JJ Charged With Rape

[Harm]

hmmmm, who knows, maybe she has a history of such things with past "Booty calls."...... One never knows do they.....or do they? The trial should be informative....

 

[JBS]

That or the JJ can't be found guilty thread is more interesting or the fact that most folks know exactly what attitudes/actions I have been referring toare, and are a bit nervous as to what the NCAA will find and whether it comes before or after the DOJ and DOE reports. Everybody has a story or two from the "dress code" at a certain running backs after game parties, The non gang rape which reflects on the department almost as badly as if she had been roofied (which is still being investigated) Its just not wise to put them all in one place.

My wifes grandfather was one of the most succesful border guards od all time in terms of busts. They brought him in to learn his great investigative techniques they were disappointed. His answer was to simply hang out at the area bars on Friday and Saturday night. Hear the NCAA guys have been spotted at both Reds and the MO club. I have heard more than one doofus bragging about his inside connections with everyone from the players to Monte

Good Lord! Will you admit you have an agenda already? You have all of these adopted kids, apparently at least some of which were problem kids, who have grown up to be judges, social workers, pastors, et al, et al, and no mistakes. Now you have the worlds greatest border guard in your family too. If I were Chuck Norris, or the Worlds Most Interesting Man, I would be jealous of you. Problem is that you are full of sh**. You showed up on this board when all of this started, with an agenda, and you will disappear when it is over. I read where one guy called you intelligent and I almost gagged. You are phony, and I still think you are a woman. I admit my bias. I believe JJ. I am jaded against women. I also admit I am generalizing here, but women are manipulative, vindictive, and vengeful when things don't go there way. There are exceptions, of course, like my 2 teenage daughters, one of which is going to be a brain surgeon, and the other an astro-physicist(I keed, I keed). Remember, I admitted to everything that was bias, off colored, or sexist. Try it.

Nobody with a life can sit at their computer and post on this board from morning until early morning (next day) unless they are getting paid for it or truly have no life. I have things to do, like a job, and more importantly doing stuff with my kids(although I am probably a bad parent in your estimation). I judge you because you judge everyone else.

 

[GrizPony]

This! :thumb:

 

[nzone]

Well said JBS :clap: :clap:

 

[Growler1]

Your posts show you made up your "gluteous mind" quite some time ago bud. I'm going to nickname you "PC-Spiffy" because you always know the "right" side to side with early.

P.S. Reading texts FROM THE ACCUSER is not speculation. Use a speculum to pull your head out and wake up.

argie, I think he's got you there! The evidence is out there if you take the time to find it. She has ZERO case, my friend!

I don't agree with G1 often, but he's absolutely correct on this. JJ hooked up with a psycho whore and it bit him in the arse.....hard.

maybe he did, but the official description of events put forward so far (by the prosecutor and johnson's lawyer) can be interpreted in multiple ways. that is all the information i'm going to believe at this point, and i'm certainly not going to buy in to all the conjecture and unsubstantiated claims.

it is good to be skeptical - of both sides. women make false reports, and in the missoula 'justice' system there is without a doubt a strong bias to simply believe a woman's story (karen orzech comes to mind). but then again, some guys are just shitty people who would screw an uncooperative (and unaroused) partner.

i don't know what happened, and neither do you. all you know is a bunch of gossip and what johnson's lawyer has crafted.

geez.

Most of us have screws an uncooperative and unaroused partner. Ever been married?

 

[go4two]

I can't believe the detail given in the affidavit, mostly the potential witness list. Why does that need to be public record? Not only could that give some people the ability to put two and two together to figure out the identities of those involved, it also puts the witnesses in a tough spot of people probably prodding them about the matter

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

 

[GrizMusician]

I can't believe the detail given in the affidavit, mostly the potential witness list. Why does that need to be public record? Not only could that give some people the ability to put two and two together to figure out the identities of those involved, it also puts the witnesses in a tough spot of people probably prodding them about the matter

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

You mean... you JUST figured out who it was...?

 

[go4two]

JJ's hetero sexuality is safe. I can confirm it was a she, not a he, nor an it. :thumb:

What disturbs me is how easy it was to figure out. I had a co-worker tell me that you couldn't do it, and it would take weeks or months. I am sure I'm not the only one who is smart enough to figure it out as well. They need to pull the google docs, and black out the witness list ASAP!

