GrizPony
Well-known member
getgrizzy said:crackgina said:Yeah, but there may be plenty of evidence that exonerates him in the emails. If so, he should never be charged because you can't get your reputation and life back, even after an acquittal. That's why a prosecutor's job is to pursue justice, not convictions. Are you dense?
in the motion to dismiss the defense isn't denying that jane doe said "no." the defense isn't denying that j.j. said, "roll over or i'll make you." that stuff kind trumps the texts, which if the motion to dismiss is the biggest they've got aren't all that much.
Jesus, the Motion to Dismiss can NOT be construed as an admission of all things it doesn't directly address. It is addressing only the legal issues contained therein. Lets just admit you don't know anything about the law. I don't have time to give you a law degree and I doubt you could understand if I tried. :roll: