And then the rb fumbles on screen when he runs into his Ol. 2 easy and unnecessary TD's for Cats.
Mellott running a lot and very effectively. His passing and the Cat passing game are better than last year, but they can't win against good teams with Mellott's and the team's passing game. And their big receiver drops an easy TD pass. Jones is fine, but not like the other 2 backs.
Judged by the first half, all 3 Dakota schools would be winning this game.
On the other hand, the Cats have played fine or better. I assume they will win.
Mellott 7-13 for 124, and 1 TD and 1 (bad) pick.
Mellott 10-124. He's very good and dangerous. The risk is injury the more he runs.
Idaho qb is 10-14 for 159. They need to throw more. Cat's pass D and secondary is weak.
282-193 TO.
Go Griz!
Hoops,
Once again you are “cherry picking” the statistics that you want people to hear/see or read in your posts.
Since m, I have been alive the game of football has been played for 60 minutes. At the end of the game and in the box score/record books there is usually no asterisk(s). I will concur that those situations happen.
Do statics or manipulation of them make a team better than another?
From an outsider perspective I would say Coach Hauck is an excellent coach, it’s obvious from his record.
Yes, he does hold the record for the most wins in Big Sky history, which is commendable and should be celebrated.
Is he currently the best coach in your conference? From an outsider perspective I would say that he is not.
You have stated on occasion that he inherited a bad team, they did have a winning record at (7-4) overall and (5-3) in conference play, before Coach Hauck’s return
At Idaho, Coach Eck, took over a program that was (4-7) overall, and (3-5) in the conference.
Yes, your team made it to (1) F S semifinal games and the FCS National Championship game last season, but your rival at MSU, has now made it to three (3) semifinal games, since Hauck returned.
Are the last two head coaches at
rival and Idaho better than Coach Hauck? Time will tell.