Ok "champ" I will give you another chance. They told both Pabst and O'Day the angle they were approaching this from and asked if they wanted to offer a counter point. Unless you are stupid, and you may well be, that means to counter the "point" they are offering as truth which is the OPPOSITE position of Pabst and O'Day. They interviewed at least four other people before these two were approached and told them that. Maybe they came in objective, haha, but wouldn't you go to the attorneys that prevailed first? History is usually written by the victor. Why go to the County Attorney's office first? They lost right? If you can't follow this logic, then we will just have to disagree on this point. :?