Still no more comment from this POS conference on this?
CDAGRIZ said:CatsRback said:Anyways is colloquial, but I guess if you want perfect grammar I can try to not confuse you. Can’t win them all, right?![]()
Oh, I’m fine with whatever you want until you start trying to correct and criticize others. Then, it had better be perfect.
CatsRback said:alabamagrizzly said:That’s just sad and pathetic that you think your eGriz posting rights are worth more then money.
Than* (when comparing something), if used for time it’s then. Anyways, you wanting cash bets makes me think you are tight on the budget. Your grammar agrees.
alabamagrizzly said:CatsRback said:Than* (when comparing something), if used for time it’s then. Anyways, you wanting cash bets makes me think you are tight on the budget. Your grammar agrees.
Thanks for the grammar lesson that I’ll never remember. Nope, not interested in gambling money and yes, it is cus I’m tight in the budget. That being said, I have attempted to gamble my eGriz posting rights and won, obviously against a nodacker that thought his buffs would beat Ari St worse then the Griz beat their PAC 12 opponent last year. They didn’t and I ain’t seen 84 since. By the way, how’d y’all do against your PAC 12 opponent?
It’s not like either of us add anything substantial on here and that includes your free grammar lessons. I’m sure I could survive without the ability to post on here but that seems like that’d be a big loss for you, classic little bro.
CatsRback said:alabamagrizzly said:Thanks for the grammar lesson that I’ll never remember. Nope, not interested in gambling money and yes, it is cus I’m tight in the budget. That being said, I have attempted to gamble my eGriz posting rights and won, obviously against a nodacker that thought his buffs would beat Ari St worse then the Griz beat their PAC 12 opponent last year. They didn’t and I ain’t seen 84 since. By the way, how’d y’all do against your PAC 12 opponent?
It’s not like either of us add anything substantial on here and that includes your free grammar lessons. I’m sure I could survive without the ability to post on here but that seems like that’d be a big loss for you, classic little bro.
Nah don’t sell yourself short. It’s a message board we all have stuff to give. Back and forth makes it fun. Don’t take it personal. If you did I’m sorry.
But I will bet you account with you if you are confident in a gris win.
mthoopsfan said:CatsRback said:Nah don’t sell yourself short. It’s a message board we all have stuff to give. Back and forth makes it fun. Don’t take it personal. If you did I’m sorry.
But I will bet you account with you if you are confident in a gris win.
“bet you account”?
Excellent post.fishngriz said:An open letter to Commissioner Wistrcill:
All us Griz fans know the game with Sac State is over. The record books will show that Sac won and the Griz lost. That is a fact and it can't be changed. I'm writing to comment on your "tweet" which, in my opinion, was very disrespectful to Griz fans who have an extremely legitimate concern over a blown call near the end of that game. You dismissed these concerns with a "tweet" basically suggesting that the refs didn't have enough camera angles to get the call right. Just in case you didn't know, not even the NFL has 17 camera angles. However, in this case, getting the call right didn't require 17 camera angles. All the camera angles that ESPN had showed the receiver was out of bounds when he caught the ball. Clearly out of bounds. If you looked at the replays, and I certainly expect that you did, you know the call was wrong. The correct response from you is not some meaningless "tweet" denying the existence of a problem. The correct response would be a statement from your office admitting the refs got that call wrong and pledging, on behalf of the conference, to do additional training with the officials to try to ensure that such an egregious mistake does not occur again. To simply blow us off, as you did, is a guarantee that the argument will go on and on with you, rather than the ref who blew the call, as the bad guy. Unless you view it as part of your job description to take the bullet for incompetent refs, I can't imagine why you would want that.
CatsRback said:ordigger said:You get the win but you really didn’t beat Weber. 4 self inflicted safeties did. Take them out of the equation and the ensuing field position you don’t win either. Weber beat themselves and handed you a win.
Lemme guess… and you really didn’t “lose” to sac either.
A pretty reasonable explanation. The accusations are all misinformation. We can expect an FBI raid.fishngriz said:Unless you view it as part of your job description to take the bullet for incompetent refs, I can't imagine why you would want that.
fishngriz said:An open letter to Commissioner Wistrcill:
All us Griz fans know the game with Sac State is over. The record books will show that Sac won and the Griz lost. That is a fact and it can't be changed. I'm writing to comment on your "tweet" which, in my opinion, was very disrespectful to Griz fans who have an extremely legitimate concern over a blown call near the end of that game. You dismissed these concerns with a "tweet" basically suggesting that the refs didn't have enough camera angles to get the call right. Just in case you didn't know, not even the NFL has 17 camera angles. However, in this case, getting the call right didn't require 17 camera angles. All the camera angles that ESPN had showed the receiver was out of bounds when he caught the ball. Clearly out of bounds. If you looked at the replays, and I certainly expect that you did, you know the call was wrong. The correct response from you is not some meaningless "tweet" denying the existence of a problem. The correct response would be a statement from your office admitting the refs got that call wrong and pledging, on behalf of the conference, to do additional training with the officials to try to ensure that such an egregious mistake does not occur again. To simply blow us off, as you did, is a guarantee that the argument will go on and on with you, rather than the ref who blew the call, as the bad guy. Unless you view it as part of your job description to take the bullet for incompetent refs, I can't imagine why you would want that.
CatsRback said:alabamagrizzly said:Thanks for the grammar lesson that I’ll never remember. Nope, not interested in gambling money and yes, it is cus I’m tight in the budget. That being said, I have attempted to gamble my eGriz posting rights and won, obviously against a nodacker that thought his buffs would beat Ari St worse then the Griz beat their PAC 12 opponent last year. They didn’t and I ain’t seen 84 since. By the way, how’d y’all do against your PAC 12 opponent?
