Bobby better answer some questions

[gotgame75]

Yeah you're right- cultivating a terrible relationship with the press doesn't matter at all. It only shows what kind of person you are. And it's indicative of how Bobby handles pretty much everything - ie the #37 debacle, the Zach Graves situation, etc. All unforced errors. 95% of HC's seem to be able to manage the press just fine -its part of the job.

Why don't you ask Jace Lewis his opinion on Bobby?

What did he say? Are you going to talk about your personal conversation with Jace Lewis? Or are you starting a rumor on the internet that Jace Lewis hates Bobby Hauck?

I never said he hated him. But it's also no secret how he felt about Bobby in the wake of the #37 situation. Come on now, is that a huge shock?

 

[gotgame75]

You're wrong. I'm a HUGE FAN of losing big games against ranked opponents, never winning conference championships, failing to develop QBs or competent offensive lines all while acting like an entitled dick. In fact, give me more mediocrity! Tastes great!

Never winning conference championships :lol: he’s won 7

15 years ago. Do better. This is Hauck 2.0

 

[WaGriz4life]

What did he say? Are you going to talk about your personal conversation with Jace Lewis? Or are you starting a rumor on the internet that Jace Lewis hates Bobby Hauck?

I never said he hated him. But it's also no secret how he felt about Bobby in the wake of the #37 situation. Come on now, is that a huge shock?

I’ve never seen or heard Jace talk about it. Did I miss something? Are you just believing stuff on message boards again?

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

I am getting the feeling that Game doesn't like Bobby.

You're wrong. I'm a HUGE FAN of losing big games against ranked opponents, never winning conference championships, failing to develop QBs or competent offensive lines all while acting like an entitled dick. In fact, give me more mediocrity! Tastes great!

Sounds like someone could use a little therapy.

 

[gotgame75]

You're wrong. I'm a HUGE FAN of losing big games against ranked opponents, never winning conference championships, failing to develop QBs or competent offensive lines all while acting like an entitled dick. In fact, give me more mediocrity! Tastes great!

Sounds like someone could use a little therapy.

I definitely do. Watching this offense is the definition of seasonal depression.

 

[CatGrad-UMGradStu]

Y'all need to quit. PR is going to have to go back to Cali to help:

https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/34918726/stanford-student-suspended-serving-tree-mascot

 

[BadlandsGrizFan]

All I can say is QB club should be ugly this Monday. I’m going to pop off and I assume none of my questions will be asked.

No online questions were even recognized. Nice try though Badlands.

Haha I know. I sent multiple. Kind of expected.

 

[BadlandsGrizFan]

All I can say is QB club should be ugly this Monday. I’m going to pop off and I assume none of my questions will be asked.

I'd like to hear your questions for Bobby, wish I could be there. Maybe if 3 or 4 of you ask the same questions back to back he'll stop snarling and answer one of you. Or he'll get his knickers in a twist and blow up. The flip side is as bad as things are the Griz have played close on the score board. 3 wins should make you all delusional again (remember the posts questioning why the Griz weren't ranked #1 ahead of NDSU?) The reality is he needs another year or two to build depth, especially on the O line. This and a commitment to run the ball.

The staff didn’t ask him any online questions this week. Wonder why

 

[HelenaHandBasket]

Amazing how people only get real vocal about how Bobby acts with the press etc when things are going badly.

 

[uofmman1122]

Yes, but who was the safety that should have been backing them up and tried desperately, too late, to catch up?

Fouch was the safety on that play and he bit down hard

Because the running back was his man. He was doing his job. He's supposed to bite down on the rb in that situation.

Ford was manned up with the guy who scored. He was Ford's responsibility. There is no safety help on the defense that was called for that play.

 

[mthoopsfan]

Fouch was the safety on that play and he bit down hard

Because the running back was his man. He was doing his job. He's supposed to bite down on the rb in that situation.

Ford was manned up with the guy who scored. He was Ford's responsibility. There is no safety help on the defense that was called for that play.

Yup. You are right. Why is it so hard to read and learn? Obviously, some people don't realize that in man coverage, each defender has a man, and it's his job to cover his man. Whether the man goes short, medium, or long.

 

[uofmman1122]

Because the running back was his man. He was doing his job. He's supposed to bite down on the rb in that situation.

Ford was manned up with the guy who scored. He was Ford's responsibility. There is no safety help on the defense that was called for that play.

Yup. You are right. Why is it so hard to read and learn? Obviously, some people don't realize that in man coverage, each defender has a man, and it's his job to cover his man. Whether the man goes short, medium, or long.

