statler & waldorf said:That ISN'T very witty. You can do better. You ISN'T trying.
You don't deserve more...
statler & waldorf said:That ISN'T very witty. You can do better. You ISN'T trying.
get'em_griz said:So my question is this... what exactly is there to play for now that EVERY team in the conference gets into the tournament? Winning the regular season and getting the #1 seed doesn't mean much if it means you risk getting bounced out by a .500 club team. The probability of this scenario happening is probably extremely low, but how embarrassing would it be for a .500 or less team win the tournament?
dbackjon said:I hope they do what some of the conferences do - give the top two teams double byes (guaranteed spot in the semifinals)
Let the bottom 10 teams battle for the other two spots in the Semis. lowest seeded survivor plays the #1 seed, highest seeded survivor plays the #2 seed.
EverettGriz said:I doubt any starters see more then five minutes action the last few weeks of the year. That'll be fun to watch. Meaningless games played by reserves.
[/quote-]
So, stay or get healthy for a tournament few will attend. The home game entertainment dollar will go somewhere else.
get'em_griz said:So my question is this... what exactly is there to play for now that EVERY team in the conference gets into the tournament? Winning the regular season and getting the #1 seed doesn't mean much if it means you risk getting bounced out by a .500 club team. The probability of this scenario happening is probably extremely low, but how embarrassing would it be for a .500 or less team win the tournament?
MrTitleist said:...you guys realize that pretty much every conference invites everyone to the conference tournament, right? I don't see the MW, Pac12, etc bitching about the "regular season meaning nothing." The lower seeds typically weed themselves out pretty quickly.
fanofzoo said:I will give it 3 years before they change it back.
marceagfan5 said:Ouch, I don't see how some of you think this is a good thing?
1.) The Big Sky needs to protect its best teams and try to put its best team in the NCAA and postseason tournaments, this doesn't help that.
2.) Who in the world is going to go to this tournament? The Big Sky has two big fan bases, Weber and UM in Bball, if they aren't playing in the championship, no one will be there, and even if its just one of them the place will be half full. Can you imagine a Sac St/EWU final, no one would be there...Comparing the Mtn West Conference to the Big Sky is a joke, plus Vegas is a whole lot different than Reno.
I understand the money situation, but I don't think the Big Sky made the right decision on this one...
Fire Haslam!grizindabox said:Colter Nuanez retweeted
Parker Gabriel @pgabriel15 38m38 minutes ago
Fields also said the committee brought proposal to a vote: Unanimous among ADs and also among school presidents. #BigSkyMBB #BigSkyWBB
EverettGriz said:MrTitleist said:...you guys realize that pretty much every conference invites everyone to the conference tournament, right? I don't see the MW, Pac12, etc bitching about the "regular season meaning nothing." The lower seeds typically weed themselves out pretty quickly.
Difference is, the 5th place team in the Pac12 generally gets an NCAA bid. The 5th place BSC team doesn't get a bid to the Montana class B tournament. (And if they did they'd be one and done).