• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts access private forums and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!

JJ Trial

PolsonGrizFan said:
Judge said state has used up 665 minutes so far; defense is at 535. #johnsontrial They can't go over a certain limit, around 1,100.

What does this mean? Some kind of humor?


No thats what it means. Paoli originally wanted to call twenty five character witnesses. The judge limited him to 5. then they agreed to 1140 minutes each instead to present their case. Not sure whether that includes closings or not though.

Tomorrow should be interesting, seems there is new evidence from the prosecution....
 
Looks like one of the last few remarks includes the mention of new evidence the prosecution will present tomorrow.
 
BWahlberg said:
Looks like one of the last few remarks includes the mention of new evidence the prosecution will present tomorrow.

Interesting. I didn't know they could present new evidence this late.
 
PTGrizzly said:
BWahlberg said:
Looks like one of the last few remarks includes the mention of new evidence the prosecution will present tomorrow.

Interesting. I didn't know they could present new evidence this late.

Ball-Hair splatter from the head of the bed no doubt. According to CSI New York, Ball-Hair splatter is characteristic of doggy-style rape.
 
Did she not send a text to one of her friends saying," I think I may have been raped". I THINK I MAY HAVE BEEN RAPED!!!!, THINK!!!!, I think if you were raped there would not be much question about it. :roll:. Personally I think she was pressured into pushing this case by either a friend that hates the athletes or by legal council wanting to make a buck. And knowing the powder keg that was already in place by other problems with other team members this was going to be a slam dunk no matter guilty or not.
 
PTGrizzly said:
BWahlberg said:
Looks like one of the last few remarks includes the mention of new evidence the prosecution will present tomorrow.

Interesting. I didn't know they could present new evidence this late.

Two Missoulian Tweets:

Judge Townsend is talking with lawyers about meeting earlier Thursday morning to talk about video evidence and a transcript

Paoli: Your honor I'm anticipating the prosecution has a little more information for me and I'm going to get that now. Agreed.
 
50 pages!!!!!! Well done, people; I estimate we will be at 85 when done; your friend, Yogi P>S> has it been determined if it is physically possible to be raped doggie style???
 
grizare#1 said:
Did she not send a text to one of her friends saying," I think I may have been raped". I THINK I MAY HAVE BEEN RAPED!!!!, THINK!!!!, I think if you were raped there would not be much question about it. :roll:. Personally I think she was pressured into pushing this case by either a friend that hates the athletes or by legal council wanting to make a buck. And knowing the powder keg that was already in place by other problems with other team members this was going to be a slam dunk no matter guilty or not.

Yep. Is that like saying "I'm kind of pregnant"?
 
yogi said:
50 pages!!!!!! Well done, people; I estimate we will be at 85 when done; your friend, Yogi P>S> has it been determined if it is physically possible to be raped doggie style???
It happens daily in the joint
eGlub21pMTI=_o_prison-spoon-rape.jpg


Sent from my ADR6400L using Tapatalk 2
 
yogi said:
50 pages!!!!!! Well done, people; I estimate we will be at 85 when done; your friend, Yogi P>S> has it been determined if it is physically possible to be raped doggie style???

Several eGrizers are working overtime together to either prove or disprove this assumption. :thumb: Don't ask for names.
 
With all the theories and conspiracies I'm seeing in this thread, I'm confident I will finally find out who was on the hill in Dallas that day. Should also find the truth behind Roswell.
 
ordigger said:
With all the theories and conspiracies I'm seeing in this thread, I'm confident I will finally find out who was on the hill in Dallas that day. Should also find the truth behind Roswell.

Well duh! It was obviously JJ. I distinctly remember JFK texting someone saying... "OMG, I think I may have just been shot!"
 
Today was the 1st day where I actually some possibility (still very slight) of JJ being guilty of something, but still not enough to 100% convince me without doubt. I do wonder a few things.
(1) Was Jane Doe's emotional state and tears from other things in life, combined with some stress from things playing out with JJ the way they did? Or 100% from being JJ truly raping her? Again, something I doubt the prosecution can prove. I do believe Jane Doe has been going through a very tough stage of life as an young adult, and this added to it.

(2) WTF is up with her parents wanting to know the actions the school was taking out of concern for their daughter? They supported her then, but now don't support her story for this trial? Yet they took the time to speak to the school, and shortly thereafter O'day and Pflu were fired, or whatever you call it? It does not make sense to me either way. Is it possible the parents and accuser jumped the gun, got 2 good men fired, then with time realized they made a mistake on their initial thoughts?

Seriously, I hope somehow in this trial her mother and/or father are put on the stand. If not this trial in a civil trial that Pflu or O'day may bring forward later on.

This case just does not make sense to me. Still questioning why it went to trial?
 
mtgrizrule said:
Seriously, I hope somehow in this trial her mother and/or father are put on the stand. If not for this trial. If not this trial in a civil trial that Pflu or O'day may bring forward later on.

This case just does not make sense to me. Still questioning why it went to trial?
Yeah, I was thinking the same. Why was her mom so reluctant that 'Jane Doe' had to threaten her?
 
mtgrizrule said:
Seriously, I hope somehow in this trial her mother and/or father are put on the stand. If not for this trial. If not this trial in a civil trial that Pflu or O'day may bring forward later on.
Who do you expect would be defendents in a Pflu/O'Day civil trial? I'm pretty sure in accepting their remaining contract pay that they signed away any action against UM.
 
kemajic said:
mtgrizrule said:
Seriously, I hope somehow in this trial her mother and/or father are put on the stand. If not for this trial. If not this trial in a civil trial that Pflu or O'day may bring forward later on.
Who do you expect would be defendents in a Pflu/O'Day civil trial? I'm pretty sure in accepting their remaining contract pay that they signed away any action against UM.

Your guess is as good as mine. I do think the information and further actions are being kept under wraps until after this trial, and/or each of their original contracts are up. Legal actions or not, I don't see how some pretty influential backers will accept not being given more answers than we know so far.

I know for fact O'day feels everything will come out in due time. I have no reason to doubt Jim. Their dismissals are far from over for RE and the BOR.
 
what kind of argument would o'day and pflugrad have? "they did not renew my contract because i did a shitty job leading the department, they fired me because they thought i did a shitty job leading the department"?
 
Back
Top