Jaredkuehn said:
This why Bobby Hauck is a risky hire for UM, or at the very least a polarizing hire. Fair or not, this article represents Bobby Hauck to a lot of Missoulians that are not football fans. We, as football fans, follow the team and follow players after these events occur. The vast majority of Montanans and alumni likely only read the headlines and form opinions based a snap judgment. The risk you run is alienating a lot of residents and alumni who are not football fans and DO get their news from the Missoulian.
I fear that a Hauck hire could be a PR disaster for UM at a critical moment in its history. It sounds like it’s as good as done, so I hope I’m wrong...but it could be bumpy ride.
Thing is, when it comes to Griz athletics, and especially the football team, nothing gets by the Missoulian. Nothing. They will milk every last drop of information to make a headline in
BIG BOLD LETTERS on the front page.
It isn't going to be any different with a coach other than Hauck. If something happens, regardless of how severe they will most certainly sensationalize it. No passes here.
How to solve the problem? Do what you can to recruit players with good values and do your best as coaches and mentors to keep their asses out of trouble.
Bobby gets hired, a year or two goes by with minimal incidents (there is always some...under Stitt, under Choat) we start winning, get back to selling out the stadium and people tend to forget.
It's only going to be a bumpy ride if there's trouble, it doesn't matter who the HC is.