It’s not like either of us add anything substantial on here and that includes your free grammar lessons. I’m sure I could survive without the ability to post on here but that seems like that’d be a big loss for you, classic little bro.
Nah don’t sell yourself short. It’s a message board we all have stuff to give. Back and forth makes it fun. Don’t take it personal. If you did I’m sorry.
But I will bet you account with you if you are confident in a gris win.
Bok_Choi said:fishngriz said:An open letter to Commissioner Wistrcill:
All us Griz fans know the game with Sac State is over. The record books will show that Sac won and the Griz lost. That is a fact and it can't be changed. I'm writing to comment on your "tweet" which, in my opinion, was very disrespectful to Griz fans who have an extremely legitimate concern over a blown call near the end of that game. You dismissed these concerns with a "tweet" basically suggesting that the refs didn't have enough camera angles to get the call right. Just in case you didn't know, not even the NFL has 17 camera angles. However, in this case, getting the call right didn't require 17 camera angles. All the camera angles that ESPN had showed the receiver was out of bounds when he caught the ball. Clearly out of bounds. If you looked at the replays, and I certainly expect that you did, you know the call was wrong. The correct response from you is not some meaningless "tweet" denying the existence of a problem. The correct response would be a statement from your office admitting the refs got that call wrong and pledging, on behalf of the conference, to do additional training with the officials to try to ensure that such an egregious mistake does not occur again. To simply blow us off, as you did, is a guarantee that the argument will go on and on with you, rather than the ref who blew the call, as the bad guy. Unless you view it as part of your job description to take the bullet for incompetent refs, I can't imagine why you would want that.
Loved this. But let’s look at what the actual problem is . The quality of football reffing in the BSC has been in the box checked abysmal for years now. Tommy’s been denying the existence of a problem since he arrived. In fact, he doesn't want to hear it - at all. So if the schools say anything publicly, coaches complain, they get spanked.
Like I said, love the sentiment, but it’s wasted on someone who only cares about the conference social media content. Everything that really matters, not so much.
alabamagrizzly said:CatsRback said:Nah don’t sell yourself short. It’s a message board we all have stuff to give. Back and forth makes it fun. Don’t take it personal. If you did I’m sorry.
But I will bet you account with you if you are confident in a gris win.
Sure, I’m in but let’s make it really interesting and include our litter box nation accounts too. Yes, I have trolled over there under the same name. What’s your LBN account name and we can make it a more even bet. We each lose our home site and rival site accounts. Sound good to you?
CatsRback said:alabamagrizzly said:Sure, I’m in but let’s make it really interesting and include our litter box nation accounts too. Yes, I have trolled over there under the same name. What’s your LBN account name and we can make it a more even bet. We each lose our home site and rival site accounts. Sound good to you?
Ironically I don’t have one. Believe it or not! They don’t inspire me to troll over there.
alabamagrizzly said:CatsRback said:Ironically I don’t have one. Believe it or not! They don’t inspire me to troll over there.
So your saying you have such a massive little brother complex that you’re only inspired to post on your rivals board after you finally had a decent little four game winning streak after almost 40 years of beat downs? Interesting. Whatever, I’ll still take your bet cus like I said, posting on egriz don’t mean shit to me. It’s not like I’ll win much either cus after Nov 19th you’ll likely go into hiding anyway. At least though you won’t be back….get it? Cats aren’t back. Unless you mean taking the back seat. In that case, you’re right. Also, you forgot to let me know how your PAC 12 game went this year. Did you guys win?
The day after cat/Griz, this guy will be here with a new screen name, I’m guessing one of these:CatsRback said:alabamagrizzly said:So your saying you have such a massive little brother complex that you’re only inspired to post on your rivals board after you finally had a decent little four game winning streak after almost 40 years of beat downs? Interesting. Whatever, I’ll still take your bet cus like I said, posting on egriz don’t mean shit to me. It’s not like I’ll win much either cus after Nov 19th you’ll likely go into hiding anyway. At least though you won’t be back….get it? Cats aren’t back. Unless you mean taking the back seat. In that case, you’re right. Also, you forgot to let me know how your PAC 12 game went this year. Did you guys win?
Fiesty I like it. Excited for 11/19! Good luck this weekend. Please try to win so maybe game day will come. But if y’all drop again, they will probably not.
garizzalies said:The day after cat/Griz, this guy will be here with a new screen name, I’m guessing one of these:CatsRback said:Fiesty I like it. Excited for 11/19! Good luck this weekend. Please try to win so maybe game day will come. But if y’all drop again, they will probably not.
CatsR-barBack
WelcomeBack,Katter
GuessWhosBack?CatsRback
CatsRreallyBackThisTime
CatsRresurrected
CatsWillRiseLikeJesusHimself
Perhaps. But concernedCat/Trollposter,i.e.concernedabouttheGrizteamandfans doesn't roll off the tongue like the ones garizzalies came up with.....mthoopsfan said:garizzalies said:The day after cat/Griz, this guy will be here with a new screen name, I’m guessing one of these:
CatsR-barBack
WelcomeBack,Katter
GuessWhosBack?CatsRback
CatsRreallyBackThisTime
CatsRresurrected
CatsWillRiseLikeJesusHimself
That was funny. But isn't he just a concerned Cat/Troll poster, i.e. concerned about the Griz team and fans?