6 yards on the ground and 6 lousy points. This offense is not as special as some of you seem to think.bgbigdog said:An offense that can only manage a big 6 yards rushing isn't an offense, it's a loss waiting to happen.
6 yards on the ground and 6 lousy points. This offense is not as special as some of you seem to think.bgbigdog said:An offense that can only manage a big 6 yards rushing isn't an offense, it's a loss waiting to happen.
stegsgrizz said:So lots of beating up of 75, but why would it have hurt to go with Simis for a few series today? Brady did struggle some against teams that had a solid D game plan, and the O didn't make good adjustments which falls back on the coaching staff. Does that fit your agenda?
kemajic said:6 yards on the ground and 6 lousy points. This offense is not as special as some of you seem to think.bgbigdog said:An offense that can only manage a big 6 yards rushing isn't an offense, it's a loss waiting to happen.
I coach college athletes. They HATE it too.havgrizfan said:I coach high school athletes, and I know 99 percent of the time, they absolute HATE when parents, relatives, do this kind of thing.
bigkid said:Bottom line is that none of the QB's are that good. I think it hilarious in previous posts where some think Brady will be on the Payton watch list at the beginning of next year. Good grief!
bigkid said:This offense is predictable. It was a feeding frenzy to ndsu's defense. Sad part is it's still rebuilding as will be the defense with the seniors we lose.
PlayerRep said:Who wants to bet me $100 tonight that Brady is the starting QB next fall, unless, of course, he gets hurt?
This is not the only problem with the UM running game. No really good RB, no H-back or tight ends; this offense is not set up for running. It's not going against RMAC defenses.Copper Griz said:grizfan47 said:Without an offensive line that can block four down linemen which means no running game it won't matter who the quarterback is.
Finally - someone points out the obvious flaw. No DOLA and the athletes needed for the O line just are not in place yet. Going to take some time.
kemajic said:This is not the only problem with the UM running game. No really good RB, no H-back or tight ends; this offense is not set up for running. It's not going against RMAC defenses.Copper Griz said:grizfan47 said:Without an offensive line that can block four down linemen which means no running game it won't matter who the quarterback is.
Finally - someone points out the obvious flaw. No DOLA and the athletes needed for the O line just are not in place yet. Going to take some time.
He missed the Simis performance at PSU.UMGriz75 said:No, four interceptions, under "perfect" conditions speak for themselves to anyone that can hear.uofmman1122 said:Great, we get to listen to this loser for weeks about how Simis should've always been the guy at QB.
Hurray.
stegsgrizz said:this isn''t just about today....and Simis has more trouble figuring out defenses than Gus....
Understand that you are calling out 75 for his "facts" and predictions, but he isn't too far off from calling it correctly. Simis might have troubles figuring out Ds, but he can run/scramble which would have been more than Gus brought to the table the last 6 quarters of play.
PlayerRep said:Who wants to bet me $100 tonight that Brady is the starting QB next fall, unless, of course, he gets hurt?
You were pretty quiet after the EWU, MSU and SDSU games.UMGriz75 said:As I repeatedly asked on the other threads, "OK, what?" and to which you invariably went silent. This idea "Yeah but ..." gets old when that's all there is. The fact is, everything I pointed to three weeks ago came true today, right down to the specific words, "overthrow," "miscommunication," and "interception/fumble." Sad to say. But it was out there and evident to those who looked, and for those who had their minds made up, reality bit hard today.HelenaHandBasket said:I also want to know that with your statistical comparison that anointed SImis the better QB, did you have a component that took into account what the opposing defenses did in each game?
bigkid said:PlayerRep said:Who wants to bet me $100 tonight that Brady is the starting QB next fall, unless, of course, he gets hurt?
Maybe true but it's only because he's the best we have in Stitt's offense. He wouldn't start for most teams. Just sayin![]()
I'll bet you that same 100.00 that we won't win the conference next year with Brady at the wheel.
kemajic said:You were pretty quiet after the EWU, MSU and SDSU games.UMGriz75 said:As I repeatedly asked on the other threads, "OK, what?" and to which you invariably went silent. This idea "Yeah but ..." gets old when that's all there is. The fact is, everything I pointed to three weeks ago came true today, right down to the specific words, "overthrow," "miscommunication," and "interception/fumble." Sad to say. But it was out there and evident to those who looked, and for those who had their minds made up, reality bit hard today.HelenaHandBasket said:I also want to know that with your statistical comparison that anointed SImis the better QB, did you have a component that took into account what the opposing defenses did in each game?