruiting. (Probably fits description of most parents with a talented son or daughter who are being recruited when they are juniors). Granted - the Dad should be touting his kids talent and should be his #1 fan. Unfortunately, there seems to be a little bit of "living vicariously through his son" that is occurring. I do not think he has a very high probability of being a Griz or a Can't - unless he totally whiffs during his senior year and fails to impress the few D1 schools who may be interested. For his sake I hope he kicks rump this year and fulfills his dreams. Big emphasis on HIS.

Either you are full of it or "some BSC OC" needs to be informed what the NCAA recruiting regs are, I highly doubt its the latter.

 

[Copper Griz]

Grizfan95.....We are all aware of what Dalls' dad has said on EGRIZ. Including that he doesn't want his son to play in-state. BUT...two things. First, to say UM and MSU don't want him is absolutely absurd. He has had a full-ride offer from both schools since the beginning of the 2012 high school season. Secondly, from what I've seen, and from youths who have interacted with him, Dallas is a very nice kid, extremely intelligent, well-spoken and very mature. He also is VERY PROUD to be a Butte Bulldog and I've seen no evidence to suggest he thinks he is too good for Butte High or anywhere else. If he has said, he wants to play college football out-of-state, it's because he is BEING SHOWN that he is indeed GOOD ENOUGH to play beyond the FCS (UM, MSU) level. His father aside, the kid has shown me nothing to suggest he's a prima anything. And believe me, both Delaney and Ash want him BADLY, no matter what you or his dad says.

This.

I have met both Dallas & his father. They were both polite to me & seemed like good people. I do not think that the poster claiming to be Mr. Cook was actually him... I think someone was jerking your chains & a few of you ate it up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I think you are on to something here and maybe someone had a grand old time trolling. Having said that I will reference an interaction I had with an offensive coordinator for one of the BSC schools who has intimate knowledge of this kid's talent level (for the record I NEVER have inside knowledge because I live to damn far away from any activity related to BSC football and I never reference inside information on this board). Having spoken with this coach - both schools want him and believe he is a talent. Neither believes they will get him and
his father is the #1 reason. He has made no bones about telling anyone who will listen that he wants his son to play out of state for a D1 school. There is a definite belief his son can and will play at a level above FCS. I got the impression this coach felt the Dad was a pain in the ass and a impediment for recruiting. (Probably fits description of most parents with a talented son or daughter who are being recruited when they are juniors). Granted - the Dad should be touting his kids talent and should be his #1 fan. Unfortunately, there seems to be a little bit of "living vicariously through his son" that is occurring. I do not think he has a very high probability of being a Griz or a Can't - unless he totally whiffs during his senior year and fails to impress the few D1 schools who may be interested. For his sake I hope he kicks rump this year and fulfills his dreams. Big emphasis on HIS.

Either you are full of it or "some BSC OC" needs to be informed what the NCAA recruiting regs are, I highly doubt its the latter.

I really don't care which of the two positions you take and I think you better check the recruiting regs. Now carry on with being the usual small endowed individual you are.

 

[Cats2506]

This.

I have met both Dallas & his father. They were both polite to me & seemed like good people. I do not think that the poster claiming to be Mr. Cook was actually him... I think someone was jerking your chains & a few of you ate it up.

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2

I think you are on to something here and maybe someone had a grand old time trolling. Having said that I will reference an interaction I had with an offensive coordinator for one of the BSC schools who has intimate knowledge of this kid's talent level (for the record I NEVER have inside knowledge because I live to damn far away from any activity related to BSC football and I never reference inside information on this board). Having spoken with this coach - both schools want him and believe he is a talent. Neither believes they will get him and
his father is the #1 reason. He has made no bones about telling anyone who will listen that he wants his son to play out of state for a D1 school. There is a definite belief his son can and will play at a level above FCS. I got the impression this coach felt the Dad was a pain in the ass and a impediment for recruiting. (Probably fits description of most parents with a talented son or daughter who are being recruited when they are juniors). Granted - the Dad should be touting his kids talent and should be his #1 fan. Unfortunately, there seems to be a little bit of "living vicariously through his son" that is occurring. I do not think he has a very high probability of being a Griz or a Can't - unless he totally whiffs during his senior year and fails to impress the few D1 schools who may be interested. For his sake I hope he kicks rump this year and fulfills his dreams. Big emphasis on HIS.

Either you are full of it or "some BSC OC" needs to be informed what the NCAA recruiting regs are, I highly doubt its the latter.

I really don't care which of the two positions you take and I think you better check the recruiting regs. Now carry on with being the usual small endowed individual you are.

