BadlandsGrizFan said:With the amount of talent that is going to be around Cam on this offense next year...all he has to do is be a distributor...point guard type. Get the ball in the right guys hands and dont turn the ball over.
Be accurate when throwing swing passes to Knight....know when checking out of a pass and handing off to Ostmo and Knight is the right move....push the ball down field to Toure....hit Akem over the middle.
If he can consistently do just those minimal things...which I think he absolutely can...this offense is going to be a monster again.
you have to think...what separated Sneed and Cam....it was mostly Sneeds running ability (hes obviously a huge leader too)....Sneed couldnt even use that the second half of the season. And most would say Cam has a stronger arm tan Sneed does.
With what he has around him...he can play a relatively safe role and this offense will still look dominant.
You make a good point, but don't forget that Edwards and Selle had the benefit of working in tandem with a substantially better rushing attack than the one we have/will presumably have next season.reinell30 said:When I hear that Cam isn't a mobile scrambler like Sneed is I think. Remember John Edwards, Andrew Selle? They weren't to fleet a foot either but we won. Cam will be just fine!...
George Ferguson said:Ohh the irony is thick on this one. A quick glance back at Egriz on Saturday night had a lot of posters clamoring for Humphrey to go in at Weber. A few days later though, he's not good enough lol.
uofmman1122 said:You make a good point, but don't forget that Edwards and Selle had the benefit of working in tandem with a substantially better rushing attack than the one we have/will presumably have next season.reinell30 said:When I hear that Cam isn't a mobile scrambler like Sneed is I think. Remember John Edwards, Andrew Selle? They weren't to fleet a foot either but we won. Cam will be just fine!...
hm.grwn.grizfan said:George Ferguson said:Ohh the irony is thick on this one. A quick glance back at Egriz on Saturday night had a lot of posters clamoring for Humphrey to go in at Weber. A few days later though, he's not good enough lol.
I thought that given the way sneed was playing, Humphrey should have gone in and given the defense a different look. I think he will be QB1 next year unless the saddleback Juco transfer is just that much better that he can beat out a seasoned Humphrey.
Htowngriz said:hm.grwn.grizfan said:George Ferguson said:Ohh the irony is thick on this one. A quick glance back at Egriz on Saturday night had a lot of posters clamoring for Humphrey to go in at Weber. A few days later though, he's not good enough lol.
I thought that given the way sneed was playing, Humphrey should have gone in and given the defense a different look. I think he will be QB1 next year unless the saddleback Juco transfer is just that much better that he can beat out a seasoned Humphrey.
If they were playing well enough to bamboozle Sneed, what do you think they would have done to a QB with far less mobility and in-game experience?
Htowngriz said:hm.grwn.grizfan said:George Ferguson said:Ohh the irony is thick on this one. A quick glance back at Egriz on Saturday night had a lot of posters clamoring for Humphrey to go in at Weber. A few days later though, he's not good enough lol.
I thought that given the way sneed was playing, Humphrey should have gone in and given the defense a different look. I think he will be QB1 next year unless the saddleback Juco transfer is just that much better that he can beat out a seasoned Humphrey.
If they were playing well enough to bamboozle Sneed, what do you think they would have done to a QB with far less mobility and in-game experience?
Spanky2 said:I would submit that the concern would be better served to focus on the OL rather than a quality QB. No doubt, we saw considerable improvement with the OL, however, the line was less effective against a team such as Weber State. If Bobby can bring in a couple more JC or FBS transfers, the OL should be fully competitive at a higher level.
PlayerRep said:Htowngriz said:hm.grwn.grizfan said:George Ferguson said:Ohh the irony is thick on this one. A quick glance back at Egriz on Saturday night had a lot of posters clamoring for Humphrey to go in at Weber. A few days later though, he's not good enough lol.
I thought that given the way sneed was playing, Humphrey should have gone in and given the defense a different look. I think he will be QB1 next year unless the saddleback Juco transfer is just that much better that he can beat out a seasoned Humphrey.
If they were playing well enough to bamboozle Sneed, what do you think they would have done to a QB with far less mobility and in-game experience?
Given Sneed's injury and lack of running in recent games, do you think he was more mobile last game than Humphrey would have been? I don't know. Just asking.
I thought Hauck would leave Sneed in, and was fine with him doing that, but I would have been fine with Humphrey too. Had a change been made and Griz lost, Hauck would have gotten criticism. That isn't meant as a reason not to make a change.
I thought Sneed would lead the Griz to a comeback victory, and certainly a tie, until the last interception. It just felt that it was right that Sneed would rally and bring the Griz back. I was stunned when the interception occurred. I assume Sneed never saw or sensed the defender. That defender has good hands. Like Gubner.
and that endorsement is good enough for me! :thumb:AZGrizFan said:MTGRZ said:I believe in Cam. Is he the same fiery guy that Sneed is? Probably not. And that's OK-he needs to be himself to be his best. I think with a full offseason as QB1, he will develop into a guy that can take this team far.
Sneed's tweet post-game about Cam seems to imply HE thinks Cam is the guy. :thumb: :thumb:
Ursa Major said:PlayerRep said:Htowngriz said:hm.grwn.grizfan said:I thought that given the way sneed was playing, Humphrey should have gone in and given the defense a different look. I think he will be QB1 next year unless the saddleback Juco transfer is just that much better that he can beat out a seasoned Humphrey.
If they were playing well enough to bamboozle Sneed, what do you think they would have done to a QB with far less mobility and in-game experience?
Given Sneed's injury and lack of running in recent games, do you think he was more mobile last game than Humphrey would have been? I don't know. Just asking.
I thought Hauck would leave Sneed in, and was fine with him doing that, but I would have been fine with Humphrey too. Had a change been made and Griz lost, Hauck would have gotten criticism. That isn't meant as a reason not to make a change.
I thought Sneed would lead the Griz to a comeback victory, and certainly a tie, until the last interception. It just felt that it was right that Sneed would rally and bring the Griz back. I was stunned when the interception occurred. I assume Sneed never saw or sensed the defender. That defender has good hands. Like Gubner.
Good post and good discussion. You could argue that the urgency of the game had its own inertia as far as keeping Sneed in. The later it got in the game, the more I can see why the coaches wanted their proven playmaker in the game. I also thought Sneed would rally for the win.
At what point do you pull Sneed? I can see the reasoning behind sitting Sneed for a series earlier in the 2nd half but when you only have time for two offensive series, I would go with the proven senior.
The other unknown factor is the confidence the staff have in Humphry.