bgbigdog said:grizindabox said:indian-outlaw said:Not sure where you're getting these numbers but I highly doubt it is from the CDC. I just ran the numbers myself and currently there are 97,939 cases of known infections and 3,386 deaths. That is ~3.4% mortality, which is way higher that the flu. Some virologists are predicting that 70% of the worlds population will be effected by this virus. If that is anywhere true then hundreds of millions of people will die.retiredpopo said:heard today from CDC that death rate is actually less than 1%. Liberal media will spin this to make it look like the zombie apocalypse is upon us. Pretty soon they will be reporting a shortage of toilet paper oh wait that was last week.
Why don't they ever report on the recovery rate? Oh because that does not look dismal at all.
The narrative that it is just a media conspiracy to make big daddy Donald look bad doesn't make any sense to a logical person.
I think the key word is "known". How many cases are "unknown"? That is why people tend to think the mortality rate is lower. But if the infection rate is higher, even at a lower mortality rate, it could be a sizable number, and just how many deaths is acceptable?
God has spoken.
Stanford economists have demonstrated that the average value of a year of quality human life is actually closer to about $129,000.
Simple multiplication.
Ps. Old folks can suck it.
I am sure your parents and grandparents appreciate the sentiment.