 

[ordigger]

I can't believe the detail given in the affidavit, mostly the potential witness list. Why does that need to be public record? Not only could that give some people the ability to put two and two together to figure out the identities of those involved, it also puts the witnesses in a tough spot of people probably prodding them about the matter

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

 

[GrizPony]

So if someone at the Missoulian actually researched something in depth, that would make them a stalker? It's clear why you support the Missoulian now...ignorance is bliss in your world.

 

[argh!]

So if someone at the Missoulian actually researched something in depth, that would make them a stalker? It's clear why you support the Missoulian now...ignorance is bliss in your world.

are you saying you work for the missoulian?

 

[GrizLA]

I can't believe the detail given in the affidavit, mostly the potential witness list. Why does that need to be public record? Not only could that give some people the ability to put two and two together to figure out the identities of those involved, it also puts the witnesses in a tough spot of people probably prodding them about the matter

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

It is interesting you would say that. About a year ago someone here made a comment about tracking an individual's donations to UM. Since I have always given to places "Anonymously" I assumed, incorrectly, apparently, that such gifts would remain non public. I have not given one penny to UM since then. It was a wake up call. The internet is a tool often misused.

 

[GrizPony]

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

It is interesting you would say that. About a year ago someone here made a comment about tracking an individual's donations to UM. Since I have always given to places "Anonymously" I assumed, incorrectly, apparently, that such gifts would remain non public. I have not given one penny to UM since then. It was a wake up call. The internet is a tool often misused.

And Oredigger and Argh are just plain tools.

 

[GrizPony]

So if someone at the Missoulian actually researched something in depth, that would make them a stalker? It's clear why you support the Missoulian now...ignorance is bliss in your world.

are you saying you work for the missoulian?

Try to keep up turbo. These posts have to be read in context. Tough concept for you I know. Please kill yourself.

 

[Mousegriz]

Nice golf last week, Crack!!

 

[argh!]

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

It is interesting you would say that. About a year ago someone here made a comment about tracking an individual's donations to UM. Since I have always given to places "Anonymously" I assumed, incorrectly, apparently, that such gifts would remain non public. I have not given one penny to UM since then. It was a wake up call. The internet is a tool often misused.

And Oredigger and Argh are just plain tools.

oh! you keep just gettin' me with your superior wit! oh! emoticon emoticon! i better go kill myself! hey wait, how could you keep setting me straight on issues like 20 year old men not caring if their sex partners are actually aroused if i'm dead? oh the quandary you have put me in here - to learn from your vastly superior intellect, or to off myself and never again be able to read the enlightened wisdom of "crackgina"?

 

[GrizPony]

Nice golf last week, Crack!!

Thanks! I'm an athlete you know.

 

[GrizLA]

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

It is interesting you would say that. About a year ago someone here made a comment about tracking an individual's donations to UM. Since I have always given to places "Anonymously" I assumed, incorrectly, apparently, that such gifts would remain non public. I have not given one penny to UM since then. It was a wake up call. The internet is a tool often misused.

And Oredigger and Argh are just plain tools.

So what? Better tools than stalker...in fact, I get a kick out of Argh's mindless posts. Which shows how mindless I am, I guess.

 

[go4two]

I can't believe the detail given in the affidavit, mostly the potential witness list. Why does that need to be public record? Not only could that give some people the ability to put two and two together to figure out the identities of those involved, it also puts the witnesses in a tough spot of people probably prodding them about the matter

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

To prove that it could easily be done. JJ's defense team is going to have a tough time discrediting the accuser's allegations. She appears to be very intelligent, an over achiever, and model citizen. I feel sorry for whomever will be on the jury. This is going to be a very tough decision for a juror to make.

 

[PlayerRep]

I thought the same thing about the witness's. Not very smart IMO.

I agree, this is not good for the alleged victim. I was able to figure out who she is in a matter of a few hours using the witness list. I will keep her identity to myself. Google is very powerful, and the legal system needs to re-think what they put out as "public" information.

A little scarey that you spent a couple of hours trying to figure out who she is. Personally I could careless who she is. Why would anyone take that much time to determine whom someone is? Egriz leads to a stalking mentality at times.

To prove that it could easily be done. JJ's defense team is going to have a tough time discrediting the accuser's allegations. She appears to be very intelligent, an over achiever, and model citizen. I feel sorry for whomever will be on the jury. This is going to be a very tough decision for a juror to make.

Huh, hard to discredit her? She will be discredited with her own words and all the inconsistencies in what she's already said. Even if her basic story is "I told him to stop and didn't", and his response is "She cooperated fully and never said no", how does the prosecution show rape "beyond a reasonable doubt" with the facts known so far?