I get that the narrative has turned into "our safeties are trash", so people are preconditioned to see it that way, and it does seem weird that Ford, a unanimous All American, would blow an assignment that badly.

But yeah, Justin messed up. His goal was to not allow a TD this year, and I'm sure his new goal is now to not allow another one.

 

[mthoopsfan]

All of our secondary players are good, but they are not perfect. Ford is a terrific player, but he inexplicably blew that one. In the prior game, someone did the same thing on the duck to the end zone for a TD. On the early long run, a lb goofed up and left a gap wide open. With the gap left open, it appeared to throw Hauck and he overran the play. On the 23 yard on 3d and 13, there was a goof up, I believe. The D played pretty well, though.

 

[SaskGriz]

All of our secondary players are good, but they are not perfect. Ford is a terrific player, but he inexplicably blew that one. In the prior game, someone did the same thing on the duck to the end zone for a TD. On the early long run, a lb goofed up and left a gap wide open. With the gap left open, it appeared to throw Hauck and he overran the play. On the 23 yard on 3d and 13, there was a goof up, I believe. The D played pretty well, though.

Your analysis of the long TD run at the end of the first quarter is not accurate. No LB "goofed up". It's 3rd and 5, we are in a 4-2-5 presnap. We have three guys with "hands in the dirt" looks like 2 in a 2-3 tech and one in a 7. The other front I think is 44 and he's standing up in a 6-9 tech. Our two LB's are sitting pretty standard Will and Mike and the DB's look like we are going to drop Cover 2.
Weber is in 11 personnel. With a WR and a slot to the Play side and single wing to the boundary, pistol formation.

Pre snap we walk 17 up into a deep Sam position and roll our nickle into a straight FS alignment.

We do one of our D's favourite games which is blitz two backers through one hole, the Mike loops the Will but their tackle picks the first backer and the second gets caught in the wash. The other LB read run and reacted but is wiped out by the down blocking combo of C-G-T and TE. Both 17 and 4 read run right away but if you watch you will see that 17 assumes it's going left and his first three steps are all left and parallel to the line. This leaves him set up to the cut back and it's good night nurse.

 

[mthoopsfan]

All of our secondary players are good, but they are not perfect. Ford is a terrific player, but he inexplicably blew that one. In the prior game, someone did the same thing on the duck to the end zone for a TD. On the early long run, a lb goofed up and left a gap wide open. With the gap left open, it appeared to throw Hauck and he overran the play. On the 23 yard on 3d and 13, there was a goof up, I believe. The D played pretty well, though.

Your analysis of the long TD run at the end of the first quarter is not accurate. No LB "goofed up". It's 3rd and 5, we are in a 4-2-5 presnap. We have three guys with "hands in the dirt" looks like 2 in a 2-3 tech and one in a 7. The other front I think is 44 and he's standing up in a 6-9 tech. Our two LB's are sitting pretty standard Will and Mike and the DB's look like we are going to drop Cover 2.
Weber is in 11 personnel. With a WR and a slot to the Play side and single wing to the boundary, pistol formation.

Pre snap we walk 17 up into a deep Sam position and roll our nickle into a straight FS alignment.

We do one of our D's favourite games which is blitz two backers through one hole, the Mike loops the Will but their tackle picks the first backer and the second gets caught in the wash. The other LB read run and reacted but is wiped out by the down blocking combo of C-G-T and TE. Both 17 and 4 read run right away but if you watch you will see that 17 assumes it's going left and his first three steps are all left and parallel to the line. This leaves him set up to the cut back and it's good night nurse.

Yes, it was a lb mistake. I know that from a parent of a starting lb, as well as from the coaches. It was a replacement for O'Connell. That lb may not have played the rest of the game. Man, you are really out to lunch and don't understand football or Griz football. Why do you keep embarrassing yourself?

 

[WaGriz4life]

All of our secondary players are good, but they are not perfect. Ford is a terrific player, but he inexplicably blew that one. In the prior game, someone did the same thing on the duck to the end zone for a TD. On the early long run, a lb goofed up and left a gap wide open. With the gap left open, it appeared to throw Hauck and he overran the play. On the 23 yard on 3d and 13, there was a goof up, I believe. The D played pretty well, though.

Your analysis of the long TD run at the end of the first quarter is not accurate. No LB "goofed up". It's 3rd and 5, we are in a 4-2-5 presnap. We have three guys with "hands in the dirt" looks like 2 in a 2-3 tech and one in a 7. The other front I think is 44 and he's standing up in a 6-9 tech. Our two LB's are sitting pretty standard Will and Mike and the DB's look like we are going to drop Cover 2.
Weber is in 11 personnel. With a WR and a slot to the Play side and single wing to the boundary, pistol formation.