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

 

[Copper Griz]

I think you are on to something here and maybe someone had a grand old time trolling. Having said that I will reference an interaction I had with an offensive coordinator for one of the BSC schools who has intimate knowledge of this kid's talent level (for the record I NEVER have inside knowledge because I live to damn far away from any activity related to BSC football and I never reference inside information on this board). Having spoken with this coach - both schools want him and believe he is a talent. Neither believes they will get him and
his father is the #1 reason. He has made no bones about telling anyone who will listen that he wants his son to play out of state for a D1 school. There is a definite belief his son can and will play at a level above FCS. I got the impression this coach felt the Dad was a pain in the ass and a impediment for recruiting. (Probably fits description of most parents with a talented son or daughter who are being recruited when they are juniors). Granted - the Dad should be touting his kids talent and should be his #1 fan. Unfortunately, there seems to be a little bit of "living vicariously through his son" that is occurring. I do not think he has a very high probability of being a Griz or a Can't - unless he totally whiffs during his senior year and fails to impress the few D1 schools who may be interested. For his sake I hope he kicks rump this year and fulfills his dreams. Big emphasis on HIS.

Either you are full of it or "some BSC OC" needs to be informed what the NCAA recruiting regs are, I highly doubt its the latter.

I really don't care which of the two positions you take and I think you better check the recruiting regs. Now carry on with being the usual small endowed individual you are.

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

 

[wbtfg]

Not sure of all the particulars, but generally a coach cant discuss a recruitable athlete.

 

[Copper Griz]

Not sure of all the particulars, but generally a coach cant discuss a recruitable athlete.

Then this coached crossed a line he shouldn't have. I believe the NCAA would have a tough time enforcing/punishing in this case. The NCAA does not make sense to me, but the coach apparently should have known better. Did not even hesitate to discuss. I guess I would like to know the parameters of the rule. Can't discuss with anyone or someone associated with the potential recruit? Coaches would be in violation all over the place if it was "can't discuss period." Time to do some investigating.

 

[Cats2506]

Either you are full of it or "some BSC OC" needs to be informed what the NCAA recruiting regs are, I highly doubt its the latter.

I really don't care which of the two positions you take and I think you better check the recruiting regs. Now carry on with being the usual small endowed individual you are.

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

I never assumed it was the fizz coach, rather I suspected it was another based on the way you put it out, It was the fizz AD that mentioned working toward a culture of compliance, you being a fizz fan It is easy to see that you need education since you have admittedly asked coaches questions which they should not answer, that is a rude thing to do, to put a coach in that position.

I said they might get away with it if they had not offered, I didn't say that it still wouldn't be a minor violation. If that coaches team has or will ever made even an inquiry about the kid then the NCAA could classify him as a possible recruit. All of the coaches I know are aware of this, like I said the standard answer about any kid that has not signed a LOI or is on scholarship is "I cant discuss it". evidently you are not aware that communication with and about recruits is a very touchy situation with the NCAA. I think your AD may have a steep hill to climb with fans like you

 

[grizindabox]

 

[Copper Griz]

I really don't care which of the two positions you take and I think you better check the recruiting regs. Now carry on with being the usual small endowed individual you are.

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

I never assumed it was the fizz coach, rather I suspected it was another based on the way you put it out, It was the fizz AD that mentioned working toward a culture of compliance, you being a fizz fan It is easy to see that you need education since you have admittedly asked coaches questions which they should not answer, that is a rude thing to do, to put a coach in that position.

I said they might get away with it if they had not offered, I didn't say that it still wouldn't be a minor violation. If that coaches team has or will ever made even an inquiry about the kid then the NCAA could classify him as a possible recruit. All of the coaches I know are aware of this, like I said the standard answer about any kid that has not signed a LOI or is on scholarship is "I cant discuss it". evidently you are not aware that communication with and about recruits is a very touchy situation with the NCAA. I think your AD may have a steep hill to climb with fans like you

It would be another schools AD that would have the steep hill to climb in this instance. Interesting though, from your post you now apparently believe my story - unlike your first post. Make up your mind. Man you are easily swayed. .

 

[EverettGriz]

I really don't care which of the two positions you take and I think you better check the recruiting regs. Now carry on with being the usual small endowed individual you are.

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

I never assumed it was the fizz coach, rather I suspected it was another based on the way you put it out, It was the fizz AD that mentioned working toward a culture of compliance, you being a fizz fan It is easy to see that you need education since you have admittedly asked coaches questions which they should not answer, that is a rude thing to do, to put a coach in that position.

I said they might get away with it if they had not offered, I didn't say that it still wouldn't be a minor violation. If that coaches team has or will ever made even an inquiry about the kid then the NCAA could classify him as a possible recruit. All of the coaches I know are aware of this, like I said the standard answer about any kid that has not signed a LOI or is on scholarship is "I cant discuss it". evidently you are not aware that communication with and about recruits is a very touchy situation with the NCAA. I think your AD may have a steep hill to climb with fans like you

It's a good thing your program has boosters who take the lead on calling and recruiting kids who've committed to other universities so that the coaching staff doesn't have to....

