Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's an alcohol fueled star football playing thug.
Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
getgrizzy said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
you've got a point with that last sentence. this board has a way of finding someone to blame for everything. even in the beau donaldson case. engstrom, williams, florio, the accuser, dennison...i'm sure there's others, but i can't think of more right now.
tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
yep, she probably doesn't even go to the cops if all these so called friends don't practically talk her into it. it was a total waste of everyone's time.stubbins said:getgrizzy said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
you've got a point with that last sentence. this board has a way of finding someone to blame for everything. even in the beau donaldson case. engstrom, williams, florio, the accuser, dennison...i'm sure there's others, but i can't think of more right now.
how about the zealots that pushed this girl into this to further their agenda? f***[*] like tnt...
getgrizzy said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
you've got a point with that last sentence. this board has a way of finding someone to blame for everything. even in the beau donaldson case. engstrom, williams, florio, the accuser, dennison...i'm sure there's others, but i can't think of more right now. oh yeah, the missoula cops, the n.c.a.a., the d.o.j., the d.o.e., several other u.m. administrators.
Raider said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
This is a stretch, even for you.
Honest question (which I am sure you will avoid).
What are you going to do when this is all over? Your purpose on this board is down to the last couple days, one way or another. What will fill the void?
oh this guy named milt, but i don't know what name he posts by on here. milt says it was the environment in missoula created by the d.o.j. among others.Griz2k said:getgrizzy said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
you've got a point with that last sentence. this board has a way of finding someone to blame for everything. even in the beau donaldson case. engstrom, williams, florio, the accuser, dennison...i'm sure there's others, but i can't think of more right now. oh yeah, the missoula cops, the n.c.a.a., the d.o.j., the d.o.e., several other u.m. administrators.
Donaldson admitted it. Who put the blame on someone else like you're suggesting? Certainly not me.
getgrizzy said:oh this guy named milt, but i don't know what name he posts by on here. milt says it was the environment in missoula created by the d.o.j. among others.Griz2k said:getgrizzy said:tnt said:Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
you've got a point with that last sentence. this board has a way of finding someone to blame for everything. even in the beau donaldson case. engstrom, williams, florio, the accuser, dennison...i'm sure there's others, but i can't think of more right now. oh yeah, the missoula cops, the n.c.a.a., the d.o.j., the d.o.e., several other u.m. administrators.
Donaldson admitted it. Who put the blame on someone else like you're suggesting? Certainly not me.
tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
thanks for clarifying that milt.stubbins said:getgrizzy said:oh this guy named milt, but i don't know what name he posts by on here. milt says it was the environment in missoula created by the d.o.j. among others.Griz2k said:getgrizzy said:you've got a point with that last sentence. this board has a way of finding someone to blame for everything. even in the beau donaldson case. engstrom, williams, florio, the accuser, dennison...i'm sure there's others, but i can't think of more right now. oh yeah, the missoula cops, the n.c.a.a., the d.o.j., the d.o.e., several other u.m. administrators.
Donaldson admitted it. Who put the blame on someone else like you're suggesting? Certainly not me.
nice try...Milt didn't blame the environment as an excuse to what Donaldson did, he blamed the environment for the harshness of the sentence. But don't let that little difference get in your way.
tnt said:Raider said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
This is a stretch, even for you.
Honest question (which I am sure you will avoid).
What are you going to do when this is all over? Your purpose on this board is down to the last couple days, one way or another. What will fill the void?
Spring ball is not too far away, there are at least a few posters on this board who know something about football hopefully they will have something to say. I was here long before this mess and will be for a long while after.
getgrizzy said:thanks for clarifying that milt.stubbins said:getgrizzy said:oh this guy named milt, but i don't know what name he posts by on here. milt says it was the environment in missoula created by the d.o.j. among others.Griz2k said:Donaldson admitted it. Who put the blame on someone else like you're suggesting? Certainly not me.
nice try...Milt didn't blame the environment as an excuse to what Donaldson did, he blamed the environment for the harshness of the sentence. But don't let that little difference get in your way.
Griz2k said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
You could not be more wrong. Show me one person that doesn't think JJ belongs in jail if he actually did rape this girl. I'd sure say he does. Problem is there is no evidence at all that he did and if there is a hung jury the only possible explanation is someone there had a preconceived account of guilt because there is no way in hell you could convict with what the state put forth. Beyond a reasonable doubt? Not a chance.
joined March 31, 2012tnt said:Raider said:tnt said:Griz2k said:tnt is placing himself in a no lose situation. If JJ is found guilty, he'll applaud. If it's a hung jury, he'll say he was right. If he's acquitted, he'll say it's only because he's a star football player.
Probably none of the above.......
The only real agenda most of you have is defending the program, and the fired coach and AD. under some misconception that an acquital (or stong majority in a hung Jury) will will make everything right The DOJ, DOE and NCAA will all go away the reputation of the school, program and individuals involved will all be restored. And if that fails it can all be blamed on the girl.
This is a stretch, even for you.
Honest question (which I am sure you will avoid).
What are you going to do when this is all over? Your purpose on this board is down to the last couple days, one way or another. What will fill the void?
Spring ball is not too far away, there are at least a few posters on this board who know something about football hopefully they will have something to say. I was here long before this mess and will be for a long while after.