Pre snap we walk 17 up into a deep Sam position and roll our nickle into a straight FS alignment.

We do one of our D's favourite games which is blitz two backers through one hole, the Mike loops the Will but their tackle picks the first backer and the second gets caught in the wash. The other LB read run and reacted but is wiped out by the down blocking combo of C-G-T and TE. Both 17 and 4 read run right away but if you watch you will see that 17 assumes it's going left and his first three steps are all left and parallel to the line. This leaves him set up to the cut back and it's good night nurse.

LB got the wrong call. Can’t remember who Hauck said it was. You are so wrong about so many things it’s great. I guess this is why we need Canadians around. My Mom used to try and convince me they served a purpose and I guess she was right.

 

[Fahque]

Fouch was the safety on that play and he bit down hard

Because the running back was his man. He was doing his job. He's supposed to bite down on the rb in that situation.

Ford was manned up with the guy who scored. He was Ford's responsibility. There is no safety help on the defense that was called for that play.

Gotcha, thanks

 

[SaskGriz]

Your analysis of the long TD run at the end of the first quarter is not accurate. No LB "goofed up". It's 3rd and 5, we are in a 4-2-5 presnap. We have three guys with "hands in the dirt" looks like 2 in a 2-3 tech and one in a 7. The other front I think is 44 and he's standing up in a 6-9 tech. Our two LB's are sitting pretty standard Will and Mike and the DB's look like we are going to drop Cover 2.
Weber is in 11 personnel. With a WR and a slot to the Play side and single wing to the boundary, pistol formation.

Pre snap we walk 17 up into a deep Sam position and roll our nickle into a straight FS alignment.

We do one of our D's favourite games which is blitz two backers through one hole, the Mike loops the Will but their tackle picks the first backer and the second gets caught in the wash. The other LB read run and reacted but is wiped out by the down blocking combo of C-G-T and TE. Both 17 and 4 read run right away but if you watch you will see that 17 assumes it's going left and his first three steps are all left and parallel to the line. This leaves him set up to the cut back and it's good night nurse.

Yes, it was a lb mistake. I know that from a parent of a starting lb, as well as from the coaches. It was a replacement for O'Connell. That lb may not have played the rest of the game. Man, you are really out to lunch and don't understand football or Griz football. Why do you keep embarrassing yourself?

So you are saying that 44 lined up wrong? Okay I can buy that. He's in a pretty traditional Sam set up, the TE in front of him pulls and he is engaged by the tackle. The RB cuts back into the A gap, if the Sam is off the line maybe he has gap responsibilities that far over but that's a pretty big ask if he's lined up on the line of scrimmage. A lot of traffic to get through if he's expected to clean up that far down the line. Probably should have been diagnosed from the sideline and burned a time out because with the Mike and Will running a game on the boundary side there is nobody holding down the fort in the middle of that play.

It's suppose to be a football web site so someone in the know, explain what the LB did wrong.

 

[SaskGriz]

Yes, it was a lb mistake. I know that from a parent of a starting lb, as well as from the coaches. It was a replacement for O'Connell. That lb may not have played the rest of the game. Man, you are really out to lunch and don't understand football or Griz football. Why do you keep embarrassing yourself?

So you are saying that 44 lined up wrong? Okay I can buy that. He's in a pretty traditional Sam set up, the TE in front of him pulls and he is engaged by the tackle. The RB cuts back into the A gap, if the Sam is off the line maybe he has gap responsibilities that far over but that's a pretty big ask if he's lined up on the line of scrimmage. A lot of traffic to get through if he's expected to clean up that far down the line. Probably should have been diagnosed from the sideline and burned a time out because with the Mike and Will running a game on the boundary side there is nobody holding down the fort in the middle of that play.

It's suppose to be a football web site so someone in the know, explain what the LB did wrong.

And one thing I am absolutely wrong on in my first analysis of the play was our Sam getting blocked by the TE, the TE pulled, so my bad there. It was the tackle that first engaged the Sam

 

[SoldierGriz]

You're wrong. I'm a HUGE FAN of losing big games against ranked opponents, never winning conference championships, failing to develop QBs or competent offensive lines all while acting like an entitled dick. In fact, give me more mediocrity! Tastes great!

Sounds like someone could use a little therapy.

Well, he's not wrong. BH 2.0 and his band of merry men haven't exactly blown the roof off the BSC conference since their return. Still time, but sure does feel like mediocrity right now.