 

[Cats2506]

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

I never assumed it was the fizz coach, rather I suspected it was another based on the way you put it out, It was the fizz AD that mentioned working toward a culture of compliance, you being a fizz fan It is easy to see that you need education since you have admittedly asked coaches questions which they should not answer, that is a rude thing to do, to put a coach in that position.

I said they might get away with it if they had not offered, I didn't say that it still wouldn't be a minor violation. If that coaches team has or will ever made even an inquiry about the kid then the NCAA could classify him as a possible recruit. All of the coaches I know are aware of this, like I said the standard answer about any kid that has not signed a LOI or is on scholarship is "I cant discuss it". evidently you are not aware that communication with and about recruits is a very touchy situation with the NCAA. I think your AD may have a steep hill to climb with fans like you

It would be another schools AD that would have the steep hill to climb in this instance. Interesting though, from your post you now apparently believe my story - unlike your first post. Make up your mind. Man you are easily swayed. .

The reason your AD has a seep hil is because he has fan's/boosters like you that are totally ignorant of what can and cannot be done.

 

[Cats2506]

So you are saying that a coach can discuss a recruit with any random person :thumb:

I at least know enough to not ask those types questions but have heard coaches response when they are asked about specific recruits and it is invariably "I cant discuss that", generally they can't even confirm or deny that they are recruiting the individual.

Now if this was a coach for a team that had not offered a recruit and had no intention of offering then they might be able to get away with it.

Maybe this kind of stuff is what your AD was talking about in needing to "move toward a culture of compliance"

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

I never assumed it was the fizz coach, rather I suspected it was another based on the way you put it out, It was the fizz AD that mentioned working toward a culture of compliance, you being a fizz fan It is easy to see that you need education since you have admittedly asked coaches questions which they should not answer, that is a rude thing to do, to put a coach in that position.

I said they might get away with it if they had not offered, I didn't say that it still wouldn't be a minor violation. If that coaches team has or will ever made even an inquiry about the kid then the NCAA could classify him as a possible recruit. All of the coaches I know are aware of this, like I said the standard answer about any kid that has not signed a LOI or is on scholarship is "I cant discuss it". evidently you are not aware that communication with and about recruits is a very touchy situation with the NCAA. I think your AD may have a steep hill to climb with fans like you

It's a good thing your program has boosters who take the lead on calling and recruiting kids who've committed to other universities so that the coaching staff doesn't have to....

as usual, your thought is incoherent

 

[NorthwestFresh]

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

Correct. A coach can't discuss any PSA, regardless of if there is an offer out to him/her. An OC talking to a fan/booster about PSAs is an NCAA violation. You may want to email the coach and/or UM compliance so the rest of the coaches know that talking about PSAs to the general public is against NCAA recruiting policy.

 

[Cats2506]

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

Correct. A coach can't discuss any PSA, regardless of if there is an offer out to him/her. An OC talking to a fan/booster about PSAs is an NCAA violation. You may want to email the coach and/or UM compliance so the rest of the coaches know that talking about PSAs to the general public is against NCAA recruiting policy.

At least there is one other poster here that knows something :thumb:

So what is it CG, is your original story BS (likely) or was that coach in violation ov the NCAA (unlikely)

 

[EverettGriz]

I don't remember saying this coach made him an official offer, so are you saying a coach can't discuss a kid when asked about him - when an offer is not even on the table yet? I broached the subject with the coach - not the other way around and why do you reference the Griz AD and program? You falsely assumed the coach I referenced was a Griz. Not the case and there are other BSC conference coaches who are in Montana and travel for certain events. Some of them are even nice people who carry on conversations and talk about football because they understand this is a small state and connections are very important. It is who you know frequently, not what you know. So you keep making your assumptions. Assume. Makes an ass out of you!!!

I never assumed it was the fizz coach, rather I suspected it was another based on the way you put it out, It was the fizz AD that mentioned working toward a culture of compliance, you being a fizz fan It is easy to see that you need education since you have admittedly asked coaches questions which they should not answer, that is a rude thing to do, to put a coach in that position.

I said they might get away with it if they had not offered, I didn't say that it still wouldn't be a minor violation. If that coaches team has or will ever made even an inquiry about the kid then the NCAA could classify him as a possible recruit. All of the coaches I know are aware of this, like I said the standard answer about any kid that has not signed a LOI or is on scholarship is "I cant discuss it". evidently you are not aware that communication with and about recruits is a very touchy situation with the NCAA. I think your AD may have a steep hill to climb with fans like you

It's a good thing your program has boosters who take the lead on calling and recruiting kids who've committed to other universities so that the coaching staff doesn't have to....

as usual, your thought is incoherent

Nice tap out for triple bogey.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[brian s]

Oh Gee, yet another football thread turned into a pissing contest between scat fans trolling our board, and Griz fans willing to play-down to their sophomoric level. Thanks guys for ruining another thread.