Bok_Choi said:
If LJ is the example of what your QB should be able to do within this offense, then it’s hard not to think Britt is that guy. He has a pretty similar set of skills and playing style. We haven’t seen much if the kid from Oregon or Huot, so I have no idea what they bring to the table. But there are and have been freshmen playing QB in the BSC for all of Haucks second run. Most of them have been more than serviceable players.
Developing QB’s isn’t a strength of this staff or of any of Haucks teams because it was almost always a transfer that was counted on to be the guy. And there were some good transfers - no doubt. He doesn’t like underclassmen in any position unless injury backs them into a corner. Look around the BSC. That doesn’t seem to be the prevailing sentiment anywhere.else. If they can play, you devote time to development and let them take their lumps early. Haucks right about one of his coaching philosophies - you get better at playing football by playing football. Not sure we’ll ever know if Britt can really play.
...so true! I think Bobby and Co..are outdated in their philosophy to young QBs (and others)...Vandals QB is a
frosh and is doing quite well..Mellot took the Cats to the NC...so I think its time to put forward your best guys
or loose (3) in a row..
Britt could have been the game changer but we will never know...great Coaches can adapt and take chances to
win the big games...I have not seen that from the Hauck Co...yet! Would Dave Dickenson been the Great if Hauck
were coaching?
Saban's gutsy call when he pulled Jaren Hurts on prime time to take the chance with a unproven back up
to win the Crown...its called being great or okay! Hauck would have not made that call!