Just an observation:
I enjoy reading UMGriz75's posts on the trial. Yes, he has a bias in favor of the defendant in this case, and he readily admits it, but it seems to me to be based on his reading of the evidence and his overall conclusion that Jordan Johnson has been wronged in the "court of public opinion."
I don't always agree with him, but I get where he's coming from and I appreciate his explanations.
What's disappointing to me in this thread are the crude, vulgar, and/or snarky posts about Gwen Florio or women in general. I realize some people are just trying to be witty, or get a laugh out of their buddies, but honestly, how do you think those posts come across to objective, disinterested people who are reading this forum? I don't think they reflect well on Jordan Johnson, UM athletics, or the male half of the human race. Overall, I think they just reinforce the worst stereotypes that some people try to perpetuate about athletes, men or both.
So I'm just asking people to think before they post. Look, I'm a dumbass and I go for the cheap laughs, but I realize there's a line I can't cross. I'm just asking people to look for that line. It's in everbody's best interests.